UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material Under Rule14a-12

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

  No fee required.
  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
  1)(1)  

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

2)
(2)  

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

3)
(3)  

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

4)
(4)  

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

5)
(5)  

Total fee paid:

 

     

  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing:
1)
(1)  

Amount previously paid:Previously Paid:

 

     

2)
(2)  

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No:

 

     

3)
(3)  

Filing party:Party:

 

     

4)
(4)  

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

(Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore)

(Company Registration Number 201218209G)

NOTICE OF 20182020 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TIME: 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time

DATE: August 7, 201812, 2020

PLACE: Wave Life Sciences Ltd., 733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138

To Our Shareholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 20182020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. to be held at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday,Wednesday, August 7, 201812, 2020 at 733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138. In this Notice, we refer to the 20182020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders as the “2018“2020 AGM” and we refer to Wave Life Sciences Ltd. as “Wave,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our.” Details regarding the 20182020 AGM, the business to be conducted at the 20182020 AGM, and information about Wave Life Sciences Ltd. that you should consider when you vote your shares are described in the attached proxy statement. The 2020 AGM is subject to the evolvingCOVID-19 situation, and shareholders should note that we may be required or it may be advisable to change our meeting arrangements for the 2020 AGM on short notice. Shareholders should refer to Wave’s website at https://ir.wavelifesciences.com/ and/or its announcements for the latest updates on the status of the 2020 AGM.

The 20182020 AGM will be held for the following purposes:

As Special Business

 

1.(a)

To elect Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(a))

 

 (b)

To elect Christian HenryMark H.N. Corrigan, M.D. to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(b))

 

 (c)

To elect Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D.Christian Henry to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(c))

 

 (d)

To elect Koji MiuraPeter Kolchinsky, Ph.D. to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(d))

 

 (e)

To elect Adrian RawcliffeAmy Pott to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(e))

 

 (f)

To elect Ken TakanashiAdrian Rawcliffe to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(f))

 

 (g)

To elect Ken Takanashi to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(g))

(h)

To elect Aik Na Tan to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(h))

(i)

To elect Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D. to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(g)1(i))


(j)

To elect Heidi L. Wagner, J.D. to serve on the Board of Directors;

(Ordinary Resolution 1(j))

Subject to the passing of Ordinary Resolution 1(h), to note the retirement of Koji Miura at the conclusion of the 2020 AGM.

As Ordinary Business

 

 2.

To approve there-appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor for the year ending December 31, 2018,2020, and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to fix KPMG LLP’s remuneration for services provided through the date of our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders;

(Ordinary Resolution 2)

 

 3.

To approve the Company’s payment of cash and equity-based compensation tonon-employee directors for service on the Board of Directors and its committees, in the manner and on the basis as set forth under “Proposal 3:Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation” in the attached proxy statement;

(Ordinary Resolution 3)


As Special Business

 

 4.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 161 of the Singapore Companies Act (the “Singapore Companies Act”), Chapter 50, and also subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and our Constitution, authority be, and hereby is, given to our Board of Directors:

 

 (a)

to:

 

 (i)

allot and issue ordinary shares in our capital; and/or

 

 (ii)

make or grant offers, agreements, options or other instruments (including the grant of awards or options pursuant to our equity-based incentive plans and agreements in effect from time to time) that might or would require ordinary shares to be allotted and issued, whether such allotment or issuance would occur during or after the expiration of this authority (including but not limited to, the creation and issuance of warrants, rights, units, purchase contracts, debentures or other instruments (including debt instruments) convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares),

at any time to and/or with such persons and upon such terms and conditions, for such purposes and for consideration as our directors may in their sole discretion deem fit, and with such rights or restrictions as our directors may think fit to impose and as are set forth in our Constitution; and

 

 (b)

to allot and issue ordinary shares in our capital pursuant to any offer, agreement, option or other agreement made, granted or authorized by our directors while this resolution was in effect, regardless of whether the authority conferred by this resolution may have ceased to be in effect at the time of the allotment and issuance,

and that such authority, if approved by our shareholders, shall continue in effect until the earlier of the conclusion of our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders or the expiration of the period within which our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is required by law to be held; and     

(Ordinary Resolution 4)

 

 5.

To approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis only, the compensation of our named executive officers:

“RESOLVED, on anon-binding, advisory basis only, that the compensation paid to the named executive officers of the Company, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related material disclosed in this proxy statement, is hereby APPROVED.”


Thisnon-binding advisory resolution is being proposed to shareholders as required pursuant to the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act.” The shareholders’ vote on this proposal is solely advisory andnon-binding in nature, will have no legal effect for purposes of Singapore law and will not be enforceable against our Company or our Board of Directors; and

(Non-Binding Advisory Resolution 5)

6.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the 20182020 AGM and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

The Board of Directors recommends the approval of each of the first fourfive proposals.

All of the above proposals should be read in conjunction with the attached proxy statement, which sets out the specific parameters of the proposals.

Each of the matters to be voted on at the 20182020 AGM (other than Proposal 5, which is the onlynon-binding advisory resolution) may be passed by ordinary resolution pursuant to our Constitution.

Notes About the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

Eligibility to Vote at 20182020 AGM. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on June 22, 201817, 2020 as the record date for determining those shareholders who will be entitled to receive copies of this Notice and the attached proxy statement. However, under Singapore law, only registered holders of our ordinary shares (i.e., persons whose names appear on the Register of Members of the Company maintained in accordance with Section 190 of the Singapore Companies Act), or “shareholders of record,” on the date of the 20182020 AGM, August 7, 2018,12, 2020, will be entitled to vote at the 20182020 AGM. If you have sold or transferred any of your ordinary shares after June 22, 201817, 2020 and prior to the 20182020 AGM, you should immediately forward this Notice and the attached proxy statement and proxy card to the purchaser or transferee of such shares, or to the bank, broker or agent through whom the sale of such shares was effected, for onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee. If you hold shares other than in registered form as a shareholder of record, and instead hold your shares as, or through, a participant in DTC (i.e., in “street name”), we understand that in order for your vote to be counted at the 20182020 AGM, you must also have been a holder of shares at, and with effect from, June 22, 2018.17, 2020. As of June 15, 2018,17, 2020, we had 29,293,05035,732,154 ordinary shares issued and outstanding.


Proxies. All shareholders of record as of the date of the 20182020 AGM are cordially invited to attend the 20182020 AGM or appoint a proxy to attend and vote in their place (referred to as a “legal proxy”). A legal proxy need not also be a shareholder of record.Whether or not you plan to attend the 20182020 AGM, or not, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy card by mail in order to ensure the presence of a quorum. A proxy card must be received by Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for holding the 20182020 AGM or within such other time as may be required by the Singapore Companies Act. Completion and submission of the proxy card shall not preclude a shareholder of record from attending and voting at the 20182020 AGM. Any appointment of a legal proxy or proxies will be revoked if a shareholder of record attends and votes in person at the 20182020 AGM, and in such event, we reserve the right to refuse to admit any person or persons appointed under the instrument of proxy or proxies to the meeting.

For the avoidance of doubt, the reference to “proxy” in this Notice does not mean a “legal proxy” entitled under Singapore law to attend and vote on behalf of a shareholder of record. The reference to “soliciting your proxy” means that a shareholder of record may appoint the persons identified on the proxy card as such shareholder’s legal proxies to vote in accordance with such shareholder’s instructions given via proxy or to authorize such persons to vote freely.

Beneficial or “Street Name” Holders. If your shares are held in “street name” (i.e., in the name of a bank, broker or other shareholder of record), you will receive instructions from the shareholder of record. You must


follow the instructions of the shareholder of record in order for your shares to be voted. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you plan to vote your shares in person at the 20182020 AGM, you should contact your broker or agent to obtain a legal proxy or broker’s proxy card and bring it to the 20182020 AGM in order to vote as a legal proxy.

Singapore Audited Accounts. At the 20182020 AGM, our shareholders will have the opportunity to discuss and ask questions regarding our Singapore audited accounts for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, together with the directors’ statement and independent auditors’ report thereon, in compliance with the laws of Singapore. Shareholder approval of our Singapore audited accounts is not being sought by the attached proxy statement and will not be sought at the 20182020 AGM.

COVID-19. The 2020 AGM is subject to the evolvingCOVID-19 situation, and shareholders should note that we may be required or it may be advisable to change our meeting arrangements for the 2020 AGM on short notice. Shareholders should refer to Wave’s website at https://ir.wavelifesciences.com/ and/or its announcements for the latest updates on the status of the 2020 AGM.

When you have finished reading the attached proxy statement, you are urged to vote in accordance with the instructions set forth in the proxy statement. We encourage you to vote by proxy so that your shares will be represented and voted at the 20182020 AGM, whether or not you can attend.

Thank you for your continued support of Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

 

  BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
  LOGO
June 28, 201826, 2020  

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA

  

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   PAGE 

Important Information About the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and Voting

   2 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

   8 

Management and Corporate Governance

   1112 

Executive Officer and Director Compensation

   1924 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

   2545 

Report of Audit Committee

   26

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

2746 

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

   2747 

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

   3149 

Proposal 2: Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Independent Singapore Auditor and Auditor Remuneration

   3250 

Proposal 3:Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation

   3452 

Proposal 4: Ordinary Share Allotments and Issuances

   3654

Proposal 5:Non-Binding Advisory Resolution on Approval of Executive Compensation as Disclosed in the Proxy Statement

56 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

   3857 

Other Matters

   3857 

Shareholder Proposals and Nominations For Director

   3857 
Appendices  
Appendix A – Singapore Statutory Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 20172019   A-1 

 

i


IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 7, 201812, 2020

The Notice, this proxy statement and our 20172019 annual report to shareholders are available for viewing, printing and downloading at https://materials.proxyvote.com/. You can elect to receive distributions of our proxy statements and annual reports to shareholders for future annual general meetings by electronic delivery. For specific instructions on making such an election, please refer to the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction form.

At no charge, we are providing each person from whom a proxy is solicited a copy of, and access to, our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, as amended, or our “2017 “2019Form10-K.” Additionally, you can find a copy of our 20172019 Form10-K on the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC,” at www.sec.gov, or in the “For Investors & Media” section of our website at http://ir.wavelifesciences.com/ under the heading “Financial Information.” You may also obtain a printed copy of our 20172019 Form10-K, free of charge, from us by sending a written request to Investor Relations, Wave Life Sciences Ltd., 733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 or by email to IR@wavelifesci.com. Exhibits to our 20172019 Form10-K will be provided upon written request and payment of an appropriate processing fee.

The information provided on our website (www.wavelifesciences.com) is referenced in this proxy statement for information purposes only. The information on our website shall not be deemed to be a part of or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or any other filings we make with the SEC or any solicitation of proxies by us.

 

ii


WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

733 CONCORD AVENUE

CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

20182020 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 7, 201812, 2020

This proxy statement, along with the accompanying Notice of 20182020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, or the “Notice,” contains information about the 20182020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (including any adjournments or postponements thereof), which we refer to in this proxy statement as the “2018“2020 AGM.” We are holding the 20182020 AGM at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday,Wednesday, August 7, 2018,12, 2020, at 733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138. The 2020 AGM is subject to the evolvingCOVID-19 situation, and shareholders should note that we may be required or it may be advisable to change our meeting arrangements for the 2020 AGM on short notice. Shareholders should refer to Wave’s website at https://ir.wavelifesciences.com/ and/or its announcements for the latest updates on the status of the 2020 AGM.

In this proxy statement, we refer to Wave Life Sciences Ltd. as “Wave,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our.”

This proxy statement relates to the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors for use at the 20182020 AGM.

On or about July 2, 2018,June 30, 2020, we beganintend to begin sending this proxy statement, the Notice and the enclosed proxy card to shareholders of record as of June 22, 2018.17, 2020.

Although not part of this proxy statement, we are also sending, along with this proxy statement, our 20172019 annual report to shareholders, which includes our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019. Except as otherwise stated herein, all monetary amounts in this proxy statement have been presented in U.S. dollars.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND VOTING

Why is the Company Soliciting My Proxy?

The Board of Directors of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (the “Board” or our “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 20182020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “2020 AGM”) to be held at 733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 on Tuesday,Wednesday, August 7, 2018,12, 2020, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and any adjournments or postponements of the 20182020 AGM. The 2020 AGM is subject to the evolvingCOVID-19 situation, and shareholders should note that we may be required or it may be advisable to change our meeting arrangements for the 2020 AGM on short notice This proxy statement, along with the Notice, summarizes the purposes of the meeting and the information you need to know to vote at the 20182020 AGM.

We have made available to you on the Internet or have sent you this proxy statement, the Notice, the proxy card, and our 20172019 annual report to shareholders because you owned ordinary shares of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. on the record date for determining those shareholders who will be entitled to receive copies of the Notice and this proxy statement. We beganintend to begin distributing the proxy materials to shareholders on or about July 2, 2018.June 30, 2020.

For the avoidance of doubt, the reference to “proxy” in this proxy statement does not mean a “legal proxy” entitled under Singapore law to attend and vote on behalf of a shareholder of record. The reference to “soliciting your proxy” means that a shareholder of record may appoint the persons identified on the proxy card as such shareholder’s legal proxy to vote in accordance with such shareholder’s instructions given via proxy or to authorize such persons to vote freely.

Who Can Vote?

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on June 22, 201817, 2020 as the record date for determining those shareholders who will be entitled to receive copies of the Notice and this proxy statement. However, under Singapore law, only registered holders of our ordinary shares, or “shareholders of record,” on the date of the 20182020 AGM, August 7, 2018,12, 2020, will be entitled to vote at the 20182020 AGM. If you have sold or transferred any of your ordinary shares after the record date of June 22, 201817, 2020 and prior to the 20182020 AGM, you should immediately forward the Notice, this proxy statement and the proxy card to the purchaser or transferee of such shares, or to the bank, broker or agent through whom the sale of such shares was effected, for onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee. If you hold shares other than in registered form as a shareholder of record, and instead hold your shares as, or through, a participant in DTC (i.e., in “street name”), we understand that in order for your vote to be counted at the 20182020 AGM (represented by a shareholder of record), you must also have been a holder of shares at, and with effect from, June 22, 201817, 2020 through the date of the 20182020 AGM. As of June 15, 2018,17, 2020, we had 29,293,05035,732,154 ordinary shares issued and outstanding.

All shareholders of record as of the date of the 20182020 AGM are cordially invited to attend the 20182020 AGM or appoint a legal proxy to attend and vote in their place. A legal proxy need not also be a shareholder of record.Whether or not you plan to attend the 20182020 AGM, or not, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy card by mail in order to ensure the presence of a quorum.A proxy card must be received by Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for holding the 20182020 AGM or within such other time as may be required by the Singapore Companies Act. Completion and submission of the proxy card shall not preclude a shareholder of record from attending and voting at the 20182020 AGM. Any appointment of a legal proxy or proxies will be revoked if a shareholder of record attends the 2018 AGMand votes in person at the 2020 AGM, and in such event, we reserve the right to refuse to admit any person or persons appointed under the instrument of proxy or proxies to the meeting. Shareholders of record may change or revoke their legal proxies at any time before their shares are voted at the 20182020 AGM. For instructions on how to change or revoke your legal proxy, see “May I Change or Revoke My Proxy?” below.

How Many Votes Do I Have?

Each ordinary share that you own or represent as a legal proxy entitles you to one vote at the 20182020 AGM. The Series A preferred shares of the Company are not entitled to vote on any of the matters being proposed at the 20182020 AGM.

How Do I Vote?

If you are not planning to attend the 20182020 AGM, we urge you to vote by proxy. All shares represented by valid proxies that we receive through this solicitation, and that are not revoked, will be voted in accordance with your instructions on the proxy card. You may specify whether your shares should be voted for, against or abstain for each nominee for director, and whether your shares should be voted for, against or abstain with respect to each of the other proposals. If you properly submit a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as noted below, except as described under “Will My Shares be Voted if I Do Not Vote or Provide Voting Instructions?” Voting by proxy will not affect your right to attend the 20182020 AGM. If you are a shareholder of record such that your shares are registered directly in your name through our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., or you have share certificates registered in your name, you may vote:

 

By mail. If you received a proxy card by mail, you can vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card as instructed on the card. If you sign the proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares voted, they will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as noted below.

 

In person at the meeting. If you attend the meeting, you may vote by completing a ballot, which will be available at the meeting.

A proxy card must be received by Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for holding the 20182020 AGM or within such other time as may be required by the Singapore Companies Act.

If your shares are held in “street name” (i.e., in the name of a bank, broker or other shareholder of record), you will receive instructions from the shareholder of record. You must follow the instructions of the shareholder of record in order for your shares to be voted. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you plan to vote your shares in person at the 20182020 AGM, you should contact your broker or agent to obtain a legal proxy or broker’s proxy card and bring it to the 20182020 AGM in order to vote.

How Does the Board of Directors Recommend That I Vote on the Proposals?

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote as follows:

 

  

FOR” each of the resolutions for the election of the nominees for director;

 

  

FOR” the approval of there-appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor for the year ending December 31, 20182020 and the authorization of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to fix KPMG LLP’s remuneration for services provided through the date of our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders;

 

  

FOR” the approval of cash and equity-based compensation to be paid to thenon-employee members of the Board of Directors for service on the Board of Directors and its committees, as described under “Proposal 3:Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation”; and

 

  

FOR” the authorization of the Board of Directors to allot and issue ordinary shares of the Company.Company; and

FOR” thenon-binding advisory resolution on compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement.

If any other matter is presented at the 20182020 AGM, your proxy card provides that your shares will be voted by the proxy holder listed in the proxy card in accordance with his or herthe proxy holder’s judgment. At the time this proxy statement was first made available, we knew of no matters that needed to be acted on at the 20182020 AGM, other than those discussed in this proxy statement.

May I Change or Revoke My Proxy?

If you give us your proxy, you may change or revoke it at any time before or at the 20182020 AGM in any one of the following ways:

 

if you received a proxy card, by signing and submitting a new proxy card with a date later than your previously delivered proxy card, which must be received by Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for holding the 20182020 AGM or within such other time as may be required by the Singapore Companies Act; or

 

by attending and voting at the 20182020 AGM in personperson. Any appointment of a legal proxy or proxies will be revoked if a shareholder of record attends and voting in person. Attending the 2018 AGMvotes in person will not in and of itself revoke a previously submitted proxy. You must specifically request at the 2018 AGM that your previously submitted proxy be revoked.2020 AGM.

Your most current vote is the one that will be counted.

What if I Receive More Than One Proxy Card?

You may receive more than one proxy card if you hold any of our ordinary shares in more than one account, which may be in registered form or held in street name. Please vote in the manner described above under “How Do I Vote?” for each account to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Will My Shares be Voted if I Do Not Vote or Provide Voting Instructions?

If your shares are registered in your name or if you have share certificates, they will not be counted if you do not vote as described above under “How Do I Vote?”. If your shares are held in street name and you do not provide voting instructions to the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares as described above, the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares has the authority to vote your unvoted shares without receiving instructions from you on all of the proposals to be voted on at the 2018 AGM, other than the election of directors (Proposal 1), and Proposal 2:the approval of thenon-employeere-appointment directors’ compensation (Proposal 3).of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor and the authorization of KPMG’s remuneration. We encourage you to provide voting instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee to ensure your shares will be voted at the 20182020 AGM and in the manner you desire. A “brokernon-vote” will occur if your broker cannot vote your shares on a particular matter because it has not received instructions from you and does not have discretionary voting authority on that matter or because your broker chooses not to vote on a matter for which it does have discretionary voting authority.

What Vote is Required to Approve Each Proposal and How are Votes Counted?

 

Proposal 1: Elect Directors

Each nominee for director who receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of ordinary shares voting either in person or by proxy at the 20182020 AGM will be elected to serve until the next annual general meeting of shareholders (meaning the number of shares voted “for” a nominee must exceed the number of shares voted “against” such nominee).

 You may vote either “for” or “against” each of the nominees, or you may “abstain” from voting for one or more nominees. If you “abstain” from voting with respect to one or more nominees, your vote will have no effect on the election of such nominees. Brokerage firms do not have authority to vote customers’ unvoted shares held by the firms in street name with respect to this proposal. As a result, any shares not voted by a customer will be treated as a brokernon-vote. Such brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Proposal 2: Approve theRe-Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Independent Singapore Auditor and Authorize the Auditor’s Remuneration

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares voting in person or by proxy at the 20182020 AGM is required to approve there-appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and our independent Singapore auditor and to authorize the Audit Committee to fix the auditor’s remuneration (meaning the number of shares voted “for” the proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” the proposal).

 

 You may vote either “for” or “against” or “abstain” from voting on this proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of this vote. Brokerage firms have authority to vote customers’ unvoted shares held by the firms in street name on this proposal. If a broker does not exercise this authority, such brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

 

Proposal 3: Approve theNon-Employee Directors’ Compensation

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares voting in person or by proxy at the 20182020 AGM is required to approve thenon-employee directors’ compensation (meaning the number of shares voted “for” the proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” the proposal).

 

 You may vote either “for” or “against” or “abstain” from voting on this proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of this vote. Brokerage firms do not have authority to vote customers’ unvoted shares held by the firms in street name with respect to this proposal. As a result, any shares not voted by a customer will be treated as a brokernon-vote. Such brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

 

Proposal 4: Authorize the Board to Allot and Issue Ordinary Shares of the Company

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares voting in person or by proxy at the 20182020 AGM is required to authorize the Board of Directors to allot and issue ordinary shares of the Company (meaning the number of shares voted “for” the proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” the proposal).

 

 You may vote either “for” or “against” or “abstain” from voting on this proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of this vote. Brokerage firms do not have authority to vote customers’ unvoted shares held by the firms in street name onwith respect to this proposal. IfAs a broker doesresult, any shares not exercise this authority, suchvoted by a customer will be treated as a brokernon-vote. Such brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Proposal 5: Approve aNon-Binding Advisory Resolution on the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers

Thisnon-binding advisory resolution is being proposed to shareholders as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act.” The shareholders’ vote on this proposal is solely advisory andnon-binding in nature, will have no legal effect for purposes of Singapore law and will not be enforceable against our Company or our Board. For the avoidance of doubt, this is not an Ordinary Resolution.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares voting in person or by proxy at the 2020 AGM is required to approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis only, the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement (meaning the number of shares voted “for” the proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” the proposal).

You may vote either “for” or “against” or “abstain” from voting on this proposal. Abstentions will have no effect on the results of this vote. Brokerage firms do not have authority to vote customers’ unvoted shares held by the firms in street name with respect to this proposal. As a result, any shares not voted by a customer will be treated as a brokernon-vote. Such brokernon-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Is Voting Confidential?

We will keep all the proxies, ballots and voting tabulations private. We only let our Inspector of Elections, a representative of Broadridge, examine these documents. Management will not know how you voted on a specific proposal unless it is necessary to meet legal requirements. However, Broadridge will forward to management any written comments you make, either on the proxy card or that you otherwise provide.

Where Can I Find the Voting Results of the 20182020 AGM?

The preliminary voting results will be announced at the 20182020 AGM, and we will publish preliminary results, or final results if available, in a Current Report on Form8-K within four business days after the 20182020 AGM. If final results are unavailable at the time we file the Form8-K, then we will file an amended report on Form8-K to disclose the final voting results within four business days after the final voting results are known.

What Are the Costs of Soliciting these Proxies?

We will pay all of the costs of soliciting these proxies. Our directors and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone, fax or email. We will pay these employees and directors no additional compensation for these services. We will ask banks, brokers and other institutions, nominees and fiduciaries to forward these proxy materials to their principals and to obtain authority to execute proxies. We will then reimburse them for their expenses.

What Constitutes a Quorum for the 20182020 AGM?

In order to hold the meeting, there must be a quorum. The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least two shareholders holding in aggregate at least a majority of all issued and outstanding ordinary shares entitled to vote at the 20182020 AGM is necessary to constitute a quorum at the 20182020 AGM. Votes of shareholders of record who are present in person or represented by proxy at the 20182020 AGM, abstentions and brokernon-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.

Attending the 20182020 AGM

The 20182020 AGM will be held at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday,Wednesday, August 7, 201812, 2020 at 733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138. When you arrive, signs will direct you to the appropriate meeting rooms. You need not attend the 20182020 AGM in person in order to vote, provided that your proxy is present to represent your vote. The 2020 AGM is subject to the evolvingCOVID-19 situation, and shareholders should note that we may be required or it may be advisable to change our meeting arrangements for the 2020 AGM on short notice. Shareholders should refer to Wave’s website at https://ir.wavelifesciences.com/ and/or its announcements for the latest updates on the status of the 2020 AGM.

Singapore Statutory Financial Statements

Our Singapore audited accounts for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, prepared in conformity with the provisions of the laws of Singapore, and the accompanying directors’ statement and the independent auditors’ report thereon are required under Singapore law and our Constitution to be provided to shareholders for discussion at the 20182020 AGM. We refer to such materials herein collectively as the “Singapore Statutory Financial Statements.” The Singapore Statutory Financial Statements are provided asAppendix A to this proxy statement solely to satisfy this requirement. At the 20182020 AGM, our shareholders will have the opportunity to discuss and ask questions regarding the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements. Shareholder approval of the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements is not being sought by this proxy statement for the 20182020 AGM and will not be sought at the 20182020 AGM. The Singapore Statutory Financial Statements shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,the “SEC,” nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or be subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference into any such filing.

Emerging Growth Company

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the “JOBS Act.” As an emerging growth company, we have taken advantage of, and may continue to take advantage of, specified reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements;

exemptions from the requirements to obtain anon-binding advisory vote on executive compensation or a shareholder approval of any golden parachute arrangements; and

an exemption from compliance with the auditor attestation requirement on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

We have taken advantage of certain of the exemptions provided under the JOBS Act. We may continue to take advantage of exemptions under the JOBS Act until the fifth anniversary of our initial public offering or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We would cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than $1 billion in annual revenues, we have more than $700 million in market value of our shares held bynon-affiliates, or we issue more than $1 billion ofnon-convertible debt over a three-year period. Under the JOBS Act, we may choose to take advantage of some but not all of these reduced disclosure requirements. We have taken advantage of these reduced disclosure requirements in this proxy statement, and may continue to do so in future filings. Therefore, the information contained herein may be different than the information you receive from other public companies in which you hold stock.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF

CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of June 15, 20182020 for (i) the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement, (ii) each of our directors and director nominees, (iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group, and (iv) each shareholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our ordinary shares. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. We deem ordinary shares that may be acquired by an individual or group within 60 days ofafter June 15, 20182020 pursuant to the exercise of options, the vesting of restricted share units andunit awards, or the conversion of our outstanding Series A preferred shares into ordinary shares to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group, but such shares are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the table. Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, we believe that the shareholders named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all ordinary shares shown to be beneficially owned by them based on information provided to us by these shareholders. Percentage ownership is based on 29,293,05035,732,154 ordinary shares outstanding on June 15, 2018.2020.

 

   Ordinary Shares
Beneficially Owned
 

Name

  Shares   Percent 

5% Beneficial Owners

    

RA Capital Management, LLC(1)

   7,512,049    25.6

Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd.(2)

   5,885,478    17.7

Kagoshima Sinsangyo Sousei Investment Limited Partnership(3)

   2,494,865    8.5

Redmile Group, LLC(4)

   2,209,107    7.5

Pfizer Inc.(5)

   1,875,000    6.4

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(6)

   1,726,956    5.9

Directors and Named Executive Officers

    

Paul B. Bolno, M.D.(7)

   846,479    2.8

Christopher Francis, Ph.D.(8)

   106,204    * 

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.(9)

   251,588    * 

Christian Henry(10)

   16,874    * 

Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D.(11)

   7,530,049    25.7

Koji Miura(12)

   18,000    * 

Adrian Rawcliffe(13)

   15,749    * 

Ken Takanashi(14)

   5,903,478    17.8

Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D.(15)

   625,842    2.1

All current directors and executive officers as a
group (11 individuals)(16)

   15,459,345    44.2
   Ordinary Shares
Beneficially Owned
 

Name

  Shares   Percent 

5% Beneficial Owners

    

RA Capital Management, L.P.(1)

   7,775,207    21.8

Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd.(2)

   5,885,478    14.8

Redmile Group, LLC(3)

   3,326,493    9.3

Wellington Management Group LLP(4)

   3,205,313    9.0

RTW Investments, LP(5)

   2,414,027    6.8

BB Biotech AG(6)

   2,402,858    6.7

Kagoshima Shinsangyo Sousei Investment Limited Partnership(7)

   2,134,974    6.0

Pfizer Inc.(8)

   1,875,000    5.2

BlackRock, Inc.(9)

   1,830,620    5.1

Directors and Named Executive Officers

    

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA(10)

   1,042,096    2.9

Keith C. Regnante(11)

   82,202     

Mark Baldry

        

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH(12)

   180,348     

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.(13)

   306,514     

Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D.

        

Christian Henry(14)

   45,374     

Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D.(15)

   7,812,707    21.8

Koji Miura(16)

   37,500     

Amy Pott

        

Adrian Rawcliffe(17)

   44,249     

Ken Takanashi(18)

   5,922,978    14.9

Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D.(19)

   333,902     

Heidi L. Wagner, J.D.

        

Aik Na Tan

        

All current directors and executive officers as a
group (14 individuals)(20)

   15,863,500    38.2

 

*

Represents less than 1% of ordinary shares outstanding on June 15, 2018.2020.

(1)

Based on information reported by RA Capital Management, LLC,L.P., or RA Capital, on Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on November 15, 2017.“RA Capital”. Such shares are held by RA Capital Healthcare Fund, L.P., or the Fund,“Fund,” and in a separately managed account, or the Account.“Account.” RA Capital is the investment manager for the Fund and the Account. The general partner of RA Capital is RA Capital Management GP, LLC, of which Dr. Peter Kolchinsky and Mr. Rajeev Shah are the managing members. Investment decisions with respect to shares held by the Fund and serves as investment advisor for the Account.Account are made by a portfolio management team at RA Capital of which Dr. Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D., a member of our Board, of Directors, is the managera member of RA Capital. RA Capital, andRA Capital Management GP, LLC, Dr. Kolchinsky share voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares andMr. Shah may be deemed to beneficially own such shares. Theindirect beneficial owners of the shares held by the Fund and the Account. RA Capital, RA Capital Management GP, LLC, Dr. Kolchinsky and Mr. Shah expressly disclaim beneficial ownership over all shares held by the Fund and the Account, have pledged an aggregateexcept to the extent of 2,298,398 ordinarytheir pecuniary interest therein, and disclaim any pecuniary interest in the shares which are held on margin in respective Fidelity prime brokerage accounts.by the Account. The address offor RA Capital is 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1200,200 Berkeley Street, 18th Floor, Boston, MA 02116.

(2)

Based on information reported by Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd., or SNBL,“SNBL,” on Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on April 26, 2018.February 20, 2019. Consists of (i) 1,697,467 ordinary shares held by SNBL; (ii) 286,663 ordinary shares held by SNBL USA, Ltd., or SNBL“SNBL USA; (iii) 1,801,348 Series A preferred shares held by SNBL; and (iv) 2,100,000 Series A preferred shares held by SNBL USA. The Series A preferred shares can be converted at any time on aone-for-one basis into ordinary shares at the discretion of the holder. SNBL USA hashad pledged 286,663 ordinary shares for the benefit of The Kagoshima Bank, Ltd., or Kagoshima“Kagoshima Bank, in order to secure the obligations of SNBL under a loan agreement, dated December 28, 2016, between SNBL and Kagoshima Bank. The pledge has released due to expiration of the loan agreement, dated June 27, 2019. SNBL hashad pledged 915,464938,846 ordinary shares for the benefit of Kagoshima Bank in order to secure the obligations of SNBL under a loan agreement, dated September 23, 2016,14, 2018, between SNBL and Kagoshima Bank. SNBLThe pledge has pledged 720,063 ordinary shares forreleased due to expiration of the benefit of Kagoshima Bank and certain other lenders in order to secure the obligations of SNBL under a loan agreement, dated September 15, 2017, between SNBL, Kagoshima Bank and certain other lenders.13, 2019. Ken Takanashi, a member of our Board, of Directors, is a director andan executive officer of SNBL and aan executive officer and director of SNBL USA. SNBL and Mr. Takanashi share voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares and may be deemed to beneficially own such shares. The address of SNBL is St. Luke’s Tower 28F,8-1,Akashi-cho,Chuo-ku, Tokyo28F, 8-1, Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.

 

(3)

Based on information reported by Redmile Group, LLC on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020, such shares are owned by certain private investment vehicles and/or separately managed accounts managed by Redmile Group, LLC, which shares may be deemed beneficially owned by Redmile Group, LLC as investment manager of such private investment vehicles and/or separately managed accounts. These securities may also be deemed beneficially owned by Jeremy C. Green as the principal of Redmile Group, LLC. Redmile Group, LLC and Mr. Green each disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares, except to the extent of its or his pecuniary interest in such shares, if any. The address of Redmile Group, LLC is One Letterman Drive, Building D, SuiteD3-300, The Presidio of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94129.

(4)

Based on information reported by Wellington Management Group LLP on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 28, 2020. These securities are beneficially owned by Wellington Group Holdings LLP, Wellington Investment Advisors LLP and Wellington Management Global Holdings, Ltd., and one or more of the following investment advisers (the “Wellington Investment Advisers”): Wellington Management Company LLP, Wellington Management Canada LLC, Wellington Management Singapore Pte Ltd, Wellington Management Hong Kong Ltd, Wellington Management International Ltd, Wellington Management Japan Pte Ltd and Wellington Management Australia Pty Ltd. The securities as to which this Schedule 13G was filed by Wellington Management Group LLP, as parent holding company of certain holding companies and the Wellington Investment Advisers, are owned of record by clients of the Wellington Investment Advisers. Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP controls directly, or indirectly through Wellington Management Global Holdings, Ltd., the Wellington Investment Advisers. Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP is owned by Wellington Group Holdings LLP. Wellington Group Holdings LLP is owned by Wellington Management Group LLP. The address of these entities is c/o Wellington Management Company LLP, 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210.

(5)

Based on information reported by RTW Investments, LP on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 21, 2020. Such shares are held by RTW Master Fund, Ltd. and one or more private funds (together the “Funds”) managed by RTW Investments, LP. RTW Investments, LP, in its capacity as the investment manager of the Funds, has the power to vote and the power to direct the disposition of all shares held by the Funds. Roderick Wong is the Managing Partner of RTW Investments, LP. Each of the reporting persons disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares reported herein except to the extent of the reporting person’s pecuniary interest therein. The address of RTW Investments, LP and Roderick Wong is 412 West 15th Street, Floor 9, New York, New York 10011. The address of RTW Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Limited, 190 Elgin Avenue, George Town, Grand CaymanKY1-9001, Cayman Islands.

(6)

Based on information reported by BB Biotech AG and Biotech Target N.V on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020. Such shares are held by Biotech Target N.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of BB Biotech AG. The address of BB Biotech AG is Schwertstrasse 6,CH-8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland and the address of Biotech Target N.V. is Ara Hill Top Building,Unit A-5, Pletterijweg Oost 1, Curaçao.

(7)

Based on information reported by Kagoshima Shinsangyo Sousei Investment Limited Partnership, or KSS,“KSS,” on Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on March 22, 2018.14, 2019. Kagoshima Development Co. Ltd., or Kagoshima“Kagoshima Development, is the general partner of KSS. KSS and Kagoshima Development share voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares, and Kagoshima Development may be deemed to beneficially own such shares. The address of KSS is1-10Yamanokuchi-cho, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima,892-0844, Japan.

 

(4)(8)Based on information reported by Redmile Group, LLC on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2018, such shares are held by Redmile Group, LLC or its direct or indirect subsidiaries. Jeremy C. Green is managing member of Redmile Group, LLC and may be deemed to beneficially own such shares. The address of Redmile Group, LLC is One Letterman Drive, Building D, SuiteD3-300, San Francisco, CA 94129.

(5)Based on information reported by Pfizer Inc., on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on May 12, 2016. Such shares are held by C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V., or the Shareholder,“Shareholder,” a Netherlands limited partnership. Pfizer Production LLC and Pfizer Manufacturing LLC, or the General“General Partners, are the general partners for C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. Pfizer Inc. may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over such shares since the Shareholder and the General Partners are indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Pfizer Inc. The General Partners may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over such shares as the general partners of the Shareholder. The address of Pfizer Inc., the General Partners and the Shareholder is 235 E. 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017.

 

(6)(9)

Based on information reported by T. Rowe Price Associates,BlackRock, Inc., or T. Rowe Price, on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2018. T. Rowe Price does not serve as custodian of the assets of any of its clients. Accordingly, in each instance only the client or the client’s custodian or trustee bank has the right to receive dividends paid with respect to, and proceeds from the sale of, such securities. The ultimate power to direct the receipt of dividends paid with respect to, and the proceeds from the sale of, such securities, is vested in the individual and institutional clients which T. Rowe Price serves as investment adviser. Any and all discretionary authority which has been delegated to T. Rowe Price may be revoked in whole or in part at any time.7, 2020. The address of T. Rowe PriceBlackRock, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt55 East 52nd Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.New York, NY 10055.

 

(7)(10)

Consists of (i) 197,217238,433 ordinary shares held by Dr. Bolno and (ii) 649,262803,663 ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2018.2020.

 

(8)(11)

Consists of (i) 1,7279,202 ordinary shares held by Dr. FrancisMr. Regnante and (ii) 104,47773,000 ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2018.2020.

 

(9)(12)

Consists of (i) 2,45017,624 ordinary shares held by Dr. VargeesePanzara and (ii) 249,138162,724 ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2018.2020.

(10)(13)

Consists of (i) 14,607 ordinary shares held by Dr. Vargeese and (ii) 291,907 ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2020.

(14)

Consists of ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2018 held by Mr. Henry.2020.

 

(11)(15)

See Footnote (1) above. Also consists of 18,00037,500 ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 20182020 held by Dr. Kolchinsky.

 

(12)(16)

Consists of ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2018 held by Mr. Miura.2020.

 

(13)(17)

Consists of ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2018 held by Mr. Rawcliffe.2020.

 

(14)(18)

See Footnote (2) above. Also consists of 18,00037,500 ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 20182020 held by Mr. Takanashi.

(15)(19)

Consists of (i) 75,03930,000 ordinary shares held by Dr. Verdine and (ii) 550,803303,902 ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2018.2020.

 

(16)(20)

Consists of (i) 1,768,0761,888,342 ordinary shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 15, 2018,2020, held by our directors and executive officers, (ii) 9,789,92110,073,810 outstanding ordinary shares beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers and entities affiliated with certain of our directors, and (iii) 3,901,348 Series A preferred shares, which can be converted at any time on aone-for-one basis into ordinary shares at the discretion of the holder, held by entities affiliated with one of our directors.

MANAGEMENT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

Pursuant to our Constitution, there is no maximum number of directors that may hold office at any time. Our Board currently consists of seven10 members and each of our directors is elected annually. Our Constitution requires that each of our directors retire at each annual general meeting of our shareholders, and each retiring director is then eligible forre-election.

On June 27, 2018,2, 2020, our Board of Directors accepted the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and voted to nominate Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA, Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D., Christian Henry, Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D., Koji Miura,Amy Pott, Adrian Rawcliffe, Ken Takanashi, and Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D., and Heidi L. Wagner, J.D., each currently a director of the Company, and Aik Na Tan, who is being nominated for the first time this year, for election at the 20182020 AGM. If each such nominee is elected, he or she will serve on our Board of Directors until our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.

Pursuant to the Singapore Companies Act, Chapter 50, (the “Singapore Companies Act”) and our Constitution, our Board must have at least one director who is ordinarily resident in Singapore. Mr. Miura, who is currently our Singapore resident director, is expected to retire upon the conclusion of the 2020 AGM. In connection with Mr. Miura’s retirement, the Board, on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated Aik Na Tan for election as a new director who will act as our Singapore resident director. In accordance with the requirements of the Singapore Companies Act that we have at least one director who is ordinarily resident in Singapore in office at all times, in the event that Ms. Tan is not elected at the 2020 AGM, Mr. Miura will continue in office after the 2020 AGM as a member of our Board until his qualifying successor (i.e., a Singapore resident director) is appointed. If Ms. Tan is elected at the 2020 AGM, Mr. Miura will retire upon the conclusion of the 2020 AGM.

Set forth below are the names of theour directors and persons nominated as directors,director nominee, their ages as of June 15, 2018,2020, their offices in the Company, if any, their principal occupations or employment for at least the past five years, the length of their tenure as directors and the names of other public companies in which such personsthey hold or have held directorships during the past five years. Additionally,In addition, information about the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to our Board of Directors’Board’s conclusion at the time of filing of this proxy statement that each person listed below should serve as a director is set forth below.

 

Name

  Age   

Position/Title

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA

   4446   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Christian Henry

   5052   Chairman of the Board of Directors

Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D.

62Director

Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D.

   4143   Director

Koji Miura

   6971Director

Amy Pott

43   Director

Adrian Rawcliffe

   4648   Director

Ken Takanashi

   5456   Director

Aik Na Tan

49Director Nominee

Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D.

   5961Director

Heidi L. Wagner, J.D.

55   Director

Our Board of Directors has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of our directors has with the Company, either directly or indirectly. Based upon this review, our Board has determined that the following members of the Board are “independent directors” as defined by the Nasdaq Stock Market: Dr. Kolchinsky and Messrs. Henry, Miura, Rawcliffe and Takanashi.

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBAhas served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2013 and as a director since December 2013.April 2014. Prior to joining us, he served at GlaxoSmithKline from 2009 to 2013 in various roles, including Vice President, Worldwide Business Development—Head of Asia BD and Investments,

Head of Global Neuroscience BD, a director of Glaxo Welcome Manufacturing, Pte. Ltd. in Singapore and Vice President, Business Development for the Oncology Business Unit, where he helped establish GlaxoSmithKline’s global oncology business and served as a member of the Oncology Executive Team, Oncology Commercial Board and Cancer Research Executive Team. Prior to GlaxoSmithKline, he served as director of Research at Two River LLC, a health care private equity firm from 2004 to 2009. Dr. Bolno earned a medical degree fromMCP-Hahnemann School of Medicine and an M.B.A. from Drexel University. He was a general surgery resident and cardiothoracic surgery postdoctoral research fellow at Drexel University College of Medicine. We believe that Dr. Bolno’s experience serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors and his experience leading biopharmaceutical companies qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors.Board.

Christian Henryhas served as a director since November 2016, and as Chairman of our Board of Directors since October 2017. Mr. Henry also serves on the board of directors of Ginkgo Bioworks, a private synthetic biology company, and Pacific Biosciences, a publicly traded life sciences company. Mr. Henry served as Executive Vice President & Chief Commercial Officer of Illumina, Inc. from 2015 through January 2017, and previously served as Senior Vice President & Chief Commercial Officer from 2014 to 2015, Senior Vice President & General Manager Genomic Solutions from 2012 to 2014, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & General Manager Life Sciences from 2010 to 2012, Senior Vice

President, Corporate Development & Chief Financial Officer from 2009 to 2010, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2009, and Vice President & Chief Financial Officer from 2005 to 2006. Prior to joining Illumina, Inc., Mr. Henry served as the Chief Financial Officer of Tickets.com, Inc. from 2003 to 2005. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Henry served as Vice President, Finance & Corporate Controller of Affymetrix, Inc. (acquired by Thermo Fisher Scientific in 2016). In 1997, Mr. Henry joined Nektar Therapeutics (formerly Inhale Therapeutic Systems, Inc.), as Corporate Controller, and later as its Chief Accounting Officer from 1997 to 1999. In 1996, Mr. Henry served as General Accounting Manager of Sugen, Inc. Mr. Henry began his career in 1992 at Ernst & Young LLP, where he was a Senior Accountant through 1996. Mr. Henry earned his B.A. in biochemistry and cell biology from the University of California, San Diego, and his M.B.A., with a concentration in finance, from the University of California, Irvine. We believe he is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his strengths in corporate strategy, finance and operations, along with his extensive experience leading various functions at one of the largest and most innovative genetic healthcare companies.

Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D. has served as a director since September 2019. Dr. Corrigan served as the Chief Executive Officer of Correvio Pharma Corp. from March 2019 through May 2020. Prior to joining Correvio, Dr. Corrigan was President of Research and Development at Tremeau Pharmaceuticals from 2016 to March 2019. Dr. Corrigan served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Zalicus, Inc. (formerly CombinatoRx) from 2010 to 2014. Prior to that time, from 2003 to 2009, Dr. Corrigan held the role of Executive Vice President, Research and Development at Sepracor Inc. From 2000 to 2003, Dr. Corrigan served as Group Vice President, Clinical Research & Experimental Medicine at Pharmacia Corporation. Prior to this, Dr. Corrigan held various roles at The Upjohn Company, The University of North Carolina, and the National Institute of Mental Health Center for Psychoneuroendocrinology in Adults and Children at Dorthea Dix Hospital. Dr. Corrigan currently serves as a member of the boards of directors of Nabriva Therapeutics and Tremeau Pharmaceuticals, of which he is aco-founder. Dr. Corrigan holds an M.D. from the University of Virginia and received specialty training in psychiatry at Maine Medical Center and Cornell University. He received a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from the University of Virginia. We believe he is qualified to serve on our Board because of his experience as a board member, board committee member and chief executive officer of publicly-traded biopharmaceutical companies.

Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D. has served as a director since January 2015. Dr. Kolchinsky is a founder Portfolio Manager, and Managing DirectorPartner of RA Capital Management, LLC,L.P., a multi-stage investment manager which is dedicated to evidence-based investing in healthcare and life science companies that are developing drugs, medical devices, and diagnostics, where he has worked since 2001. RA Capital Management, LLCL.P. is the general partnerinvestment manager of RA Capital Healthcare Fund, L.P. He serves as a member of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, as well asForma Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., in addition to a number of private companies. Dr. Kolchinsky authored “Entrepreneur’s Guidealso leads RA Capital’s engagement and publishing efforts, which aim to make a Biotech Startup”positive social impact and spark collaboration among

healthcare stakeholders, including patients, physicians, researchers, policymakers, and industry. He served on the Board of Global Science and Technology for the National AcademicsAcademy of Sciences from 2009 to 2012.2012, is the author of “The Great American Drug Deal” and “The Entrepreneur’s Guide to a Biotech Startup”, and frequently writes and speaks on the future of biotechnology innovation. Dr. Kolchinsky earned his Ph.D. in virology from Harvard University and earned his bachelor’s degree in Biology from Cornell University. We believe Dr. Kolchinsky is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his business experience including his experience as an institutional investor and his experience serving on the boards of various healthcare and life science companies.

Koji Miura has served as a director since October 2012. Mr. Miura is the founder and Managing Director of Miura & Associates Management Consultants Pte. Ltd. and serves on the boards of directors of Azeus Systems Holdings Ltd., Marine Tec Tachibana Pte. Ltd., Matsuura Singapore Pte. Ltd., Mercury Investment Holding Pte. Ltd., Sunmoon Pte. Ltd., and Triple Farm Singapore Pte. Ltd. Mr. Miura holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Aoyama Gakuin, Tokyo, Japan. We believe he is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his broad business experience including his diverse background serving on the board of directors of various companies, both private and publicly-held, across multiple industries.

Amy Pott has served as a director since September 2019. Ms. Pott currently serves as President, North America for Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (SOBI), where she has worked since April 2019. Prior to joining SOBI, Ms. Pott served as Group Vice President, U.S. Franchise Head, Internal Medicine and Oncology from 2017 to April 2019, and as Group Vice President, U.S. Commercial Operations in 2016 at Shire Plc. From 2015 to 2016, Ms. Pott held the role of Vice President, Global Market Access and Vice President, Strategy, Planning and Analytics at Baxalta, Inc. Prior to joining Baxalta, Ms. Pott served in various roles at Baxter Healthcare Corporation, including Director, Business Model Innovation, Europe from 2014 to 2015; Director, Market Access and Evolving Health UK & Ireland from 2012 to 2014; Director, Market Access UK & Ireland from 2009 to 2012; Director, UK Government Affairs, Public Policy and Communications from 2004 to 2009, and Manager, UK Government Affairs & Public Policy in 2004. Prior to this time, Ms. Pott also served in various roles at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, NHS Confederation, APCO Worldwide LLC, and the House of Lords (London, UK). Ms. Pott earned a Master of Science from the London School of Economics, and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Bristol. We believe she is qualified to serve on our Board because of her extensive experience as an executive leading commercial operations within rare disease pharmaceutical companies.

Adrian Rawcliffe has served as a director since February 2017. Since September 2019, Mr. Rawcliffe currently serveshas served as the Chief FinancialExecutive Officer of Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, whereplc. From 2015 to September 2019, he has worked since 2015.served as Adaptimunne’s Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Adaptimmune, Mr. Rawcliffe served in various roles at GlaxoSmithKline plc, including Senior Vice President Finance, North America Pharmaceuticals and Global Franchises from 2011 to 2015; Senior Vice President, Worldwide Business Development and R&D Finance from 2006 to 2011; Vice President, Worldwide Business Development Transactions and Ventures from 2003 to 2005; and Vice President, Deal Structuring from 2001 to 2003. From 2005 to 2006, Mr. Rawcliffe served as the President and Managing Partner of SR One Ltd. Mr. Rawcliffe began his career as a supervisor at Coopers & Lybrand (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) from 1993 to 1997. Mr. Rawcliffe received his B.Sc. in Natural Sciences from the University of Durham, England. Mr. Rawcliffe also received Chartered Accountancy training through The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). We believe he is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his global expertise, along with extensive business and operating experience at one of the world’s largest global healthcare companies.

Ken Takanashi has served as a director since July 2012. Since 2002, Mr. Takanashi has served in various executive management and director roles at Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories Ltd., or SNBL,“SNBL,” and its affiliates and currently serves as its Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Takanashi was the Chief Financial Officer of SNBL USA, Ltd., a subsidiary of Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, from 2012 to 2014. Mr. Takanashi also serves on the board of directors of Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Takanashi earned an M.B.A. from the University of Warwick and received his

bachelor’s degree from

the University of Tokyo and is a Chartered Public Accountant. We believe he is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his extensive experience leading research and development for biopharmaceutical companies and his business, financial and accounting credentials.

Aik Na Tan is being nominated for election as a new director at the 2020 AGM. Ms. Tan currently serves as Senior Vice-President (Administration) at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU), a position she has held since January 2020. From when she joined NTU in August 2016 to December 2017, she served as NTU’s Chief Financial Officer. She also served as NTU’s Chief Administrative Officer from April 2017 to December 2017 and as NTU’s Vice-President (Administration) from January 2018 to December 2019. Prior to joining NTU, Ms. Tan served as Global Finance Transformation Leader & Managing Director of the Chemours Company Singapore Pte Ltd, aspin-off from DuPont, from 2015 to 2016. From 1994 through 2015, Ms. Tan held numerous global and regional leadership roles at DuPont in accounting, corporate treasury, six sigma, financial systems, supply chain, operations, financial and strategic planning, including various positions at DuPont Company (Singapore) Pte Ltd, most recently serving as the Chief Financial Officer of DuPont Titanium Technologies from November 2011 to February 2015. Ms. Tan began her professional career as a tax assistant at Price Waterhouse. Ms. Tan holds a Bachelor of Accountancy degree from the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and is a member of the Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants. We believe she is qualified to serve on our Board because of her extensive experience as a chief financial officer and chief administrative officer, her broad operations experience working in Singapore-incorporated companies, her experience working on boards of directors and committees thereof, as well as her business, financial and accounting credentials.

Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D., is one of our founders and has served as a director since July 2013. He was our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific Officer from our inception through December 2013 and served as Chairman of our Board of Directors from July 2013 through September 2017. Since 1989, Dr. Verdine has served as the Erving Professor of Chemistry in the Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University and Harvard Medical School.School; he is now Erving Professor of Chemistry, Emeritus. Dr. Verdineco-founded thenon-profit Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute and Gloucester Biotechnology Academy in 2013 and served as the Founding President until 2016. He is theco-founder of Fog Pharmaceuticals Inc. and LifeMine Therapeutics Inc. andcurrently serves as Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific OfficerCEO for both companies.the company. He is also Chairman, CEO and CSO of LifeMine Therapeutics Inc. He is also the founder of Warp Drive Bio (merged with Revolution Medicines, Inc. (Nasdaq: RVMD)) and has served in various roles, from Chief Scientific Officer to Chief Executive Officer, from the company’s inception in 2012 until April 2016. Dr. Verdine founded Enanta Pharmaceuticals and served as a member of the Boardits board of directors from 1990 through its initial public offering in 2013. He is a Venture Partner at WuXi Healthcare Ventures, and has previously served as Venture Partner at AppleTree Ventures, TPG Biotech and Third Rock Ventures. He has served on the Board of Scientific Counsellors of the National Cancer Institute, and is on the Board of Scientific Consultants of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and he is a Senior Advisor to Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories Ltd. Dr. Verdine is also theco-founder of Eleven Biotherapeutics, Tokai Therapeutics, Aileron Therapeutics, and Gloucester Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Celgene in 2010). He has also served as a director of the Chemical Biology Initiative and the Program in Cancer Chemical Biology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Dr. Verdine received his Ph.D. in Chemistry from Columbia University and completed postdoctoral work in Molecular Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Medical School. We believe he is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his expertise and deep knowledge of our company, its technology and our industry and his long track record of creating and advising successful biopharmaceutical companies.

PursuantHeidi L. Wagner, J.D. has served as a director since September 2019. Ms. Wagner currently serves as Senior Vice President, Government Affairs and Policy at Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., where she has worked since 2018. Prior to joining Global Blood Therapeutics, Ms. Wagner served as Senior Vice President, Global Governmental Affairs at Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2012 to 2018, and as Vice President, Global Government Affairs from 2009 to 2012. Ms. Wagner held the Singapore Companies Act, Chapter 50, or the “Singapore Companies Act,”role of Senior Director of Government Affairs at Genentech, Inc. from 2000 to 2009, and our Constitution, our Board must haveas Director, Government Affairs from 1998 to 1999. Prior to that time, she served as Health Policy Director and Consultant at least one director who is ordinarily residentHealthcare Leadership Council, and in Singapore. Mr. Miura is our Singapore resident director. Due to the Singapore Companies Act requirement that we havevarious roles at least one director who is ordinarily resident in Singapore in office at all times

Epstein Becker & Green and Groom & Nordberg, and the sole resident director cannot resign or step down unless there is at least one other resident director, in the event that Mr. Miura is not elected at the 2018 AGM, he will continue in office after the 2018 AGMU.S. House of Representatives. Ms. Wagner currently serves as a member of the board of directors of the American Kidney Fund, as a Trustee of the University of Colorado Foundation, and as an advisory board member of the University of Colorado, College of Media, Communication and Information. From 2015 to 2018, she also served as a member of the board of directors of the European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs. Ms. Wagner earned a J.D. from George Mason University School of Law, and received a Bachelor of Science in Journalism and Mass Communication from the University of Colorado. We believe she is qualified to serve on our Board until his qualifying successor (i.e.because of her experience as a government affairs executive driving strategy for government policy, pricing, reimbursement and patient access for biopharmaceutical companies.

Director Independence

Our Board believes that independence is one important component of a high-functioning board capable of objective decision-making that represents the long-term interests of shareholders and the Company. Since the Company’s initial public offering in 2015, our Board has enhanced its independence by replacing two previous directors—a founder and a representative of an investor—with two directors, who are independent and not affiliated with any of our principal shareholders, Christian Henry and Adrian Rawcliffe, and also enhanced our Board’s independent leadership by appointing Mr. Henry as its independent Chairman. In September 2019, we further strengthened our Board’s independence by appointing three additional independent directors, Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D., a Singapore resident director)Amy Pott, and Heidi L. Wagner, J.D. In addition, we are now proposing to further strengthen our Board’s independence with Aik Na Tan, who is appointed.being nominated for the first time this year for election at the 2020 AGM. Our Board is committed to ensuring that its members reflect an appropriate level of independence in conjunction with the combination of qualifications, qualities and skills required to exercise its duties and responsibilities and serve the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Nasdaq rules, we hold executive sessions of our independent directors in conjunction with our regularly scheduled board meetings and otherwise as appropriate. In addition, our Compensation Committee meets in executive session with no members of management present, as necessary or appropriate, to address various compensation matters, including deliberations regarding our Chief Executive Officer’s performance and compensation.

Our Board has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of our directors has with the Company, either directly or indirectly. Based upon this review, our Board has determined that the following members of the Board or nominees for director are “independent directors” as defined by the Nasdaq Stock Market: Mses. Pott, Tan and Wagner, Drs. Kolchinsky and Corrigan, and Messrs. Henry, Miura, Rawcliffe and Takanashi.

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meetings

Meeting Attendance. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, there were six meetings of our Board, of Directors, and the various committees of the Board met a total of 1215 times. No director with the exception of Masaharu Tanaka, who served as a director from January 1, 2017 through August 10, 2017, the date of our 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of committees of the Board on which hesuch director served during 2017.2019. The Board has adopted a policy under which our directors are encouraged to attend our annual general meetings of shareholders. One director attended our 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which was held on August 10, 2017. As a Singapore company, we are required to prepare annual Singapore statutory audited financial statements (our “second annual audit”) and to deliver them to our shareholders in connection with our annual general meetings of shareholders. Our second annual audit can only be conducted following our first annual audit, which requires our preparation and filing of annual U.S. GAAP audited consolidated financial statements with the SEC. As a result, these multiple audits do not allow us to schedule our quarterly board meetings at the same time as our annual general meetings of shareholders.shareholders and we typically hold our annual general meetings during the summertime.

Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee held fourseven meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019. Our Audit Committee currently has threefour members: Mr. Henry (Chairman), Dr. Corrigan, and Messrs. Miura and

Rawcliffe. During the period of January 1, 2019 through September 23, 2019, our Audit Committee was comprised of Messrs. Henry (Chairman), Miura and Rawcliffe. On February 1, 2017, Mr. Rawcliffe replaced Masaharu Tanaka, who served as a director of our Board during 2017 from January 1, 2017 through August 10, 2017, the date of our 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders,September 24, 2019,

Dr. Corrigan joined as a member of our Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Audit Committee’s written charter and include the responsibility to retain and terminate the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews annual financial statements, considers matters relating to accounting policy and internal controls and reviews the scope of annual audits.

Dr. Corrigan and Messrs. Henry, Miura and Rawcliffe satisfy the current independence standards promulgated by the SEC and by the Nasdaq Stock Market, as such standards apply specifically to members of audit committees. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the financial literacy requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and that each of Messrs. Henry and Rawcliffe qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as the SEC has defined that term in Item 407 of RegulationS-K.

A copy of the Audit Committee’s written charter is publicly available on our website at www.wavelifesciences.com.

Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee met fourfive times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019. The Compensation Committee currently has three members: Mr. Henry (Chairman), Dr. Kolchinsky and Ms. Pott. During the period of January 1, 2019 through September 23, 2019, our Compensation Committee was comprised of Mr. Henry (Chairman), Dr. Kolchinsky and Mr. Takanashi. On March 9, 2017,September 24, 2019, Ms. Pott replaced Mr. Henry joinedTakanashi as a member of our Compensation Committee and, on December 12, 2017, replaced Dr. Kolchinsky as the Chairman of our Compensation Committee. During the period of January 1, 2017 through March 9, 2017, our Compensation Committee was comprised of two members, Dr. Kolchinsky (Chairman) and Mr. Takanashi. Our Compensation Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Compensation Committee’s written charter and includesinclude reviewing, approving and making recommendations regarding our compensation policies, practices and procedures to ensure that legal and fiduciary responsibilities of the Board of Directors are carried out and that such policies, practices and procedures contribute to our success. Our Compensation Committee also administers our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2014 Equity Incentive Plan”) and our 2019 Employee Share Purchase Plan (the “2019 ESPP”). The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of our executive officers.

Each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as independent under the definition promulgated by the Nasdaq Stock Market.

A copy of the Compensation Committee’s written charter is publicly available on our website at www.wavelifesciences.com.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met fourthree times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently has three members: Mr. Henry (Chairman), Mr. Takanashi and Ms. Wagner. During the period of January 1, 2019 through September 23, 2019 our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was comprised of Mr. Henry (Chairman), Mr. Takanashi and Dr. Kolchinsky. On March 9, 2017, Mr. Henry joinedSeptember 24, 2019, Ms. Wagner replaced Dr. Kolchinsky as a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, on December 12, 2017, replaced Mr. Takanashi as the Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. During the period of January 1, 2017 through March 9, 2017, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was comprised of two members, Mr. Takanashi (Chairman) and Dr. Kolchinsky. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s written charter and include evaluating and making recommendations to the full Board as to the size and composition of the Board and its committees, evaluating and making recommendations as to potential candidates, and evaluating current Board members’ performance.

Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee qualifies as independent under the definition promulgated by the Nasdaq Stock Market.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to serve as directors, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and recommending the persons to be nominated for election as directors, except where we are legally required by contract, law or otherwise to provide third parties with the right to nominate.

The process followed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to identify and evaluate director candidates includes making requests to Board members and others for recommendations, holding meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and reviewing background material relating to potential candidates and interviews of selected candidates by members of the committee and the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also authorized by its charter to retain search firms to identify director candidates. The qualifications, qualities and skills that the committee believes must be met by a committee-recommended nominee for a position on our Board of Directors are as follows:

 

Nominees should have a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to high ethical standards.

 

Nominees should have demonstrated business acumen, experience and ability to exercise sound judgments in matters that relate to the Company’s current and long-term objectives and should be willing and able to contribute positively to the Company’s decision-making process.

 

Nominees should have a commitment to understand the Company and its industry and to regularly attend and participate in meetings of the Board and its committees.

 

Nominees should have the interest and ability to understand the sometimes conflicting interests of our various constituencies, which include shareholders, employees, customers, governmental units, creditors and the general public, and to act in the interests of all shareholders.

 

Nominees should not have, nor appear to have, a conflict of interest that would impair the nominee’s ability to represent the interests of all of our shareholders and to fulfill the responsibilities of a director.

 

Nominees shall not be discriminated against on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, disability or any other basis proscribed by law. The value of diversityDiversity on theour Board is considered.highly valued and is actively considered in the nomination process as well as in the Board’s annual performance evaluation.

 

Nominees should normally be able to serve for at least five years before reaching the age of 70.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers issues of diversity among its members in identifying and considering nominees for director, and strives where appropriate to achieve a diverse balance of backgrounds, perspectives, experience, age, gender, ethnicity and country of citizenship on the Board and its committees. The value of many forms of diversity is reflected on our Board, and we believe that our current Board represents diversity of thought, background and experience, as well as diversity of personal characteristics such as gender, ethnicity and age. The Board is committed to seeking out highly qualified women and minority candidates, as well as candidates with diverse backgrounds, skills and experiences as part of each search for qualified directors the Company undertakes. The Board’s commitment to gender diversity was demonstrated by the 2019 appointments of two female directors to our Board and its committees, and again more recently demonstrated by our Board’s nomination of Aik Na Tan for election at the 2020 AGM.

A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s written charter isand our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which set forth our nominee requirements are publicly available on our website at www.wavelifesciences.com.

Procedures by which Shareholders may Nominate Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall review and evaluate information available to it regarding candidates proposed by shareholders and shall apply the same criteria, and shall follow substantially the same process in considering them, as it does in considering other candidates. The factors generally considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set out in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are publicly available on the “For Investors & Media” section of our website at http://ir.wavelifesciences.com/ under the heading “Corporate Governance.” If a shareholder wishes to nominate a candidate to be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for election as a director at the 2019our 2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders,

it must give timely notice of the nomination in writing to our General Counsel not less than 45 days prior to the date that is one year from the date on which we first mail our proxy statement relating to our 2018 AGM of Shareholders.the 2020 AGM. All shareholder proposals should be marked for the attention of General Counsel, Wave Life Sciences Ltd., 733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our Compensation Committee currently has three members: Mr. Henry (Chairman), Dr. Kolchinsky and Ms. Pott. During 2017, the membersperiod of January 1, 2019 through September 23, 2019, our Compensation Committee was comprised of Mr. Henry (Chairman), Dr. Kolchinsky and Mr. Takanashi. On September 24, 2019, Ms. Pott replaced Mr. Takanashi as a member of our Compensation Committee were Dr. Kolchinsky and Messrs. Henry and Takanashi.Committee. Dr. Kolchinsky is the managing memberManaging Partner of RA Capital Management, LLC,L.P., the general partnerinvestment manager of RA Capital Healthcare Fund, L.P., one of our shareholders. Mr. Takanashi is a director and executive officer of Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories Ltd. and its affiliates, one of our shareholders. We have entered into certain transactions with affiliates of RA Capital Healthcare Fund, L.P. and Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories Ltd., as further described under “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” below.

No officer or employee has served as a member of the Compensation Committee. None of our executive officers serve as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

Familial Relationships

There are no familial relationships between any of our executive officers and directors.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

The positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are presently separated at the Company. We believe that separating these positions allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on ourday-to-day business, while allowing our Chairman of the Board to lead the Board of Directors in its fundamental role of providing advice to, and independent oversight of, management. Our Board of Directors recognizes the time, effort and energy that the Chief Executive Officer is required to devote to his position in the current business environment, as well as the commitment required to serve as our Chairman, particularly as the Board of Directors’Board’s oversight responsibilities continue to grow. Our Board of Directors also believes that this structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of our Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing priorities and procedures for the work of our Board of Directors.Board. The Board retains the authority to modify this leadership structure as and when appropriate to best address the Company’s unique circumstances at any given time and to serve the best interests of our shareholders.

Our Board of Directors oversees the risk management activities designed and implemented by our management. Our Board of Directors executes its oversight responsibility for risk management both directly and through its committees. Our Board of Directors also considers specific risk topics, including risks associated with our strategic plan, business operations and capital structure. In addition, our Board of Directors receives detailed regular reports from members of our management team and other personnel that include assessments and potential mitigation of the risks and exposures involved with their respective areas of responsibility. Our Board has received regular updates on the evolvingCOVID-19 situation from and has discussed these updates with our management team, including with regard to our operations, clinical trial enrollment, financial position and liquidity, communications strategy and employee matters, among other items. As part of Directorsits risk management oversight, our Board has been working with our management team to identify and monitorCOVID-19 related risks to our Company, and is involved in strategy decisions and other actions we are taking to mitigate risks related to the impact ofCOVID-19 on our business.

Our Board may delegate to the Audit Committee oversight of our risk management process. Our other Board committees will also consider and address risk as they perform their respective committee responsibilities. Specifically, the Audit Committee receives regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal, regulatory, strategic and reputational risks.

As part of its charter, our Audit Committee regularly discusses with management our major risk exposures, their potential financial impact on our Company and the steps we take to manage them. Our Compensation Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management and risks arising from our compensation policies and programs. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure, succession planning for our directors and executive officers and corporate governance. All committees report to the full Board of Directors as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.

Corporate Sustainability Matters

As we work to build a world-class organization to develop a new class of oligonucleotide therapeutics, we are increasingly focused on key environmental, social and governance risks and on providing transparency around our ESG efforts. The Company is committed to investments in human capital management, patient advocacy and community outreach efforts, and implementing environmental sustainability initiatives.

Environmental Factors: As we continue to expand our operations, we have initiated certain projects to begin tracking our environmental impact, and where feasible, have taken measures to increase our sustainability efforts. Some of our efforts include our commitment to reduce, reuse or recycle where possible or appropriate; energy efficient projects to lower energy use within our office areas and laboratories; and having processes in place that send over 95% of hazardous waste to an energy conversion center.

Social Factors: We recognize that maintaining an engaged andtop-notch workforce and a connection with the communities we serve is critical to our success. Comradery and cohesion are at the core of who we are as a company and are integral facets of our human capital management. Whether it is coming together throughout the year to meet as “One Wave” at our town halls or participating in a global walking challenge to support the health and well-being of our employees, we take a team approach to our work .

We understand that in order to drive innovation, we must continuously improve our human capital strategies and find ways to foster engagement and growth for our employees. To this end, below are some of the initiatives in which we are engaged:

Employee Engagement: We conduct an annual employee engagement survey as a means of measuring employee engagement and satisfaction, as well as a tool for improving our human capital strategies in the year ahead. Approximately 90% of our employees participated in our 2019 employee engagement survey, of which over 90% reported that they were highly or moderately engaged and are inspired by the work we do.

Employee Health and Safety: As we continue to monitor the global spread ofCOVID-19, we have implemented and will continue to implement measures to ensure the safety of our employees and our patients. Compliance with environmental, health and safety (EH&S) laws and regulations underlies the basis of the EH&S programs we have in place. The EH&S management system incorporates processes to proactively assess risks to the health and safety of our employees and the community, as well as tracking compliance, incidents, inspections, and corrective actions. Our training program provides enhanced training to individuals that is parallel to the level of risk exposure to ensure that employees always have the knowledge and equipment at hand to mitigate risk.

Professional Development Program:In 2019, we implemented a personal development plan training program, along with leadership and management development programs. Through development planning, we strive for employees at all levels to focus on strengthening the skills required in their current role or a potential future role and creating opportunities for growth and development. We also conduct formal annual performance reviews for all employees, but as importantly, we encourage feedback and open communication between managers and their direct reports throughout the entire year. In addition, we offer certain employees tuition reimbursement for eligible expenses through our education assistance program.

Wave Learning Series:In 2019, we developed the Wave Learning Series to build awareness of all functional areas at Wave, and to expand knowledge of industry trends and other matters of interest and relevance within the biopharmaceutical industry throughout our organization. The Wave Learning Series is conducted through company-wide presentations by employees at various levels throughout the organization, providing opportunities for development and cross-functional exposure for our employees.

Diversity and Inclusion:Our commitment to growing atop-performing company means investing in and creating ongoing opportunities for employee development in a diverse and inclusive environment in which each team member plays a unique and vital role. We believe that a diverse workforce not only positively impacts our performance and strengthens our culture, but it also cultivates an essential pipeline of experienced leaders for management. Hiring for diversity of thought, background and experience, and diversity of personal characteristics such as gender, race and ethnicity is intentional at Wave and continues to be an area of focus as we build our workforce. Despite the historical lack of institutional emphasis on the importance of girls and women focusing on education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (“STEM”) and the resulting disproportionate occupation by men in the STEM-educated talent pool, the Company has prioritized and hired a gender diverse workforce. As of June 15, 2020, women make up approximately 50% of our global workforce and constitute approximately 31% of management. We are also committed to building a racially and ethnically diverse workforce. As of June 15, 2020, racially diverse employees (those self-identifying as Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Asian, or being two or more races) make up approximately 44% of our global workforce and approximately 19% of management (9% of our employees did not provide us with this information).

Community Outreach and Engagement: Our community engagement activities are focused on seeking to better understand the lives of people living with rare disease and identifying opportunities to support the rare disease community. We believe that partnering with and understanding the lives of patients and their families differentiates Wave and enhances our ability to discover and develop potential therapies. Through collaboration with patients, families and advocacy organizations,face-to-face meetings, and participation in patient-focused conferences and community events, we aim to broaden our understanding of the needs of patients and families and incorporate those critical learnings into every aspect of our company. These insights inform the design and execution of our clinical trials, the enrichment of our corporate culture, and the development of programs and services that make a positive impact on people’s lives. Employee volunteerism is another important component of our community engagement initiatives. We partner with advocacy and service organizations to provide opportunities for employees to contribute directly to our local communities. By participating in a broad range of volunteer activities, our employees donate time and resources to support patients and families in the rare disease community.

We will continue to invest in our employees, culture, community partnerships and outreach, and environmental efforts, and anticipate reporting on other corporate sustainability measures over time.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

We maintain an Insider Trading Policy that, among other things, prohibits all officers, including our named executive officers, directors and employees from engaging in “hedging” transactions with respect to our ordinary shares. This prohibition includes short sales, hedging of share ownership positions, transactions in straddles, collars or other similar risk reduction or hedging devices, and transactions involving derivative securities relating to our ordinary shares. In addition, those subject to our Insider Trading Policy are also prohibited from pledging our securities as collateral for a loan; provided, however, that (i) any pledge arrangement which existed prior to the adoption of our Insider Trading Policy in connection with our initial public offering, was grandfathered and need not be unwound solely due to the adoption of this policy; and (ii) exceptions may be granted for pledge arrangements where our personnel wish to pledge our securities as collateral for a loan (other than a margin loan)

and can demonstrate the financial wherewithal to repay the loan without having to resort to the pledged securities.

Shareholder Communications to the Board

Generally, shareholders who have questions or concerns or who wish to address questions regarding our business directly with the Board, of Directors, or any individual director, should direct his or her questions in writing to IR@wavelifesci.com. Communications will be distributed to the Board, or to any individual director or directors as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communications. Items that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board may be excluded, such as junk mail and mass mailings, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys and solicitations or advertisements. In addition, any material that is unduly hostile, threatening, or illegal in nature may be excluded, provided that any communication that is filtered out will be made available to any outside director upon request.

Executive Officers

Set forth below is information as of June 15, 20182020, regarding our executive officers who are not also directors. We have employment agreements with certain of our executive officers and all of our executive officers are generallyat-will employees.

 

Name

  Age   

Title

Christopher Francis, Ph.D.

   4042   

Senior Vice President, Corporate Development,

Head of Emerging Areas

David Gaiero

42Interim Chief Financial Officer

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

   51Franchise Lead, Neurology

Keith C. Regnante

4853   Chief FinancialMedical Officer

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

   5759   Senior Vice President, Drug DiscoveryChief Technology Officer

Christopher Francis, Ph.D. has served as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, Head of Emerging Areas since May 2017. During the period January 2017 to May 2017, Dr. Francis served as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Development & Portfolio Management. Prior to that, Dr. Francis served as our Vice President, Head of Business Development since April 2014. Prior to joining us, Dr. Francis held senior operational, strategic and business development roles within GlaxoSmithKline Oncology from 2009 to 2014 and was a member of the team that established GlaxoSmithKline’s Rare Disease Unit. Before GlaxoSmithKline, Dr. Francis was a health care private equity associate at Two River LLC from 2008 to 2009. He began his career in pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement consulting at IMS Health. Dr. Francis earned undergraduate and graduate degrees in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the University of Melbourne and was a doctoral research associate at the University of Cambridge.

David Gaiero has served as our Interim Chief Financial Officer since January 2020. Prior to this appointment, Mr. Gaiero served as our Vice President, Corporate Controller since July 2017. Prior to joining us, from 2015 to 2017 Mr. Gaiero served as Vice President, Global Controller of OvaScience, Inc. and from 2007 to 2015 he held various positions of increasing responsibility and scope in finance and accounting at iRobot Corporation. Mr. Gaiero began his career in public accounting at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Gaiero received a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and is a Certified Public Accountant in Massachusetts.

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPHjoined us has served as our Chief Medical Officer since November 2018. During the period July 2016 to October 2018, Dr. Panzara served as our Franchise Lead, Neurology in July 2016.Neurology. Prior to joining us, Dr. Panzara served in various roles at Sanofi Genzyme (and Genzyme Corporation before its merger with Sanofi in 2011) from 2009 to July 2016, most recently serving as Head of the Multiple Sclerosis, Neurology and Ophthalmology Therapeutic Area for Global Development and prior to that, serving as Group Vice President, Therapeutic Area Head, Multiple Sclerosis and Neurology. Prior to joining Genzyme, Dr. Panzara served in roles

of increasing responsibility at Biogen, including Vice President, Chief Medical Officer, Neurology from 2006 to 2009 and in various roles in the Medical Research group from 2001 to 2006. In addition, from 1999 to 2011, Dr. Panzara was an Instructor in Neurology at Harvard Medical School and an Assistant in Neurology at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). He trained in neurology at MGH from 1994 to 1998, and completed his post-doctoral training in immunology and rheumatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr. Panzara holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania, a medical degree from Stanford University School of Medicine, and a master’s degree in public health from the Harvard School of Public Health.

Keith C. Regnante has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2016. Prior to joining us, from February 2014 to August 2016, Mr. Regnante served as Vice President of Finance at Shire Pharmaceuticals, a global biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Regnante also served on the Financial Leadership Team and the R&D Leadership Team while he was at Shire. From September 2013 to February 2014, he served as Head of R&D

Finance for ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. From January 1999 to August 2013, Mr. Regnante held multiple positions within finance for Biogen Inc., including Senior Director of Corporate Finance from 2011 to 2013, Senior Director of Worldwide R&D Finance from 2008 to 2011, and several other positions dating back to 1999. Prior to joining finance organizations for biotechnology companies, Mr. Regnante worked as a consultant at The Boston Consulting Group. He holds a B.A. in Economics from Tufts University and an M.B.A. from the MIT Sloan School of Management.

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D. has served as our Chief Technology Officer since June 2020. During the period of August 2014 to June 2020, Dr. Vargeese served as Senior Vice President, Head of Drug Discovery since August 2014.Discovery. Before joining us, Dr. Vargeese served as Novartis’ Executive Director and Head of RNA Chemistry and Delivery, a position she held from 2008 to 2014. Prior to joining Novartis, Dr. Vargeese led siRNA delivery in the RNA Therapeutics division at Merck & Co., where she served as Senior Director and Head of RNA Chemistry and Delivery. Dr. Vargeese joined Merck through its acquisition of Sirna Therapeutics, where she was Vice President of Chemistry. Before Sirna, Dr. Vargeese served as Associate Director of Chemistry at NeXstar Pharmaceuticals and is theco-inventor of Macugen (pegaptanib), an approved therapy for treating wet AMD. Dr. Vargeese earned a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India and completed post-doctoral work at the University of Rhode Island.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

In the paragraphs that follow, we have provided an overview and analysis of our compensation program and policies, the material compensation decisions we have made under those programs and policies, and the material factors that we considered in making those decisions. Following this section, you will find a series of tables containing specific information about the compensation earned or paid in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 to the following executive officers, who we will refer to throughout as our “named executive officers” or “NEOs”:

NamePrincipal Position

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA

Keith C. Regnante(1)

Mark Baldry(2)

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

President and Chief Executive Officer

Former Chief Financial Officer

Former Chief Commercial Officer

Chief Medical Officer

Chief Technology Officer

(1)

As of January 9, 2020, Mr. Regnante stepped down from his position as our Chief Financial Officer.

(2)

On August 5, 2019, Mr. Baldry joined us as our Chief Commercial Officer. Following the discontinuation of our then-lead program (suvodirsen) in December 2019, he stepped down from his position in February 2020.

In 2019, we received support from over 87% of our shareholders who cast votes on oursay-on-pay proposal.

Executive Compensation Philosophy

Our Compensation Committee regularly reviews the elements of the individual compensation packages for our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers to achieve the following primary objectives:

Attract, retain and motivate superior executive talent across all areas of our business;

Provide incentives that reward the achievement of performance goals that directly correlate to the enhancement of shareholder value, which we seek to achieve through the discovery, development and potential commercialization of transformative medicines;

Ensure the majority of compensation is performance-based and“at-risk”; and

Align our executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders through long-term incentives linked to specific performance.

We aim for simplicity in our compensation program so that it is easy for our employees and our shareholders to understand the various components of our compensation program and the incentives designed to drive Company performance. The three key components of our executive compensation program are base salary, annual cash performance-based incentives and equity-based long-term incentive awards.

2019 Business Highlights

2019 was a milestone year for Wave, during which we made progress in our mission to discover and develop novel oligonucleotide therapeutics for the potential treatment of genetically defined diseases, while also enduring a disappointing setback. In 2019, years of hard work, collaboration and commitment culminated in several data readouts for our lead programs in Duchene muscular dystrophy (“DMD”) and Huntington’s disease (“HD”). Highlights of our accomplishments and milestones that informed our executive compensation decisions are described below.

Discontinuation of suvodirsen development program in DMD: In April 2019, we reported favorable safety and tolerability data in our Phase 1 trial for our then-lead program suvodirsen for patients with DMD who are amenable to exon 51 skipping and we announced the details of our planned Phase 2/3 trial. With those positive safety data in hand, we spent much of 2019 building out our organization in anticipation of a potential accelerated approval and commercial launch of suvodirsen in the U.S. However, in December 2019, based on our interim analysis of the Phase 1 open-label extension (“OLE”) study, we announced our disappointing decision to discontinue development of suvodirsen. The results of the OLE study showed no change from baseline in dystrophin expression, as measured by western blot. We do not believe that the results of our suvodirsen program have any read-through to our clinical, preclinical or discovery programs in central nervous system (“CNS”), ophthalmology or hepatic diseases.

Clinical trial and regulatory advancements in HD:In HD, we reported interim topline clinical data from our ongoing Phase 1b/2aPRECISION-HD2 trial in December 2019 that demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mutant huntingtin and a favorable safety profile supporting the addition of a higher dose cohort, which we initiated in January 2020. These historic data were the first to support the potential for an allele-selective approach to treating this devastating disease that impacts more than 30,000 people in the United States alone. Throughout 2019, we continued to advance our Phase 1b/2aPRECISION-HD1 trial, which is ongoing and has remained blinded based on the topline results from thePRECISION-HD2 trial. In October 2019, we initiated an open label extension study of thePRECISION-HD2 trial outside of the United States for patients who participated in that trial.

Pipeline, program and platform development: During 2019, we made significant advancements toward clinical development in our third-allele selective HD program, our HTT SNP3 program, and our C9orf72 program for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (“ALS”) and frontotemporal dementia (“FTD”), both of which benefited meaningfully from novel advances in our PRISM platform. We expect to initiate clinical development for both programs in the second half of 2020. In addition to advances in PRISM that we have pulled through to our CNS programs, 2019 was a year of significant advancement for the development of our ADAR-mediatedRNA-editing platform capability. Our 2019 progress in ADAR culminated in our presentation ofproof-of-concept data for ourRNA-editing program in January 2020, which demonstrated endogenous ADAR engagement in vitro. We reported initial in vivo results in May 2020, and we look forward to sharing further updates on this exciting new modality.

Strategic collaborations:In 2019, we continued to leverage our latest learnings from PRISM to design and advance additional stereopure oligonucleotides with optimized profiles for CNS indications, including Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and other diseases as part of our collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

Finance and operations:We ended 2019 with $147.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. In January 2019, we completed an underwritten public offering of our ordinary shares, resulting in gross proceeds to us of approximately $172.6 million. During 2019, we further enhanced our internal cGMP manufacturing capabilities to increase control and visibility of our drug substance supply chain. We continued to strengthen our intellectual property position and in 2019, we filed 10 new patent applications and eight new U.S. patents were issued.

Roles and Responsibilities in the Decision-making Process

Role of the Compensation Committee

Pursuant to its charter, our Compensation Committee creates the policies that govern base salary, annual cash performance-based incentives, our long-term incentive program and other compensation and benefits for our executive officers. Our Compensation Committee also oversees various executive and employee compensation plans and programs and is responsible for monitoring these plans and programs to confirm that they adhere to our compensation philosophy and objectives. Our Compensation Committee determines the appropriate

compensation levels for our executive officers, evaluates officer and director compensation plans, policies and programs, and reviews benefit plans for our executive officers. Our Compensation Committee believes that the total compensation paid to our executive officers should be fair, reasonable and competitive, and that a significant portion of the total compensation should be tied to our Company’s annual and long-term performance. Each year, our Compensation Committee reviews and discusses our executive officers’ proposed compensation with the Chief Executive Officer for all executives other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer’s compensation is determined solely by the Compensation Committee.

Role of Management

Our Compensation Committee works with members of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (except with respect to his own compensation), and our human resources, finance and legal professionals. Typically, our management assists the Compensation Committee by providing information on corporate and individual performance and management’s perspective and recommendations on compensation matters for each executive officer. Our Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding most compensation matters, including executive compensation and our annual and long-term incentive programs. However, the Compensation Committee does not delegate any of its functions to others in setting the compensation of our NEOs.

Role of Compensation Consultant

Our Compensation Committee has the authority to retain the services and obtain the advice of external advisors, including compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors to assist in the evaluation of executive officer compensation. Our Compensation Committee engaged Radford, a business unit of AON plc and an independent executive compensation consulting firm (“Radford”), to review our executive compensation policies and practices and to conduct an executive compensation market analysis.

For 2019, Radford reviewed and advised on all principal aspects of our executive compensation program, including:

Assisting in developing a peer group of publicly traded companies to be used to help assess executive compensation;

Assisting in developing a competitive compensation strategy and consistent executive compensation assessment practices relevant to a public company, including review and recommendation of the annual performance-based cash incentive program as well as the equity strategy for the Company covering dilution, grant levels and type of equity; and

Meeting with the Compensation Committee to review elements of executive compensation including the competitiveness of the executive compensation program.

Our Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Radford consistent with the Nasdaq Stock Market listing requirements and has concluded that the engagement of Radford does not raise any conflicts of interest.

Peer Companies and Use of Market Data

In determining market competitiveness of executive officer compensation, our Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, Radford, evaluates the market competitiveness of compensation for each of our executive officers in order to guide target compensation decisions for the coming year. Our Compensation Committee references a peer group of publicly traded companies in the biopharmaceutical industry for purposes of gathering data to compare with our existing executive compensation levels and practices and as context for future compensation decisions. Our Compensation Committee reviews and

updates the compensation peer group each year, as appropriate, to include companies that the Compensation Committee believes are competitors for executive talent and that are similar to us in terms of their stage of development, therapeutic focus, market capitalization, number of employees, structure, financial profile and geographic proximity to the Cambridge biotech cluster, as applicable. We also recognize that it is unlikely for companies to align equally on all factors, so we consider companies that meet a majority of the criteria. Due to the nature of our business, we compete for executive talent with many companies much larger than we are. Our Compensation Committee considers peer group and other industry compensation data and the recommendations of our compensation consultant when making decisions related to executive compensation, ultimately giving consideration to the competitiveness of our compensation program, internal perceptions of equity and individual performance and role.

In late 2018 we reevaluated our peer group for 2019 and based on the factors described above, Radford determined that four companies no longer met the selection criteria and recommended that they be removed from the historical peer group. Radford further recommended the addition of nine companies better aligned with the selection criteria, with a specific focus on stage of development and talent profile (principally that we compete for talent in a high demand – low availability marketplace against companies that are significantly larger we are). Our Compensation Committee considered Radford’s recommendations and ultimately determined that our peer group for 2019 should consist of the following 24 companies that were selected among publicly traded biopharmaceutical companies:

•  Aduro BioTech, Inc.

•  Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.

•  Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

•  Arbutus Biopharma Corporation

•  Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

•  Audentes Therapeutics, Inc.

•  bluebird bio, Inc.

•  Blueprint Medicines Corp.

•  CRISPR Therapeutics AG

•  CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.

•  Denali Therapeutics Inc.

•  Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

•  Editas Medicine, Inc.

•  Epizyme, Inc.

•  Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

•  Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

•  REGENXBIO, Inc.

•  Sage Therapeutics, Inc.

•  Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc.

•  Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

•  Spark Therapeutics, Inc.

•  Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

•  Voyager Therapeutics, Inc.

•  Xencor, Inc.

Our Compensation Committee finds comparative data from our peer group to be useful in setting and adjusting executive compensation, but it does not target our programs or any particular element of compensation to be at or within a particular percentile or range compared to our peers. Our Compensation Committee uses the peer group data primarily to ensure that our executive compensation program and its constituent elements are and remain competitive in relation to our peers, and applies judgment and discretion in establishing targeted compensation levels taking into account not only competitive market data but also the experience of the executive, scope of responsibility, critical skill sets and expertise.

Components of Executive Compensation

The primary elements of our executive compensation program are:

Base salary;

Annual performance-based cash incentive compensation; and

Long-term equity incentive awards.

We also provide broad-based health and welfare benefits and have certain severance andchange-in-control benefits. Our intention is to structure these components of our executive compensation program in a way that achieves the objectives of the program of linking and emphasizing pay to performance over both the short- and long-term, aligning executives’ interests with the interests of shareholders and attracting, motivating and retaining highly skilled and experienced executives.

Base Salary

Annual base salary is designed to provide a competitive fixed rate of pay, recognizing different levels of responsibility and performance. Actual salaries reflect the judgment and consideration of numerous factors by the Compensation Committee. These factors include the NEO’s experience, importance of position, performance, comparative survey data, internal pay equity, scope of responsibilities, expertise, the criticality of the NEO’s position within the Company, the other elements of compensation received by the NEO, and the NEO’s compensation in comparison to similarly situated executive officers at comparable companies in our peer group. The salary increases for 2019 for all of our NEOs were made to ensure better alignment with market data and in consideration of internal pay equity.

The following were the annual base salaries of our NEOs in effect for 2018 and 2019:

Name

  2018
Base Salary
   2019
Base Salary
   % Increase 

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA

  $541,100   $578,977    7

Keith C. Regnante

  $350,000   $362,250    3.5

Mark Baldry(1)

  $   $425,000    

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

  $430,300   $451,815    5

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

  $400,000   $426,000    6.5

(1)

Mr. Baldry commenced employment with us in August 2019.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that, in order to reward performance and overall Company success, a portion of an executive officer’s compensation should be tied to the achievement of the Company’s goals in the form of an annual cash incentive payment. Our executive officers are eligible to receive annual cash incentive awards, with the target bonus opportunity determined as a percentage of their base salary. We established this program in order to focus and incentivize our executives to achieve short-term strategic business objectives.

For 2019, the target bonus opportunity for each NEO was the same as for 2018, except for Dr. Bolno whose target percentage was increased from 55% to 65% to align his bonus opportunity with similarly situated CEOs.

At the beginning of 2019, our Board approved ambitious corporate goals and objectives that our Compensation Committee then used to design our annual incentive compensation program for 2019. Under this program, the Compensation Committee established corporate goals that would apply uniformly to all of our executive officers. For the reasons set forth under “2019 Business Highlights” above, we believe that 2019 was a year of strong performance and although we were delayed or unable to achieve some of our goals, we achieved or exceeded most of our goals. In addition to our stated goals, we completed afollow-on public offering in January 2019 that yielded $172.6 in gross proceeds thereby substantially extending our cash runway. Our 2019 corporate goals that were assessed to determine our 2019 corporate performance follow:

Deliver clinical data on suvodirsen from the interim analysis of our Phase 1 open-label extension study (achieved)

Initiate Phase 2/3 trial for suvodirsen (achieved)

Prepare and file clinical trial application forWVE-N531 for patients amenable to exon 53 skipping (prepared to file, but did not file due to discontinuation of DMD franchise following suvodirsen data readout)

Deliver clinical data onWVE-120102 from ourPRECISION-HD2 clinical trial (delayed from 1H 2019; achieved in 2H 2019)

Deliver clinical data onWVE-120101 from ourPRECISION-HD1 clinical trial (delayed from 1H 2019;delayed into 2020)

Advance C9orf72 program for ALS and FTD to support initiation of clinical development in 2020 (achieved)

Advance HTT SNP3 program for HD to support initiation of clinical development in 2020 (achieved)

Deliverin vivoproof-of-concept data supporting ophthalmology candidate targeting USH2A (achieved)

Maintain supply of preclinical and clinical material for our ongoing and planned programs (achieved)

Ensure the preparation of a CMC package to support NDA filing for suvodirsen (achieved)

Hire Chief Commercial Officer, build and begin implementing commercialization roadmap (achieved)

Establish commercial readiness plan for suvodirsen (achieved)

Design, develop and deliver next generation of Wave management development training program (achieved)

Maintain regrettable turnover below industry standards (achieved)

Deliver 2019 corporate goals within our 2019 budget (achieved)

Based on our Board’s assessment and consideration of the relative weighting and importance of our goals, our Board determined that we achieved 75% of our 2019 corporate goals. The Compensation Committee then determined that bonuses for 2019 performance be paid to our named executive officers based on these results. In early 2020, our CEO and other NEOs were awarded their incentive payouts in connection with meeting the 2019 corporate goals at 75% of their incentive target amounts. The following table sets forth the cash bonus payments for 2019 performance:

Name

  Incentive Target Amount
(as a % of Base Salary)
  Actual Award 

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA

   65 $282,251 

Keith C. Regnante

   40 $108,675 

Mark Baldry

   40 $52,048 

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

   40 $135,545 

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

   40 $127,800 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

We have a broad-based equity compensation program designed to reward and motivate our employees, including our NEOs. Equity awards help align the interests of our NEOs and other employees with the long-term interests of our shareholders and provide an opportunity for employees to acquire an ownership interest in the Company. The granting of equity awards is also consistent with our compensation philosophy of attracting, retaining and motivating our NEOs to deliver sustainable long-term value and aligning the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. In determining the size and type of equity awards to grant, our Compensation Committee considered evolving market practices, as well as the retentive value provided by our equity grants.

Our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, which we adopted prior to our initial public offering, was amended in August 2017 following shareholder approval of the amendments to our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan at our 2017 Annual General Meeting. The plan allows for the grant of options, restricted share awards, restricted share unit awards (RSUs), other share or cash-based awards and dividend equivalent awards to employees,non-employee directors and consultants.

Since Wave became a public company in November 2015, we have provided annual long-term incentive awards to our executive officers as follows:

2016 LTIP – grants were made 100% in share options vesting over a four-year period with 25% vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant and the remainder vesting monthly over the next three years;

2017 LTIP – grants were made at approximately 67% in share options that vest over a four-year period with 25% vesting on February 15, 2018 and the remainder vesting monthly over the next three years; and approximately 33% in RSUs that vest annually in equal installments of 25% over a four-year period beginning on February 15, 2018;

2018 LTIP – grants were made at approximately 67% in share options that vest over a four-year period with 25% vesting on February 15, 2019 and the remainder vesting quarterly over the next three years; and approximately 33% in RSUs that vest annually in equal installments of 25% over a four-year period beginning on February 15, 2019; and

2019 LTIP – grants were made at approximately 79% in performance-based RSUs and approximately 21% in time-based RSUs that vest annually in equal installments of 25% over a four-year period beginning on February 15, 2020. The performance-based RSUs vest based on two separate performance metrics: 80% of the award will vest upon receipt of the first regulatory approval of a Wave drug product by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or European Medicines Agency; and 20% of the award will vest upon the first commercial sale of a Wave drug product, in each case, occurring by March 7, 2029, subject to continuous service.

In 2017, we changed the type of awards granted to a mix of two types of equity awards to combine the retention and downside risk benefits inherent in RSUs with the stockholder-value-creation benefits inherent in share options, while mitigating the potential risk that may manifest itself through using a single type of award. In 2018, we continued this practice of granting a combination of share options and RSUs.

In 2019, we determined not to grant share options and instead added performance-based RSUs to the mix of grants for all of our employees, including our NEOs, in addition to the continued grant of time-based RSUs. The performance-based RSUs were designed to provide significant “at risk” compensation directly aligned with shareholder value creation, further promote cross-company collaboration around critical company milestones, provide equity incentives consistent with ourpay-for-performance philosophy and retain key talent. All employees, including our NEOs, received a combination of performance-based RSUs with the same performance criteria (described under the 2019 LTIP bullet above) and time-based RSUs. The allocation of the two award types for each employee was adjusted on a sliding scale based on seniority, with executives and more senior employees receiving a higher percentage of performance-based RSUs than time-based RSUs and less senior employees receiving a higher percentage of time-based RSUs than performance-based RSUs. In determining the equity awards to be granted to our named executive officers as part of the 2019 LTIP, our Compensation Committee considered, most importantly, the long-term nature of the performance criteria (up to ten years), among other factors, including the value of the equity awards received by executives in our compensation peer group and our industry and the size of the equity awards as a percentage of our outstanding shares, dilution to existing shareholders and the retention value in the outstanding equity program based on the value of outstanding unvested awards. To promote our performance-based compensation philosophy, individual equity awards were positioned higher or lower within the compensation peer group range based on the individual performance of each named executive officer.

In March 2020, in recognition of our lower share price following the discontinuation of our then-lead program (suvodirsen) in December 2019 and to directly align the interests of our employees with those of our shareholders, we granted time-based share options to all employees, including our NEOs. Drs. Bolno, Panzara and Vargeese received 60,000, 36,000 and 36,000 share options, respectively. These share options were granted by our Compensation Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting on March 3, 2020, at an exercise price of $8.17 per share; and vest over atwo-year term, with 50% vesting on February 1, 2021 and the remainder vesting in 2022. The Compensation Committee chose thistwo-year vesting schedule over our standard four-year vesting schedule as a means of retention and because the performance-based RSUs granted as part of the 2019 LTIP became less likely to vest in the near-term due to the discontinuation of our suvodirsen in December 2019, but the performance criteria remain relevant to incentivize performance albeit over a longer period of time. In addition to Dr. Bolno’s 2020 LTIP grant and in lieu of a cash salary increase for the 2020 calendar year, he opted to receive an additional 3,000 share options with the same vesting schedule and exercise price as the 2020 LTIP awards.

Mr. Baldry joined us in August 2019 as our Chief Commercial Officer with a focus on building our commercial function in preparation for the launch of suvodirsen. In connection with the negotiation of his employment agreement, he received 25,000 share options that vest over four years; 35,000 time-based RSUs that vest over four years; 4,000 time-based RSUs that vest over two years; and 25,000 performance-based RSUs (same performance criteria as those awarded in the 2019 LTIP). Following the discontinuation of suvodirsen in December 2019 and in connection with Mr. Baldry’s separation from Wave in February 2020 as part of our workforce reduction that impacted 22% of our workforce, all of his equity awards were forfeited.

For the details regarding our 2019 equity awards, see the “2019 Fiscal Year Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below.

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

Benefits offered to our named executive officers serve a different purpose than do the other elements of total compensation. In general, they are designed to provide a safety net of protection against the financial catastrophes that can result from illness, disability or death and provide for some benefits upon retirement. Benefits offered to our NEOs are the same as those offered to the general employee population, except for the car service provided to our CEO, which is reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table” below. The Compensation Committee determined it is in the best interest of the Company to provide car service for our CEO in order to promote the efficient use of his work time for the Company and to provide safe transportation given the demands of his role, which often require the participation on conference calls during commuting hours as well as extended work hours.

We maintain a 401(k) plan that is intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In general, all of our employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan. Under the 401(k) plan, employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit, equal to $19,000 in 2019, and to have the amount of such reduction contributed to the 401(k) plan. We currently match 50% of an employee’s 401(k) contributions up to a maximum of 6% of the participant’s compensation. Matching contributions are 100% vested upon completion of one year of service with the Company. In addition, employees who turn age 50 before the end of any calendar year may also defer up to an additional $6,000, and thesecatch-up contributions are eligible for matching contributions. Matching contributions made to each of our named executive officers are included in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Employment Agreements and Severance Benefits

Each of our named executive officers entered into an employment agreement or offer letter with the Company in connection with the commencement of his or her employment. All employment agreements and

offer letters generally provide forat-will employment and that our named executive officers are eligible to participate in employee benefit plans of general applicability to other employees, which we maintain from time to time.

On May 8, 2020, the Company entered into amended and restated employment agreements with Drs. Bolno and Vargeese. The employment agreements amend and restate the prior employment arrangements between the Company and Drs. Bolno and Vargeese. Under the terms of the employment agreements, the 2020 annual base salaries for Drs. Bolno and Vargeese are $578,977 and $434,520, respectively, and their annual target bonus percentages are 65% and 40% of their base salary, respectively. The terms of the employment agreements provide that, if Drs. Bolno or Vargeese is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause or if Drs. Bolno or Vargeese terminates his or her employment for good reason, Drs. Bolno or Vargeese will be entitled to receive continued payment of his or her base salary for 18 months or 12 months, respectively, following termination; continued payment of health insurance premiums at the Company’s then normal rate of contribution until the earlier of 18 months or 12 months, respectively, following termination or until he or she commences new employment; and the payment of a separation bonus equal to his or her then annual target bonus opportunity, prorated through the termination date. In addition, if a change of control occurs and within one year following the change of control, Drs. Bolno or Vargeese is involuntarily terminated without cause or if Drs. Bolno or Vargeese terminates his or her employment for good reason, Drs. Bolno or Vargeese will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to 18 months or 12 months, respectively, of his or her then-current annual base salary; continued payment of health insurance premiums at the Company’s then normal rate of contribution until the earlier of 18 months or 12 months, respectively, following termination or until he or she commences new employment; and the payment of a separation bonus equal to his or her then annual target bonus opportunity.

Each of Dr. Panzara, Mr. Regnante and Mr. Baldry entered into an employment agreement with the Company that provides if he is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to receive continued payment of his base salary for 12 months following termination, and continued payment of health insurance premiums at the Company’s then normal rate of contribution until the earlier of 12 months following termination or until he commences new employment. In addition, if a change of control occurs and within one year following the change of control, Dr. Panzara, Mr. Regnante or Mr. Baldry is involuntarily terminated without cause or terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to 12 months of his then-current annual base salary; continued payment of health insurance premiums at the Company’s then normal rate of contribution until the earlier of 12 months following the termination date or until he commences new employment; and the payment of a separation bonus equal to his then annual target bonus opportunity, prorated through his termination date.

In January and February 2020, in connection with the separation of Messrs. Regnante and Baldry from the Company, respectively, each received the severance benefits to which he was entitled under his employment agreement.

In addition, as a condition of their employment, each of our named executive officers has entered into anon-competition andnon-solicitation agreement pursuant to which he or she has agreed not to compete with us nor hire our employees for a period of 12 months following the termination of his or her employment.

The equity agreements with each of Drs. Bolno, Panzara, and Vargeese and Mr. Regnante that were entered into on or before December 31, 2017 provide that all unvested shares underlying outstanding options and restricted share units will become fully vested upon a change of control. The Compensation Committee determined that commencing in 2018 future equity agreements with our NEOs would provide for “double trigger” vesting upon a change of control meaning that all unvested shares underlying outstanding options and restricted share units granted after December 31, 2017 will become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. We have not provided any excise taxgross-ups to any of our NEOs in the event of a change of control.

Risk Analysis of Our Compensation Plans

Our Compensation Committee reviews the risks and rewards associated with our compensation programs. The programs are designed with features that mitigate risk without diminishing the incentive nature of the compensation. We believe our compensation programs encourage and reward prudent business judgment and appropriate risk-taking over the short term and the long term. Our Compensation Committee regularly evaluates the risks involved with our compensation programs and does not believe that any of our compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us now or in the future.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K, which appears elsewhere in this proxy statement, with our management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our proxy statement.

Members of the Wave Life Sciences Ltd. Compensation Committee:

Christian Henry (Chairman)

Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D.

Amy Pott

Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows the total compensation paid or accrued during the last twothree fiscal years ended December 31, 20172019, 2018 and 20162017 to our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our twothree next most highly compensated executive officers who earned more than $100,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 and were serving as executive officers as of such date.

 

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Share
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
  Total ($) 

Paul B. Bolno, M.D.

  2017   515,300   —     1,054,515   1,342,902   283,400   528   3,196,645 

President and Chief
Executive Officer

  2016   490,000   329,000   —     2,505,377   245,000   25,486   3,594,863 

Christopher Francis, Ph.D.

  2017   330,000   —     284,690   361,194   127,100   528   1,103,512 

Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, Head of Emerging Areas

        

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

  2017   350,000   —     284,690   361,194   154,000   7,380   1,157,264 

Senior Vice President, Drug Discovery

        

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Share
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
  Total ($) 

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA

  2019   578,977   —     2,700,000      282,251   20,298   3,581,526 

President and Chief Executive Officer

  2018   541,100   —     2,182,725   2,802,601   303,557   9,983   5,839,966 
  2017   515,300   —     1,054,515   1,342,902   283,400   528   3,196,645 

Keith C. Regnante

  2019   362,250   —     607,500      108,675   9,642   1,088,067 

Former Chief Financial Officer

  2018   350,000   —     520,650   668,510   142,800   9,060   1,691,020 
  2017   327,400   —     124,915   159,296   144,100   6,136   761,847 

Mark Baldry

  2019   173,493   80,000   759,720   311,610   52,048   177,956   1,554,827 

Former Chief Commercial Officer

        

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

  2019   451,815   —     675,000      135,545   9,642   1,272,002 

Chief Medical Officer

  2018   430,300   —     700,875   899,918   175,562   9,492   2,216,147 
  2017   417,800   —     200,445   255,614   183,800   9,342   1,067,001 

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

  2019   426,000   —     675,000      127,800   10,722   1,239,522 

Chief Technology Officer

  2018   400,000   —     700,875   899,918   163,200   10,572   2,174,565 
  2017   350,000   —     284,690   361,194   154,000   7,380   1,157,264 

 

(1)

Amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value for the share awards identified, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For performance-based RSUs, the value reported includes the value

of the award at the grant date based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. The value of the performance-based RSUs at the grant date, assuming that all performance conditions will be achieved, is $8,325,000 for Dr. Bolno, $1,800,000 for Mr. Regnante, $487,000 for Mr. Baldry, $4,500,000 for Dr. Panzara and $4,500,000 for Dr. Vargeese. A discussion of the assumptions used in determining grant date fair value may be found in Note 7 to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

 

(2)

Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value for the option awards identified, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. A discussion of the assumptions used in determining grant date fair value may be found in Note 7 to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

 

(3)Amounts

For 2019, amounts include 401(k) matching contributions of $8,400 made to Dr.Mr. Regnante and Drs. Panzara and Vargeese and $1,331 made to Mr. Baldry, as well as the value of annual premiums paid by us with respect to a life insurance policy for the benefit of each of the named executive officers. For 2016,2019, amounts for Dr. Bolno also include reimbursement of relocationcommuting expenses of $15,461$14,795 and the related tax gross up of $8,500$4,693. For 2019, amounts for Mr. Baldry also include reimbursement of relocation expenses as well as certain commuting expenses.set forth in his employment agreement in connection with his move to Massachusetts of $100,000 and the related tax gross up of $75,732.

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table2019 Fiscal Year Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Our Compensation Committee reviews and discusses our executive officers’ proposed compensation with the Chief Executive Officer for all executives other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer’s compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee.

Employment Agreements

Paul B. Bolno, M.D. Effective asfollowing table shows information regarding grants of January 1, 2016, Dr. Bolno’s annual base salary was increased to $490,000 and his annual target bonus percentage for his 2016 bonus was increased to 50%. Effective as of January 1, 2017, Dr. Bolno’s annual base salary was increased to $515,300, and effective as of January 1, 2018, his annual base salary was increased to $541,100. In January 2018, in recognition of his 2017 performance supporting the achievement of our corporate goals discussed below, Dr. Bolno received a cash bonus of $283,400 that was equal to 110% of his target bonus of 50%. He also received an option to purchase 109,000 of our ordinary shares and 54,500 restricted share units under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan as long-termnon-equity incentive plan awards. In addition, effective asawards and grants of January 1, 2018, Dr. Bolno’s annual target bonus percentage was increasedequity awards that we made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 to 55%.

Christopher Francis, Ph.D.In March 2014, we entered into an offer letter with Dr. Francis pursuant to which he served as our Vice President, Head of Business Development, and now serves as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, Head of Emerging Areas. Effective as of January 1, 2017, Dr. Francis’s annual base salary was increased to $330,000, and effective as of January 1, 2018, his annual base salary was increased to $363,000. In January 2018, in recognition of his 2017 performance supporting the achievement of our corporate goals discussed below, Dr. Francis received a cash bonus of $127,100 that was equal to 110% of his annual target bonus percentage of 35%. In addition, he received an option to purchase 26,000 of our ordinary shares and 13,000 restricted share units under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan as long-term incentive plan awards.

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.In July 2014, we entered into an offer letter with Dr. Vargeese pursuant to which she served as our Senior Vice President, Drug Discovery. Effective as of January 1, 2017, Dr. Vargeese’s annual base salary was increased to $350,000, and effective as of January 1, 2018, her annual base salary was increased to $400,000. In January 2018, in recognition of her 2017 performance supporting the achievement of our corporate goals discussed below, Dr. Vargeese received a cash bonus of $154,000 that was equal to 110% of her annual target bonus percentage of 40%. In addition, she received an option to purchase 35,000 of our ordinary shares and 17,500 restricted share units under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan as long-term incentive plan awards.

Our named executive officers are also entitled to certain benefits in connection with a termination of employment or a change of control, which are discussed below under “—Potential Payments upon Termination orChange-In-Control.”

In addition, as a condition of their employment, each of our named executive officers has entered into anon-competition andnon-solicitation agreement pursuant to which he or she has agreed not to compete with us for a period of 12 months followingnamed in the termination of his or her employment. All agreements generally provide forat-will employment and that our named executive officers are eligible to participate in employee benefit plans of general applicability to other senior executives, which we maintain from time to time.Summary Compensation Table.

2017Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

Name

 Grant
Date
  Estimated
Future Payouts
Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Target ($)(1)
  Estimated
Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Target (#)
  All Other Share
Awards: Number
of Shares or
Units (#)
  All Other Option
Awards: Number
of Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
  Exercise or
Base Price of
Option Awards
($/Share)(6)
  Grant Date Fair
Value of Share
and Option
Awards($)(7)
 

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA

  —     376,335   —     —     —     —     —   
  3/7/2019   —     185,000(2)   —     —     —     —   
  3/7/2019   —     —     60,000(3)   —     —     2,700,000 

Keith C. Regnante

  —     144,900   —     —     —     —     —   
  3/7/2019   —     40,000(2)   —     —     —     —   
  3/7/2019   —     —     13,500(3)   —     —     607,500 

Mark Baldry

  —     170,000   —     —     —     —     —   
  8/5/2019   —     25,000(2)   —     —     —     —   
  8/5/2019   —     —     39,000(4)   —     —     759,720 
  8/5/2019   —     —     —     25,000(5)  $19.48   311,610 

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

  —     184,344   —     —     —     —     —   
  3/7/2019   —     100,000(2)   —     —     —     —   
  3/7/2019   —     —     15,000(3)   —     —     675,000 

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

  —     173,808   —     —     —     —     —   
  3/7/2019   —     100,000(2)   —     —     —     —   
  3/7/2019   —     —     15,000(3)   —     —     675,000 

(1)

Represents the potential 2019 cash incentive bonus payouts assuming target achievement of corporate goals, based upon the named executive officer’s cash incentive bonus target and base salary in effect on December 31, 2019. No minimum threshold amount or maximum amount beyond the target amount was established. See the column entitled“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table for the cash

Each of our named executive officers is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus calculated based on a target percentage of base salary, subject to the achievement of annual performance goals as determined by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion. Performance goals considered by our Board of Directors to determine bonuses for 2017 included advancing our pipeline by initiating three clinical programs in neurology and identifying clinical candidates outside of neurology; investing in platform technologies to enhance our discovery engine; and establishing internal cGMP manufacturing capabilities to meet our clinical deliverables. In recognition of these achievements, each of our named executive officers received their annual bonuses at 110% of their target bonus percentage.

incentive bonuses earned by the named executive officers in 2019. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Components of Executive Compensation —Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation”for a description of the target amount applicable to each named executive officer.

(2)

Represents grants of performance-based RSUs made to the named executive officers in 2019. Such awards vest based on two separate performance metrics, 80% of the target award amount will vest upon receipt of the first regulatory approval of a Wave drug product by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or European Medicines Agency and 20% of the target award will vest upon the first commercial sale of a Wave drug product, in each case, occurring on or before March 7, 2029. All unvested performance-based RSUs for Mr. Regnante and Mr. Baldry were forfeited on the date they stepped down from their positions on January 9, 2020 and February 21, 2020, respectively.

(3)

Represents grants of restricted share units made to the named executive officers in 2019. Such awards vest annually in equal installments over a four-year period beginning on February 15, 2019, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. 10,125 of the RSUs granted to Mr. Regnante on March 7, 2019 were forfeited when Mr. Regnante stepped down from his position on January 9, 2020.

(4)

Represents grants of restricted share units made to Mr. Baldry in 2019. 35,000 and 4,000 of these awards vest annually in equal installments over a four-year andtwo-year period, respectively, beginning on August 5, 2019, subject to Mr. Baldry’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. These RSUs were forfeited when Mr. Baldry stepped down from his position on February 21, 2020.

(5)

Represents the grant of share options made to Mr. Baldry in 2019. Such awards have a four-year vesting period, with 25% of the shares subject to the award vesting on the first anniversary of August 5, 2019 and the remainder vesting quarterly in equal installments over the following 12 quarters, subject to Mr. Baldry’s continued service with us on each vesting date. These share options were forfeited when Mr. Baldry stepped down from his position on February 21, 2020.

(6)

Represents the closing market price of the shares on the grant date.

(7)

Amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value for the options and restricted share unit awards, as applicable, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. A discussion of the assumptions used in determining grant date fair value may be found in Note 7 to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

2014 Equity Incentive Plan

Our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan was amended on August 10, 2017, (the “2014 Equity Incentive Plan”), following receipt of shareholder approval at our 2017 Annual General Meeting. Accordingly, based on approval at our 2017 Annual General Meeting, our Board of Directors and shareholders have authorized 6,064,544 ordinary shares for the granting of incentive options,non-qualified options, or NQSOs,“NQSOs,” share appreciation rights and restricted share unit awards, plus annual increases on the first day of July 2018, 2019 and 2020 equal to the lesser of (A) 3% of the ordinary shares outstanding on the day prior to the increase; and (B) such lesser number of ordinary shares as determined by the Board; provided that no more than 10,000,000 ordinary shares may be issued upon the exercise of incentive share options. On July 1, 2018 and 2019, the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan was increased by 878,800 and 1,027,987 ordinary shares, respectively. The maximum number of ordinary shares with respect to awards which may be granted to any participant in any fiscal year under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan is 600,000 shares. In the event of a share dividend, split, recapitalization or reorganization or other change in capital structure, our Board of Directors will make appropriate adjustments to these amounts.

Any shares subject to an award that is canceled, forfeited or expires prior to exercise or realization, either in full or in part, will again become available for issuance under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. However, shares subject to an award under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan will not again be made available for issuance or delivery under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan if such shares are (a) shares tendered in payment of an option; (b) shares delivered or withheld by us to satisfy any tax withholding obligation; or (c) shares covered by a share-settled share appreciation right or other awards that were not issued upon the settlement of the award.

If we are acquired, our Board of Directors (or Compensation Committee) will with respect to options and share appreciation rights: (i) make appropriate provision for the continuation of the option or share appreciation right by substituting on an equitable basis for the ordinary shares then subject to such option or share appreciation right either the consideration payable with respect to the outstanding ordinary shares in connection with the corporate transaction or securities of any successor or acquiring entity; (ii) cancel or arrange for the cancellation of the options or share appreciation rights, to the extent not vested or exercised prior to the effective time of the transaction, in exchange for a payment in cash or ordinary shares as determined by the Board, of Directors, in an amount equal to the amount by which the then-fair market value of the ordinary shares subject to such vested option or share appreciation right exceeds the exercise price; or (iii) after giving holders an opportunity to exercise to the extent vested their outstanding options or share appreciation rights, terminate any or all unexercised options and share appreciation rights at such time as the Board of Directors deems appropriate. If we are acquired, our Board of Directors (or Compensation Committee) will with respect to outstanding restricted awards make appropriate provision for the continuation of such restricted awards on the same terms and conditions by substituting on an equitable basis for the ordinary shares then subject to such restricted awards either the consideration payable with respect to the outstanding ordinary shares in connection with the transaction or securities of any successor or acquiring entity. In lieu of the foregoing, if we are acquired, the Board of Directors may provide that, upon consummation of the acquisition, each outstanding restricted award shall be terminated in exchange for payment of an amount equal to the consideration payable upon consummation of such transaction to a holder of the number of ordinary shares comprising such restricted award to the extent then vested.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172019 FiscalYear-End

The following table shows grants of options and grants of unvested restricted share unit awards outstanding on the last day of the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 to each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

 Option Awards Share Awards  Option Awards Share Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price ($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or Share
Units That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Market Value of
Shares or Share
Units That Have
Not Vested ($)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)

Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)

Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price ($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Share Units
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
 Market Value
of Shares or

Share Units
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:

Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units
or Other

Rights
That
Have

Not Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive

Plan
Awards:

Market or
Payout
Value of

Unearned
Shares,

Units
or Other

Rights
That

Have Not
Vested ($)
 

Paul B. Bolno, M.D.

 544,025   —    $2.48  3/10/2025   

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA

 444,025   —    $2.48  3/10/2025     
 88,650   147,750(1)  $18.79  6/16/2026    206,850  29,550(1)  $18.79  6/16/2026     
  —     72,500(2)  $29.05  1/25/2027    51,353  21,147(2)  $29.05  1/25/2027     
      36,300(3)  $1,274,130  47,687  61,313(3)  $40.05  1/23/2028     

Christopher Francis, Ph.D.

 134,726   12,250(4)  $2.48  3/10/2025   
     18,150(4)  $145,472   
     40,875(5)  $327,613   
     60,000(6)  $480,900   
       185,000(7)  $1,482,775 

Keith C. Regnante

 70,500  20,000(8)  $20.89  8/16/2026     
 6,091  2,509(2)  $29.05  1/25/2027     
 11,375  14,625(3)  $40.05  1/23/2028     
     2,150(4)  $17,232   
     9,750(5)  $78,146   
     13,000(6)  $108,203   
       40,000(7)  $320,600 

Mark Baldry

  —    25,000(9)  $19.48  8/5/2029     
     35,000(10)  $280,525   
     4,000(11)  $32,060   
       25,000(7)  $200,375 

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

 109,375  21,875(12)  $21.69  7/11/2026     
 9,774  4,026(2)  $29.05  1/25/2027     
 15,312  19,688(3)  $40.05  1/23/2028     
     3,450(4)  $27,652   
 13,913   23,187(1)  $18.79  6/16/2026        13,125(5)  $105,197   
  —     19,500(2)  $29.05  1/25/2027        15,000(6)  $120,225   
      9,800(3)  $343,980        100,000(7)  $801,500 

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

 182,220   36,744(5)  $2.48  3/10/2025    205,964   —    $2.48  3/10/2025     
 18,598   31,002(1)  $18.79  6/16/2026    43,390  6,210(1)  $18.79  6/16/2026     
  —     19,500(2)  $29.05  1/25/2027    13,812  5,688(2)  $29.05  1/25/2027     
      9,800(3)  $343,980  15,312  19,688(3)  $40.05  1/23/2028     
     4,900(4)  $39,274   
     13,125(5)  $105,197   
     15,000(6)  $120,225   
       100,000(7)  $801,500 

 

(1)Vests

25% vested on June 16, 2017 and the remainder vests in equal monthly installments over 36 months, commencing on June 16, 2017, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The option shall become fully vested upon a change of control.

(2)25% vests on February 15, 2018 and the remainder of the option vests in equal monthly installments overfollowing 36 months, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The option shall become fully vested upon a change of control.

(2)

25% vested on February 15, 2018 and the reminder vests in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The option shall become fully vested upon a change of control. All unvested share options held by Mr. Regnante were forfeited when Mr. Regnante stepped down from his position on January 9, 2020.

 

(3)

25% vested on February 15, 2019 and the remainder vests in equal quarterly installments over the following 12 quarters, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The award shall become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. All unvested share options held by Mr. Regnante were forfeited when Mr. Regnante stepped down from his position on January 9, 2020.

(4)

25% vested on February 15, 2018 and the remainder of the award vests in equal annual installments over 3the following three years, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The award shall become fully vested upon a change of control. 1,075 of the RSUs held by Mr. Regnante as of December 31, 2019 were forfeited when Mr. Regnante stepped down from his position on January 9, 2020.

 

(4)(5)Vests

25% vested on February 15, 2019 and the remainder vests in equal annual installments over the following three years, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The award shall become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. 6,500 of the RSUs held by Mr. Regnante as of December 31, 2019 were forfeited when Mr. Regnante stepped down from his position on January 9, 2020.

(6)

25% vested on February 15, 2020 and the remainder vests in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months, commencingsubject to such officer’s continued service with us on April 15, 2015,each such vesting date. The award shall become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. 10,125 of the RSUs held by Mr. Regnante as of December 31, 2019 were forfeited when Mr. Regnante stepped down from his position on January 9, 2020.

(7)

The performance-based RSUs vest based on two separate performance metrics, 80% of the award will vest upon receipt of the first regulatory approval of a Wave drug product by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or European Medicines Agency and 20% of the award will vest upon the first commercial sale of a Wave drug product, in each case, occurring within 10 years of the grant date (March 7, 2029). The award shall become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. All unvested performance-based RSUs for Mr. Regnante and Mr. Baldry were forfeited on the date they stepped down from their positions on January 9, 2020 and February 21, 2020, respectively.

(8)

25% vested on August 16, 2017 and the remainder vests in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The option shall become fully vested upon a change of control. All unvested share options held by Mr. Regnante were forfeited when Mr. Regnante stepped down from his position on January 9, 2020.

 

(5)(9)Vests

25% vests on August 5, 2020 and the remainder vests in equal quarterly installments over the following 12 quarters, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The option shall become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. All unvested share options held by Mr. Baldry were forfeited when Mr. Baldry stepped down from his position on February 21, 2020.

(10)

25% vests on August 5, 2020 and the remainder vests in equal annual installments over the following three years, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The award shall become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. All unvested RSUs held by Mr. Baldry were forfeited when Mr. Baldry stepped down from his position on February 21, 2020.

(11)

50% vests on August 5, 2020 and the remainder vests on August 5, 2021, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The award shall become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. All unvested RSUs held by Mr. Baldry were forfeited when Mr. Baldry stepped down from his position on February 21, 2020.

(12)

25% vested on July 11, 2017 and the remainder vests in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months, commencing on August 1, 2015, subject to such officer’s continued service with us on each such vesting date. The option shall become fully vested upon a change of control.

401(k) PlanOption Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table shows information regarding exercises of options to purchase our shares and vesting of restricted share unit awards held by each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

   Option Awards   Share Awards 

Name

  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise (#)
   Value Realized on
Exercise ($)(1)
   Number of
Shares Acquired on
Vesting (#)
   Value Realized on
Vesting ($)(2)
 

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA.

   50,000    2,149,864    22,700    853,520 

Keith C. Regnante.

   —      —      4,325    162,620 

Mark Baldry.

   —      —      —      —   

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

   —      —      6,100    229,360 

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

   6,000    194,996    6,825    256,620 

(1)

The value realized on the exercise of options was calculated by multiplying the number of options exercised on the applicable exercise date by the difference between the sale price of the shares and the exercise price of the options.

(2)

The value realized on the vesting of restricted share units was calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting on the applicable vesting date by the closing market price of the shares on such date.

Pension Benefits

We maintain a 401(k) plan that is intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Service Code of 1986, as amended. In general, all of our employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in the 401(k)do not have any qualified ornon-qualified defined benefit plans.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not have any nonqualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation plan. Under the 401(k) plan, employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit, equal to $18,000 in 2017, and to have the amount of such reduction contributed to the 401(k) plan. We currently match 50% of an employee’s 401(k) contributions up to a maximum of 6% of the participant’s compensation. Matching contributions are 100% vested upon completion of one year of service with the Company. Matching contributions made to each of our named executive officers are included in the “Summary Compensation Table” above.

Potential Payments upon Termination orChange-In-Control

Pursuant to the employment agreements entered into with Drs. Bolno and Vargeese on May 8, 2020, if we terminate his or her employment without cause or if he or she terminates employment for good reason, Drs. Bolno and/or Vargeese will be entitled to receive as of the date of his or her termination continued payment for 18 months or 12 months, respectively, of his or her then-current annual base salary; continued payment of health insurance premiums at the Company’s then normal rate of contribution until the earlier of 18 months or 12 months, respectively, following termination or until he or she commences new employment; and the payment of a separation bonus equal to his or her then annual target bonus opportunity, prorated through the termination date. In addition, if a change of control occurs and within one year following the change of control, Drs. Bolno or Vargeese is involuntarily terminated without cause or if Drs. Bolno or Vargeese terminates his or her employment for good reason, Drs. Bolno and/or Vargeese will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to 18 months or 12 months, respectively, of his or her then-current annual base salary; continued payment of health insurance premiums at the Company’s then normal rate of contribution until the earlier of 18 months or 12 months, respectively,

following termination or until he or she commences new employment; and the payment of a separation bonus equal to his or her then annual target bonus opportunity. Receipt of the severance and change of control benefits described above are subject to execution of a release of claims against the Company and compliance with certain restrictive covenants following the termination of his or her employment. “Cause” under the employment agreements of Drs. Bolno and Vargeese is defined as: (i) the executive’s willful engagement in dishonesty, illegal conduct or gross misconduct, which is, in each case, materially injurious to the Company or any affiliate; (ii) the executive’s significant insubordination; (iii) the executive’s substantial malfeasance or nonfeasance of duty; (iv) the executive’s repeated failure, inability or refusal to perform his or her duties under such executive’s employment agreement in a manner that is materially injurious to the Company or any affiliate (other than by reason of the executive’s disability); (v) the executive’s unauthorized disclosure of confidential information; (vi) the executive’s embezzlement, misappropriation or fraud, whether or not related to the executive’s employment with the Company; or (vii) the executive’s breach of a material provision of any employment,non-disclosure, invention assignment,non-competition, or similar agreement between the executive and the Company. “Good reason” under the employment agreements of Drs. Bolno and Vargeese is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events without the executive’s written consent: (i) relocation of the executive’s principal business location to a location more than 50 miles from the executive’s then-current business location; (ii) a material diminution in the executive’s duties, authority or responsibilities; (iii) a material reduction in the executive’s base salary (other than as a result of a broad based reduction of salary similarly affecting other Company executives having comparable rank, authority and seniority); or (iv) any material breach of his or her employment agreement by the Company.

Pursuant to an employment agreement entered into with Dr. Panzara in connection with his initial employment in July 2016, with Mr. Regnante in connection with his initial employment in August 2016, and with Mr. Baldry in connection with his initial employment in August 2019, if Dr. Panzara, Mr. Regnante or Mr. Baldry is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause or terminates employment for good reason, he will be entitled to receive continued payment of his base salary for 12 months following termination and continued payment of health insurance premiums at the Company’s then normal rate of contribution until the earlier of 12 months following termination or until he commences new employment. In addition, if a change of control occurs and within one year following the change of control, Dr. Panzara, Mr. Regnante or Mr. Baldry is involuntarily terminated without cause or terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to 12 months of his then-current annual base salary; the payment of a separation bonus equal to his then annual target bonus opportunity, prorated through his termination date; and continued payment of health insurance premiums at the Company’s then normal rate of contribution until the earlier of 12 months following the termination date or until he commences new employment. Receipt of the severance and change of control benefits described above are subject to execution of a release of claims against the Company and compliance with certain restrictive covenants following the termination of his employment. “Cause” under the employment agreements of Dr. Panzara, Mr. Regnante and Mr. Baldry shall include: (i) willful engagement in dishonesty, illegal conduct or gross misconduct, which is, in each case, materially injurious to the Company or any affiliate; (ii) significant insubordination; (iii) substantial malfeasance or nonfeasance of duty; (iv) unauthorized disclosure of confidential information; (v) embezzlement, misappropriation or fraud, whether or not related to employment with the Company; or (vi) breach of a material provision of any employment,non-disclosure, invention assignment,non-competition, or similar agreement with the Company. “Good Reason” under the employment agreements of Dr. Panzara, Mr. Regnante and Mr. Baldry means: (i) relocation of his principal business location to a location more than 50 miles from such location; (ii) a material diminution in the executive’s duties, authority or responsibilities; or (iii) a material reduction in his base salary (other than as a result of a broad based reduction of salary similarly affecting other Company executives having comparable rank, authority and seniority). In January and February 2020, in connection with the separation of Messrs. Regnante and Baldry from the Company, respectively, each received the severance benefits to which he was entitled under his employment agreement.

Pursuant to applicable equity agreements with each of Drs. Bolno, FrancisPanzara and Vargeese and Mr. Regnante, all unvested shares underlying outstanding options and restricted share units that were granted through December 31, 2017 will become fully vested upon a change of control which is defined as follows: (A) a merger or consolidation

of the Company whether or not approved by the Board, of Directors, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or the parent of such corporation) more than 50% of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or parent of such corporation, as the case may be, outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (B) the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets in a transaction requiring shareholder approval.

Pursuant to applicable equity agreements with each of Drs. Bolno, FrancisPanzara and Vargeese and Messrs. Regnante and Baldry, all unvested shares underlying outstanding options and restricted share units that are granted after December 31, 2017 will become fully vested upon termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months following a change of control, as defined above.

In addition, if we terminate Dr. Bolno’s employment without cause, then he will beThe following table sets forth estimates of the payments and benefits each named executive officer would have been entitled to receive from the Company upon a termination of employment under the circumstances described in the table effective December 31, 2019. In accordance with SEC rules, the potential payments were determined under the terms of the Company’s contracts, agreements, plans and arrangements as in effect on December 31, 2019. The tables do not include any previously vested equity awards or accrued benefits. Because the payments to be made to a named executive officer depend on several factors, the actual amounts to be paid out upon a triggering event can only be determined at the time of the triggering event.

Name

 

Compensation Component

 Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
($)
  Voluntary for
Good Reason
Termination
($)
  Acceleration
of Vesting
Upon a
Change of
Control ($)
  Termination
Without Cause or
For Good Reason
Within 12 Months
Following a Change
of Control ($)
 

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA.

 Base salary  578,977(2)   —     —     578,977(2) 
 Non-equity incentive compensation  —     —     —     —   
 Acceleration of unvested options and RSUs(1)  —     —     2,603,151   2,291,288 
 Benefits and Perquisites  —     —     —     —   

Keith C. Regnante

 Base salary  362,250(2)   362,250(2)   —     362,250(2) 
 Non-equity incentive compensation  —     —     —     144,900(3) 
 Acceleration of unvested options and RSUs(1)  —     —     145,472   506,949 
 Benefits and Perquisites  22,268(4)   22,268(4)   —     22,268(4) 

Mark Baldry

 Base salary  425,000(2)   425,000(2)   —     425,000(2) 
 Non-equity incentive compensation  —     —     —     170,000(3) 
 Acceleration of unvested options and RSUs(1)  —     —     —     512,960 
 Benefits and Perquisites  11,842(4)   11,842(4)   —     11,842(4) 

Michael Panzara, M.D., MPH

 Base salary  451,815(2)   451,815(2)   —     451,815(2) 
 Non-equity incentive compensation  —     —     —     180,726(3) 
 Acceleration of unvested options and RSUs(1)  —     —     27,652   1,026,922 
 Benefits and Perquisites  205(4)   205(4)   —     205(4) 

Chandra Vargeese, Ph.D.

 Base salary  —     —     —     —   
 Non-equity incentive compensation  —     —     —     —   
 Acceleration of unvested options and RSUs(1)  —     —     1,179,284   1,026,922 
 Benefits and Perquisites  —     —     —     —   

(1)

Value attributable to accelerated vesting of (i) then unvested options, determined by multiplying the number of shares accelerated by the difference between the exercise price of the option and the closing price of our shares on December 31, 2019, and (ii) then unvested RSUs, determined by multiplying the number of RSUs accelerated by the closing price of our shares on December 31, 2019.

(2)

Twelve months of 2019 base salary continuation.

(3)

Targetnon-equity incentive compensation for 2019.

(4)

Payment of COBRA premiums for twelve months based on executive’s current benefits elections.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are required to disclose the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (excluding our principal executive officer), the annual total compensation of our principal executive officer, who is Dr. Bolno, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and the ratio of these two amounts. The overall structure of our compensation and benefits programs are broadly similar across our organization, including a broad-based equity program pursuant to which all full-time employees receive equity, with differences reflecting the level of responsibility of the employees. In 2019, the ratio of our CEO’s total compensation to our median employee’s total compensation was 20 to 1. For 2019, Dr. Bolno’s total compensation was calculated to be $3,581,526 and the total annual compensation for Wave’s median employee was calculated to be $175,254.

Overview of Methodology and Assumptions

For the purposes of determining the median employee, we included all Wave employees on December 31, 2019 located in the U.S., which represented 97% of our employees globally (293 of our 301 global employees). We excluded our eight employees located outside the U.S. (five employees in England and three employees in Japan) as of December 31, 2019 under the dateSEC’sde minimis exception. Our measure of termination continued payment of hiscompensation to identify the median employee was consistently applied, aggregated for each applicable employee and included 2019 base salary or base rate of pay (annualized in the case of employees who were not employed for 12 months. Drs. Francisthe full fiscal year), target annual cash incentive award and Vargeese dogrant date fair value of any equity awards granted during 2019 to reasonably reflect the annual compensation of our employees. This resulted in the identification of two employees whose 2019 compensation was anomalous (each employee was hired in 2019). Therefore, we exercised discretion permitted by SEC rules to select an alternate median employee, whose compensation was viewed to be more representative of employees at or near the median. The selected employee was immediately above the median in rank order based on the selected consistently applied compensation measure described above.

We believe that our CEO pay ratio for 2019 is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our internal records and the methodology described above. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices, the CEO pay ratio reported by other companies for 2019 may not be comparable to our CEO pay ratio for 2019. Furthermore, other companies have any severance arrangements with the Company.different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

Director Compensation

The following table shows the total compensation paid or accrued during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 to each of ournon-employee directors. Directors who are also employees are not compensated for their service on our Board of Directors.Board.

 

Name

  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash  ($)(1)
   Option Awards ($)(2)   All Other
Compensation ($)
 Total ($)   Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($) (1)
   Option Awards ($) (2)   All Other
Compensation ($)
 Total ($) 

Christian Henry

   63,431    78,241    141,672    104,989    101,121    —    206,110 

Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D.

   15,178    243,915    —    259,093 

Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D.

   49,000    78,241    —    127,241    50,477    101,121    —    151,598 

Koji Miura

   42,500    78,241    —    120,741    49,755    101,121    —    150,876 

Amy Pott

   14,637    243,915    —    258,552 

Adrian Rawcliffe

   38,745    408,167    —    446,912    49,755    101,121    —    150,876 

Ken Takanashi

   48,000    78,241    —    126,241    50,207    101,121    —    151,328 

Masaharu Tanaka

   22,069    —      —    22,069 

Gregory Verdine, Ph.D.

   53,886    78,241    150,000(3)  282,127 

Takeshi Wada, Ph.D.

   2,973    —      26,290(4)  29,263 

Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D.

   42,039    101,121    150,000(3)  293,160 

Heidi L. Wagner, J.D.

   14,366    243,915    —    258,281 

 

(1)

Amounts represent fees earned during 20172019 under ourNon-Employee Director Compensation Policy. Dr. Corrigan, Ms. Pott and Ms. Wagner were appointed as directors of the Company on September 4, 2019.

 

(2)

Amount represents the aggregate grant date fair value for the option awards identified, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Dr. Corrigan, Ms. Pott and Ms. Wagner were each granted 21,000 share options upon their appointment as directors of the Company on September 4, 2019. A discussion of the assumptions used in determining grant date fair value may be found in Note 7 to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

 

(3)

Amount paid pursuant to a consulting agreement between the Company and Dr. Verdine.

(4)Amount paid as a fee for the provision of scientific advisory services to Wave Life Sciences Japan, Inc., or Wave Japan, our wholly owned subsidiary, and reflects the converted to U.S. dollar value of ¥2,935,000 at an average conversion rate for 2017 of 112.50 yen per U.S. dollar.

The following is a descriptiontable shows the aggregate number of the standard compensation arrangementsshares subject to options held by each of ournon-employee directors as of December 31, 2019.

Name

Aggregate
Number of
Shares
Subject to
Options

Christian Henry

46,500

Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D.

21,000

Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D.

37,500

Koji Miura

37,500

Amy Pott

21,000

Adrian Rawcliffe

46,500

Ken Takanashi

37,500

Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D.

303,902

Heidi L. Wagner, J.D.

21,000

At our 2019 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders overwhelmingly approved our 2019Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy, under which our directors arewere compensated for their service as directors, including as members of the various committees of our Board of Directors. In 2016, ouron which they serve, for the Board of Directors and our shareholders approved a compensation policy for our

non-employee directors, or theNon-Employee Director Compensation Policy, which took effectservice period that commenced on November 10, 2016. At the 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved the extension of the term of ourNon-Employee Director Compensation Policy through the date on which our 2018 AGM is held. The approval of Proposal 3 would extend the term of ourNon-Employee Director Compensation Policy through the date on which our 2019 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is held and amend the terms of the compensation payable thereunder as set forth in Proposal 3. On August 10, 2017, our shareholders approved the followingnon-employee director compensation be paid to ournon-employee directors fromruns through the date of our 2017 AGM through the date2020 AGM. The terms of the 2018 AGM:2019Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy are as follows:

 

Annual cash compensation of $35,000$40,000 to eachnon-employee director, other than the Chairman of the Board, and cash compensation of $60,000$72,500 to thenon-employee Chairman of the Board.

Additional annual cash compensation of $15,000$16,000 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and $7,500$8,000 to each member of the Audit Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

 

Additional annual cash compensation of $10,000$12,000 to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and $5,000$6,000 to each member of the Compensation Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

 

Additional annual cash compensation of $8,000$10,000 to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and $4,000$5,000 to each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

 

One-time equity grant upon initial appointment or election to the Board of an option to purchase 18,00021,000 ordinary shares, 25% of which shall vest on the first anniversary of the grant and the remaining 75% of which shall vest monthlyquarterly thereafter for three years.

 

Annual equity grant of an option to purchase 9,00010,500 ordinary shares, all of which shall vest on the first anniversary of the grant.

Additional pro rata cash compensation of the annual cash compensation amounts set forth above shall be made, as applicable, to (i) any director who ceases to be a director, Chairman of the Board or member or chairman of any committee of the Board and (ii) any newnon-employee director who is appointed by the Board, any independent director who is appointed to the position of Chairman of the Board or chairman of any such committee of the Board or any independent director who is appointed to serve on any such committee of the Board, for their services rendered as a director and/or committee member.member, for the portion of the year in which such director so served. In Proposal 3, as required by Singapore law, we are now asking our shareholders to approve the terms of a 2020non-employee director compensation policy, which would take effect on the date of our 2020 AGM for the Board service period commencing on the date of our 2020 AGM and running through the date on which our 2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is held. Please see Proposal 3 below for the terms of the 2020non-employee director compensation policy.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides certain information with respect to our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, which was our only equity compensation plan in effect as of December 31, 2017.2019.

 

Plan Category

Number of Securities
to be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance under
Equity
Compensation Plans

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

3,921,589(1)$12.69(2)1,716,110

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

—  —  —  

Total

3,921,589(1)$12.69(2)1,716,110

Plan Category

  Number of Securities
to be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (1)
   Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights(2)
   Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance under
Equity
Compensation Plans (3)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   5,590,411   $19.54    2,081,856 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   —      —      —   

Total

   5,590,411   $19.54    2,081,856 

 

(1)

Consists of options to purchase 3,767,1303,838,549 of our ordinary shares outstanding under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, and 154,459950,802 of our ordinary shares subject to performance-based RSUs outstanding under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and 801,060 of our ordinary shares subject to time-based RSUs outstanding under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.

 

(2)

Reflects the weighted average exercise price of the options to purchase 3,767,1303,838,549 of our ordinary shares outstanding under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.

(3)

The number of shares available for future grants under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan automatically increases on the first day of July 2018, 2019 and 2020 by an amount equal to the lesser of (A) 3% of the ordinary shares outstanding on the day prior to the increase; and (B) such lesser number of ordinary shares as determined by the Board. Accordingly, on July 1, 2018 and 2019, the number of shares available for future grants increased by 878,800 and 1,027,987 shares, respectively. Additionally, 1,000,000 shares were made available for sale under the 2019 Employee Share Purchase Plan effective August 15, 2019.

REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has furnished the following report:

The Audit Committee assists the Board in overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial reporting process, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the quality of internal and external audit processes. The committee’s role and responsibilities are set forth in the Audit Committee charter adopted by the Board, which is available on our website at www.wavelifesciences.com. This committee reviews and reassesses ourits charter annually and recommends any changes to the Board for approval. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our overall financial reporting process, and for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the work of KPMG LLP. In fulfilling its responsibilities for the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Audit Committee took the following actions:

 

Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 with management and KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm;firm and independent Singapore auditor;

 

  

Discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed in accordance with Auditing Standard No. 1301 –Communications with Audit Committees; and

 

Received written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP regarding its independence as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG LLP communications with the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee further discussed with KPMG LLP their independence. The Audit Committee also considered the status of pending litigation, taxation matters and other areas of oversight relating to the financial reporting and audit process that the committee determined appropriate.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review of the audited financial statements and discussions with management and KPMG LLP, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 for filing with the SEC.

 

Members of the Audit Committee

Christian Henry, Chair

Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D.

Koji Miura
Adrian Rawcliffe

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

With the exception of Form 4s required to report the receipt of annual option grants to each of ournon-employee directors, Drs. Kolchinsky and Verdine, and Messrs. Henry, Miura, Rawcliffe, and Takanashi, on August 10, 2017, the date of our 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, pursuant to our publicly filednon-employee director compensation policy, which were filed on August 17, 2017 (but were due on August 14, 2017), our records reflect that all reports that were required to be filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were filed on a timely basis.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

The following includes a summary of transactions since January 1, 20172019 to which we have been a party, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded $120,000, and in which any of our directors, executive officers or beneficial owners of more than 5% of our ordinary shares, on anas-converted basis, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than equity and other compensation, termination, change in control and other arrangements, which are described under “Executive Officer and Director Compensation.” We refer to such transactions as “related party transactions” or “related person transactions” and such persons as “related parties.parties” or “related persons.” With the approval of our Board, of Directors, we have engaged in the related party transactions described below.

Related PartyPerson Transaction Policy

Our Board of Directors has adopted a written related person transaction policy that requires future transactions between us and any director, executive officer, holder of 5% or more of any class of our managementcapital stock or any member of the immediate family of, or entities affiliated with, any of them, or any other related persons, as defined in Item 404 of RegulationS-K, or their affiliates, in which the amount involved is equal to identify proposed related party transactions and present information about the proposed related party transaction toor greater than $120,000, be approved in advance by our Audit Committee, or if Audit Committee approval would be inappropriate, toby another independent body of our Board of Directors, for review and, if deemed appropriate, for approval by the committee.Board. In approving or rejecting such proposed related partyperson transaction, the committee is required to consider all available information deemed relevant factsby the committee, including, but not limited to, the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction and whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable to us than terms we could have generally obtained from an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances. The committee approves only those transactions that, in light of known circumstances, are deemed to be in our best interests. In the event that any member of the committee is not a disinterested person with respect to the related partyperson transaction under review, that member is excluded from the review and approval or rejection of such related partyperson transaction; provided, however, that such committee member may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting of the committee at which such transaction is considered. If we become aware of an existing related partyperson transaction which has not been approved under the policy, the matter will be referred to the committee. The committee evaluates all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction. In the event that management determines that it is impractical or undesirable to wait until a meeting of the committee to consummate a related partyperson transaction, the chair of the committee may approve such transaction in accordance with the related person transaction approval policy. Any such approval must be reported to the committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

Indemnification Agreements with Officers and Directors

We have entered into deeds of indemnity with our directors and our executive officers. These agreements will require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Singapore law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. These indemnification rights shall not be exclusive of any other right which an indemnified person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, provision of our Constitution, agreement, vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise if he or she is subsequently found to have been negligent or otherwise have breached his or her trust or fiduciary duties or to be in default thereof, or where the Singapore courts have declined to grant relief.

Participation in Our Public Offering

Registration Rights

Registration Rights Under Our Investors’ Rights Agreement

AsOn January 28, 2019, we closed afollow-on underwritten public offering of June 15, 2018, the holders of approximately 7.3 million of our3,950,000 ordinary shares are entitled to rights with respect tofor gross proceeds of $150.1 million, and on February 26, 2019, we closed on the registrationsale of thesean additional 592,500 ordinary shares under the Securities Act pursuant to the underwriters’ option (on the same terms and conditions as the initial closing) for gross proceeds of the Investors’ Rights Agreement dated asan additional $22.5 million. Affiliates of August 14, 2015 between us and the holders of these shares. The rights include demand registration rights, FormS-3 registration rights and piggyback registration rights. We are generally required to bear all registration expenses incurred in connection with the demand, FormS-3 and piggyback registrations described below, other than underwriting commissions and discounts, and will pay the reasonable fees and expenses, not to exceed $25,000, of one special counsel to represent all participating shareholders in a registration. The holders of registration rights as of June 15, 2018 under the Investors’ Rights Agreement include the following related parties:

Name

Securities

Entities affiliated with Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd.(1)

1,859,130

Entities affiliated with RA Capital Healthcare Fund, L.P.(2)

5,213,651

Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D.

75,039

Paul B. Bolno, M.D.

190,856

(1)Consists of (i) 1,697,467RA Capital Management, L.P., or “RA Capital,” purchased 263,158 ordinary shares held by SNBL and (ii) 161,663 ordinary shares held by SNBL USA, an affiliate of SNBL.

(2)Consists of (i) 5,012,057 ordinary shares held by RA Capital and (ii) 201,594 shares held in a separately managed account for which RA Capital Management, LLC, the general partner of RA Capital, is investment advisor.

Demand Registration Rights

Under the terms of the Investors’ Rights Agreement, we will be required, upon the request of holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding shares of Registrable Securities, as such term is defined in the Investors’ Rights Agreement, requesting registration ofpublic offering at least 50% of the then-outstanding shares of Registrable Securities having an anticipated aggregatepublic offering price of at least $25.0 million, net$38.00 per share. RA

Capital is the investment manager of selling expenses, to effect the registrationRA Capital Healthcare Fund, L.P., one of such shares on FormS-1 for public resale. We are required to effect only one registration pursuant to this provision of the Investors’ Rights Agreement.

Form S-3 Registration Rights

At any time that we are entitled under the Securities Act to register our shares onForm S-3 and the holders of at least 30% of the then-outstanding Registrable Securities request that we register their shares for public resale onForm S-3 with an aggregate offering price of the shares to be registered of at least $5.0 million, net of selling expenses, we will be required to effect such registration. If, however, our Chief Executive Officer certifies that, in the good faith judgmentprincipal shareholders. Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D., a member of our Board, is the Managing Partner of Directors, it would be materially detrimental to us and our shareholders for such registration to become or remain effective because such action would (i) materially interfere with a significant acquisition, corporate reorganization or similar transaction involving us, (ii) require premature disclosure of material information that we have a bona fide business purpose for preserving as confidential, or (iii) render us unable to comply with requirements under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, then we will have the right to defer the registration for up to 120 days. We are only obligated to effect up to one registration onForm S-3 within any12-month period.

Piggyback Registration Rights

If we register any of our securities either for our own account or for the account of other shareholders, the holders of these shares are entitled to include their shares in the registration. Subject to certain exceptions, we

and the underwriters may limit the number of shares included in the underwritten offering if the underwriters believe that including these shares would adversely affect the offering.

Indemnification

Our Investors’ Rights Agreement contains customary cross-indemnification provisions, under which we are obligated to indemnify holders of Registrable Securities in the event of material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement attributable to us, and they are obligated to indemnify us for material misstatements or omissions attributable to them.

Termination of Registration Rights

The registration rights granted under the Investors’ Rights Agreement will terminate on the third anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering (November 16, 2018) or, with respect to any holder of Registrable Securities, such earlier time as all such Registrable Securities held by such holder are available for resale without limitation during a three-month period without registration, pursuant to Rule 144 or another similar exemption under the Securities Act.

Registration Rights under our Share Purchase Agreement

Under the terms of the Pfizer Equity Agreement (defined below), the 1,875,000 ordinary shares that the Pfizer Affiliate purchased from us under the Pfizer Equity Agreement (the “Pfizer Shares”) were subject to alock-up restriction, such that the Pfizer Affiliate agreed not to, nor cause its affiliates to, without our prior approval, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Pfizer Shares until certain specified periods of time after the effective date of the Pfizer Equity Agreement. For a certain period following the expiration of thelock-up period, subject to certain conditions and limitations, we agreed to provide certain demand registration rights to the Pfizer Affiliate in order to register all or a portion of the Pfizer Shares purchased by the Pfizer Affiliate. We also provided the Pfizer Affiliate with certain “piggyback” registration rights for a certain period following the expiration of thelock-up period, subject to certain conditions and limitations, such that when we propose to register our ordinary shares for our account, the Pfizer Affiliate will have the right to include some or all of the Pfizer Shares in such registration. The Pfizer Equity Agreement also contains other customary terms and conditions of the parties with respect to the registration of the Pfizer Shares.RA Capital.

Consulting Agreement with Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D.

Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D., a member of our Board, of Directors, entered into a consulting agreement with Wave Life Sciences USA, Inc., or Wave“Wave USA, our wholly owned subsidiary, dated as of April 1, 2012, pursuant to which Dr. Verdine serves as a scientific advisor. The consulting agreement does not have a specified term and may be terminated by either party upon 14 days’ prior written notice. Wave USA pays Dr. Verdine $12,500 per month and, in 2017,2019, Dr. Verdine was paid an aggregate of $150,000 under this agreement.

Scientific Advisory Arrangement with Takeshi Wada, Ph.D.

Takeshi Wada, Ph.D., elected to step down from our Board of Directors, effective January 31, 2017, and is continuing to work with us as a scientific advisor. During 2017, Dr. Wada continued to provide scientific advisory services to Wave Life Sciences Japan, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary. In January 2017, he was compensated under apre-existing arrangement that entitled him to ¥250,000 per month, which amounted to approximately $2,000 per month. For the remainder of 2017, Dr. Wada was compensated under a new scientific advisory services agreement, which entitled him to ¥335,000 per month, and amounted to approximately $3,000 per month. In 2017, we paid Dr. Wada approximately $26,290 in the aggregate for these scientific advisory services.

Agreements with SNBL

Ken Takanashi, a member of our Board of Directors, is a director and executive officer of SNBL and its affiliates. Previously, we leased our corporate office space in Boston, Massachusetts under anon-cancellable operating sublease with SNBL, a related party. On September 22, 2015, we terminated our sublease with SNBL and exited the premises on October 2, 2015. In connection with the termination, we agreed to guarantee SNBL certain obligations of an unrelated third party who entered into a sublease agreement with SNBL effective October 2, 2015. The guarantee provides that in the event thesub-lessee does not meet its lease obligations to SNBL, we will make the required payments. The guarantee agreement is effective through August 2019, when the final lease payments are due, and coincides with the original expiration of the lease. We simultaneously entered into an indemnification agreement with thesub-lessee to indemnify us for any costs incurred under the guaranty made by us to SNBL. The maximum amount of the guarantee over the three-year andsix-month sublease period is $0.6 million, exclusive of any indemnification from thesub-lessee.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of certain service agreements we have with SNBL, in 2017, we paid SNBL $0.5 million for contract research services provided to us and our affiliates.

Banking Relationship with KSS

Masaharu Tanaka, a member of our Board of Directors through August 2017, served as the President of Kagoshima Development Co. Ltd., the general partner of KSS, from June 2014 to March 2017. We maintained depository accounts at Kagoshima Bank, Ltd. during 2017, an affiliate of KSS, where we held certain of our cash balances. These accounts were closed in 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we hadend-of-quarter cash balances of up to approximately $127 thousand in these depository accounts.

Agreements with Pfizer and its Affiliate

On May 5, 2016, we entered into a Research, License and Option Agreement with Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”), which we refer to herein as the “Pfizer Collaboration Agreement.” Simultaneously with the entry into the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, on May 5, 2016, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement, or the “Pfizer Equity Agreement,” with C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V., an affiliate of Pfizer, or the “Pfizer Affiliate.” We refer to the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement and the Pfizer Equity Agreement herein collectively as the “Pfizer Agreements.”

Pursuant to the terms of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, we and Pfizer have agreed to collaborate on the discovery, development and commercialization of stereopure oligonucleotide therapeutics for up to five programs (each, a “Pfizer Program”), each directed at a genetically-defined hepatic target selected by Pfizer. Under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the parties agreed to collaborate during a four-year research term. The term of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement runs from the effective date until the date of the last to expire payment obligations with respect to each Pfizer Program and with respect to each Company program, and expires on aprogram-by-program basis accordingly.

Under the terms of the Pfizer Agreements, Pfizer paid us $40.0 million upfront, $30.0 million of which was in the form of an equity investment in our ordinary shares. Subject to option exercises by Pfizer, assuming five potential products are successfully developed and commercialized, we may earn potential research, development and commercial milestone payments, plus royalties, tiered up to low double-digits, on sales of any products that may result from the collaboration pursuant to the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement.

Under the Pfizer Equity Agreement, we issued 1,875,000 ordinary shares, or the “Pfizer Shares,” to the Pfizer Affiliate at a purchase price of $16.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $30.0 million. Under the terms of the Pfizer Equity Agreement, the Pfizer Shares were subject to alock-up restriction, such that the Pfizer Affiliate agreed not to, nor cause its affiliates to, without our prior approval, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Pfizer Shares until certain specified periods of time after the effective date of the Pfizer Equity Agreement. We also agreed to provide the Pfizer Affiliate with registration rights, as described under “Registration Rights” above.

Rights under our Share Purchase Agreement with Pfizer” below.

Registration Rights under our Share Purchase Agreement with Pfizer

Under the terms of our Pfizer Equity Agreement, the Pfizer Affiliate agreed that the Pfizer Shares were subject to alock-up restriction, such that the Pfizer Affiliate agreed not to, nor cause its affiliates to, without our prior approval, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Pfizer Shares until certain specified periods of time after the effective date of the Pfizer Equity Agreement. For a certain period following the expiration of thelock-up period, subject to certain conditions and limitations, we agreed to provide certain demand registration rights to the Pfizer Affiliate in order to register all or a portion of the Pfizer Shares purchased by the Pfizer Affiliate. We also provided the Pfizer Affiliate with certain “piggyback” registration rights for a certain period following the expiration of thelock-up period, subject to certain conditions and limitations, such that when we propose to register our ordinary shares for our account, the Pfizer Affiliate will have the right to include some or all of the Pfizer Shares in such registration. The Pfizer Equity Agreement also contains other customary terms and conditions of the parties with respect to the registration of the Pfizer Shares.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Constitution requires that each of our directors retire at each annual general meeting of our shareholders, and each retiring director is then eligible forre-election. The Board of Directors, acting on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated each of Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA, Mark H.N. Corrigan, M.D., Christian Henry, Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D., Koji Miura,Amy Pott, Adrian Rawcliffe, Ken Takanashi, andAik Na Tan, Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D. and Heidi L. Wagner, J.D. for election at the 20182020 AGM. Voting on the election of each nominee will be done separately. If each such nominee is elected, he or she will serve on our Board of Directors until our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.

Pursuant to the Singapore Companies Act and our Constitution, our Board must have at least one director who is ordinarily resident in Singapore. Mr. Miura, who is currently our Singapore resident director, is expected to retire upon the conclusion of the 2020 AGM. In connection with Mr. Miura’s retirement, the Board, on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated Aik Na Tan for election as a new director who will act as our Singapore resident director. Due toIn accordance with the requirements of the Singapore Companies Act requirement that we have at least one director who is ordinarily resident in Singapore in office at all times, and the sole resident director cannot resign or step down unless there is at least one other resident director, in the event that Mr. MiuraMs. Tan is not elected at the 20182020 AGM, heMr. Miura will continue in office after the 20182020 AGM as a member of our Board until his qualifying successor (i.e., a Singapore resident director) is appointed. If Ms. Tan is elected at the 2020 AGM, Mr. Miura will retire upon the conclusion of the 2020 AGM.

Each of the nominees is presently a director, and each has indicated a willingness to continue to serve as director, if elected. We have no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director.

Each nominee for director who receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of ordinary shares voting either in person or by proxy at the 20182020 AGM will be elected (meaning the number of shares voted “for” a nominee must exceed the number of shares voted “against” such nominee).

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF PAUL B. BOLNO, M.D., MBA, MARK H.N. CORRIGAN, M.D., CHRISTIAN HENRY, PETER KOLCHINSKY, PH.D., KOJI MIURA,AMY POTT, ADRIAN RAWCLIFFE, KEN TAKANASHI, ANDAIK NA TAN, GREGORY L. VERDINE, PH.D. AND HEIDI L. WAGNER, J.D. AS DIRECTORS, AND PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR THEREOF UNLESS A SHAREHOLDER HAS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.

PROPOSAL 2: INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND

INDEPENDENT SINGAPORE AUDITOR AND

AUDITOR REMUNERATION

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2020.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, KPMG LLP was our independent registered public accounting firm and the independent Singapore auditor of our Singapore Statutory Financial Statements. Pursuant to Section 205(2) and 205(4) of the Singapore Companies Act, anyre-appointment after the initial appointment of our independent Singapore auditor, or its subsequent removal, requires the approval of our shareholders. The Board proposes that the shareholders approve there-appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and the independent Singapore auditor of our Singapore Statutory Financial Statements.

We expect that representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the 20182020 AGM, will be able to make a statement if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Pursuant to Section 205(16) of the Singapore Companies Act, the remuneration of a company’s auditor shall be fixed by the shareholders in a general meeting or the shareholders may authorize directors to fix the remuneration. Our Board believes that it is appropriate for the Audit Committee, as part of its oversight responsibilities, to fix the auditor’s remuneration. Our Board therefore also proposes that the shareholders authorize the Audit Committee to fix KPMG LLP’s remuneration for services rendered as our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor through the date of our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

In deciding tore-appoint KPMG LLP, the Audit Committee reviewed auditor independence issues and existing commercial relationships with KPMG LLP and concluded that KPMG LLP has no commercial relationship with the Company that would impair its independence for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2020.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, and independent Singapore auditor, for the services described in the table.

 

  2017   2016   2019   2018 

Audit fees(1)

  $1,143,931   $633,671   $1,627,094   $1,458,814 

Audit-related fees(2)

   —      —      —      —   

Tax fees(2)

   —      —      —      —   

All other fees(2)

   —      —      —      —   
  

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Audit fees consisted of audit work performed in the preparation of financial statements, as well as work generally only the independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, such as statutory audits and the provision of consents in connection with the filing of registration statements and related amendments, as well as other filings.

 

(2)

There were no audit-related, tax or other fees in 20162018 or 2017.2019.

Policy on Audit CommitteePre-Approval of Audit and PermissibleNon-Audit Services of Independent Public Accountant and Independent Singapore Auditor

In connection with our initial public offering, we adopted a policy under which the Audit Committee mustpre-approve all audit and permissiblenon-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public

accounting firm.firm and independent Singapore auditor. As part of its review, the Audit Committee also considers whether the categories ofpre-approved services are consistent with the rules on accountant independence of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committeepre-approved all services performed since thepre-approval policy was adopted.

Prior to engagement of an independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor for the next year’s audit, management will submit an aggregate of services expected to be rendered during that year for each of four categories of services to the Audit Committee for approval.

1.Auditservices include audit work performed in the preparation of financial statements, as well as work that generally only an independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, including comfort letters, statutory audits, and attest services and consultation regarding financial accounting and/or reporting standards.

2.Audit-related services are for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by an independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor, including due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, employee benefit plan audits, and special procedures required to meet certain regulatory requirements.

3.Tax services include all services performed by an independent registered public accounting firm’s tax personnel except those services specifically related to the audit of the financial statements, and includes fees in the areas of tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.

4.Other fees are those associated with services not captured in the other categories. The Company generally does not request such services from our independent registered public accounting firm.firm and independent Singapore auditor.

Prior to engagement, the Audit Committeepre-approves these services by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor for additional services not contemplated in the originalpre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specificpre-approval before engaging our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor. The Audit Committee may delegatepre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, anypre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares voting in person or by proxy at the 20182020 AGM is required to approve there-appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and our independent Singapore auditor and to authorize the Audit Committee to fix the auditor’s remuneration (meaning the number of shares voted “for” the proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” the proposal).

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL OF THERE-APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND INDEPENDENT SINGAPORE AUDITOR FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 20182020 AND THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE TO FIX KPMG LLP’S REMUNERATION FOR SUCH SERVICES, AND PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF SUCH APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION UNLESS A SHAREHOLDER INDICATES OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.

PROPOSAL 3:NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION

Under the laws of Singapore, our shareholders must approve all cash and equity-based compensation paid by us to our directors for services rendered in their capacity as directors.

In 2016, our Board of Directors and our shareholders approved a compensation policy for ournon-employee directors, or theNon-Employee Director Compensation Policy, which took effect on November 10, 2016 and remains in effect through the date of the 2018 AGM. Proposal 3 would extend the term of ourNon-Employee Director Compensation Policy through the date on whichAt our 2019 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, is heldour shareholders overwhelmingly approved our 2019non-employee director compensation policy, under which our directors were compensated for their service as directors, including as members of the various committees of our Board on which they serve, for the Board service period that commenced on the date of our 2019 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and amendruns through our 2020 AGM.

We are now asking our shareholders to approve the terms of our 2020non-employee director compensation policy, the terms of which are the same as the terms of our 2019non-employee director compensation payable thereunder such that the resulting compensation will be as described below.policy.

Accordingly, we are seeking shareholder approval to provide payment of the following compensation pursuant to such 2020non-employee director compensation policy to ournon-employee directors for service on the Board and its committees duringfor the Board service period fromcommencing on the 2018date of our 2020 AGM through and includingrunning through the date on which our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is held:

 

Annual cash compensation of $40,000 to eachnon-employee director, an increase from the current annual cash compensation of $35,000, other than the Chairman of the Board, and cash compensation of $65,000 to thenon-employee Chairman of the Board, an increase from the current annual cash compensation of $60,000.

Board of Directors: Annual cash compensation of $40,000 to eachnon-employee director, other than the Chairman of the Board, and cash compensation of $72,500 to thenon-employee Chairman of the Board.

 

Additional annual cash compensation of $15,000 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and $7,500 to each member of the Audit Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

Audit Committee: Additional annual cash compensation of $16,000 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and $8,000 to each member of the Audit Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

 

Additional annual cash compensation of $10,000 to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and $5,000 to each member of the Compensation Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

Compensation Committee: Additional annual cash compensation of $12,000 to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and $6,000 to each member of the Compensation Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

 

Additional annual cash compensation of $8,000 to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and $4,000 to each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: Additional annual cash compensation of $10,000 to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and $5,000 to each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee other than the Chairman, in each case provided that such person is an independent director.

 

One-time equity grant upon initial appointment or election to the Board of an option to purchase 18,000 ordinary shares, 25% of which shall vest on the first anniversary of the grant and the remaining 75% of which shall vest quarterly thereafter for three years. This quarterly vesting represents a change from our prior monthly vesting, which we made to our company-wide standard vesting schedule.

Initial Equity Grant:One-time equity grant upon initial appointment or election to the Board of an option to purchase 21,000 ordinary shares, 25% of which shall vest on the first anniversary of the grant and the remaining 75% of which shall vest quarterly thereafter for three years.

 

Annual equity grant of an option to purchase 9,000 ordinary shares, all of which shall vest on the first anniversary of the grant.

Annual Equity Grant: Annual equity grant of an option to purchase 10,500 ordinary shares, all of which shall vest on the earlier of the 2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders or the first anniversary of the date of grant.

 

Additional pro rata cash compensation of the annual cash compensation amounts set forth above shall be made, as applicable, to (i) any director who ceases to be a director, Chairman of the Board or member or chairman of any committee of the Board and (ii) any newnon-employee director who is appointed by the Board, any independent director who is appointed to the position of Chairman of the Board or chairman of any such committee of the Board or any independent director who is appointed to serve on any such committee of the Board, for their services rendered as a director and/or committee member.

Proration: Additional pro rata cash compensation of the annual cash compensation amounts set forth above shall be made, as applicable, to (i) any director who ceases to be a director, Chairman of the Board or member or chairman of any committee of the Board and (ii) any newnon-employee director who is appointed by the Board, any independent director who is appointed to the position of Chairman of the Board or chairman of any such committee of the Board or any independent director who is appointed to serve on any such committee of the Board, for their services rendered as a director and/or committee member, for the portion of the year in which such director so served.

Directors who are employed by us are ineligible to receive compensation from us for services rendered in their capacity as directors.

We believe the authorization requested in this Proposal 3 will benefit our shareholders by enabling us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as members of our Board and to continue to provide leadership to the Company.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares voting in person or by proxy at the 20182020 AGM is required to approve thenon-employee directors’ compensation (meaning the number of shares voted “for” the proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” the proposal).

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THENON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION AND PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR THEREOF UNLESS A SHAREHOLDER HAS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.

PROPOSAL 4: ORDINARY SHARE ALLOTMENTS AND ISSUANCES

We are incorporated in the Republic of Singapore. Under the laws of Singapore, our directors may issue ordinary shares and make offers or agreements or grant options that might or would require the issuance of ordinary shares only with the prior approval of our shareholders. We are submitting this proposal to authorize our Board (or a committee thereof) to allot and issue our ordinary shares from time to time, as set forth below, because we are required to do so under the laws of Singapore before we can issue any ordinary shares in connection with our equity compensation plans, possible future strategic transactions, or public and private offerings.

If this proposal is approved, the authorization would be effective from the date of the 20182020 AGM and continue until the earlier of (i) the conclusion of our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders or (ii) the expiration of the period within which our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is required by the laws of Singapore to be held. Our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders is required to be held no later than 15 months after the date of the 20182020 AGM or within six months fromafter the 2020 financial year end, whichever is earlier.The laws of Singapore allow for an application to be made to the Singapore Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority to extend the deadline for holding an annual general meeting for an additional maximum of two months, which may be granted in the discretion of that authority.

Our Board believes that it is advisable and in the best interests of our shareholders for our shareholders to authorize the directors to issue ordinary shares and to make, enter into or grant offers, agreements or options that might or would require the issuance of ordinary shares. In the future, the directors may need to issue ordinary shares or make agreements that would require the allotment and issuance of new ordinary shares. For example, we may issue ordinary shares:

 

in connection with strategic transactions and acquisitions;

 

pursuant to public and private offerings of our ordinary shares, as well as instruments (including debt instruments) convertible into our ordinary shares; or

 

in connection with our equity compensation plans and arrangements.

Notwithstanding this general authorization to allot and issue our ordinary shares, we will be required to seek shareholder approval with respect to future issuances of ordinary shares, where required under the Nasdaq Stock Market rules, such as if we were to propose an issuance of ordinary shares that would result in a change in control of the Company or in connection with certain transactions involving the issuance of ordinary shares representing 20% or more of our outstanding ordinary shares.

We expect that we will continue to issue ordinary shares and grant share options and other equity-based awards in the future under circumstances similar to those in the past. As of the date of this proxy statement, other than issuances of ordinary shares or agreements that would require the issuance of new ordinary shares in connection with our equity compensation plans and arrangements, including any equity compensation plans and awards we have assumed or may assume as a result of any acquisitions we may make, we have no specific plans, agreements or commitments to issue any ordinary shares for which approval of this proposal is required. Nevertheless, our Board believes that it is advisable and in the best interests of our shareholders for our shareholders to provide this general authorization in order to avoid the delay and expense of obtaining shareholder approval at a later date, and to provide us with greater flexibility to pursue strategic transactions and acquisitions and raise additional capital through public and private offerings of our ordinary shares, as well as instruments convertible into our ordinary shares.

If this proposal is approved, our directors would be authorized to allot and issue ordinary shares, during the period described above, subject to our Constitution, applicable Singapore laws and the Nasdaq Stock Market rules. The issuance of a large number of ordinary shares (or instruments convertible into ordinary shares) could

be dilutive to existing shareholders or reduce the trading price of our ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Global Market. If this proposal is not approved, we would not be permitted to issue ordinary shares (other than shares issuable on exercise or settlement of outstanding options and other instruments convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares or the like, which were previously granted). If we are unable to rely upon equity as a component of compensation, we would have to review our compensation practices, and would likely have to substantially increase cash compensation to retain key personnel.

Accordingly, our Board seeks shareholder approval of Ordinary Resolution 4 as set out in the Notice. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares held by the shareholders presentvoting in person or represented by proxy at the 20182020 AGM and entitled to vote on the proposal is required to authorize the Board of Directors to allot and issue ordinary shares of the Company (meaning the number of shares voted “for” the proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” the proposal).

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE AUTHORIZATION OF ORDINARY SHARE ALLOTMENTS AND ISSUANCES AND PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR THEREOF UNLESS A SHAREHOLDER HAS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.

PROPOSAL 5:NON-BINDING ADVISORY RESOLUTION ON APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT

We are seeking your advisory vote (on anon-binding, advisory basis only) as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act on the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related material contained in this proxy statement. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on our Compensation Committee or our Board. However, the Compensation Committee and our Board will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation. We have determined to hold an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers annually, and the next such advisory vote will occur at our 2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

Our compensation philosophy is designed to align each executive’s compensation with our short-term and long-term performance and to provide the compensation and incentives needed to attract, motivate and retain key executives who are crucial to our long-term success. Shareholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, which discusses how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee and our Board believe that these policies and procedures are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving its goals. Therefore, we are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say on pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

In accordance with the rules of the SEC, the following proposal is being submitted for anon-binding, advisory shareholder vote at the 2020 AGM:

“RESOLVED, on anon-binding, advisory basis only, that the compensation paid to the named executive officers of the Company, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related material disclosed in this proxy statement, is hereby APPROVED.”

Thisnon-binding advisory resolution is being proposed to shareholders as required pursuant to the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act. The shareholders’ vote on this proposal is solely advisory andnon-binding in nature, will have no legal effect for purposes of Singapore law and will not be enforceable against our Company or our Board. For the avoidance of doubt, this is not an Ordinary Resolution.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares voting in person or by proxy at the 2020 AGM is required to approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis only, the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement (meaning the number of shares voted “for” the proposal must exceed the number of shares voted “against” the proposal). Although the advisory resolution isnon-binding, the Compensation Committee and our Board will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL (ON ANON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS ONLY) OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR THEREOF UNLESS A SHAREHOLDER HAS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees.employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. The text of the code of conduct and ethics is posted on our website at www.wavelifesciences.com. Disclosure regarding any amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of the code of conduct and ethics that apply to our directors, principal executive officer or principal financial officer will be included in a Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver, unless website posting or the issuance of a press release of such amendments or waivers is then permitted by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors knows of no other business which will be presented at the 20182020 AGM. If any other business is properly brought before the 20182020 AGM, proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons named therein.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR DIRECTOR

To be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement relating to our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, we must receive shareholder proposals (other than for director nominations) no later than March 4, 2019.2, 2021. To be considered for presentation at our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, although not included in the proxy statement, proposals (including director nominations that are not requested to be included in our proxy statement) must be received no later than May 18, 2019.16, 2021. Shareholder proposals are also subject to the requirements of the Singapore Companies Act as described in the paragraph below. Proposals that are not received in a timely manner will not be voted on at our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. If a proposal is received on time, the proxies that management solicits for the meeting may still exercise discretionary voting authority on the proposal under circumstances consistent with the proxy rules of the SEC. All shareholder proposals should be marked for the attention of General Counsel, Wave Life Sciences Ltd., 733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138.

In addition, under Section 183 of the Singapore Companies Act, only registered shareholders representing not less than 5% of the total voting rights or registered shareholders representing not fewer than 100 registered shareholders having an average paid up sum of at least S$500 (Singapore dollars) each may, at their expense, request that we include and give notice of their proposal for our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. Subject to satisfaction of the requirements of Section 183 of the Singapore Companies Act, any such requisition must be signed by all the shareholders making the request and be deposited at our registered office in Singapore, 7 Straits View#12-00, Marina One East Tower, Singapore 018936, at least six weeks prior to the date of our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in the case of a request requiring notice of a resolution, or at least one week prior to the date of our 20192021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in the case of any other request.

Cambridge, Massachusetts

June 28, 201826, 2020

Appendix A

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Registration Number: 201218209G

Singapore Statutory Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019


Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Singapore Statutory Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

Index

 

   Page 

Directors’ Statements

   3 

Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

   67 

Consolidated Financial Statements of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

   F-1 

Supplementary Financial Information of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (Parent Company)

   F-33F-35 

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Directors’ Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

Directors’ Statements

The directors are pleased to submit this annual report to the members of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (“the Parent”), together with these directors’ statements, the audited financial statements for the financial year ended December 31, 20172019 and the auditors’ report thereon.

In our opinion:

 

 a)

other than as discussed in the Investment in Subsidiaries paragraph in Note 2 to the supplementary financial information, the consolidated financial statements of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its subsidiaries (together “the Company”) and the supplementary financial information of the Parent set out on pagesF-1 to F-40F-41 are drawn up so as to give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company and of the Parent as at December 31, 2017,2019, the financial performance, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date in accordance with the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, Chapter 50 and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; and

 

 b)

at the date of this statement, there are reasonable grounds to believe that Wave Life Sciences Ltd. will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due.

The board of directors has, on the date of this statement, authorized these financial statements for issue.

Directors

The directors in office at the date of this statement are as follows:

 

Paul B. Bolno

                          Chief Executive Officer

Mark H. N. Corrigan

                        (Appointed on September 4, 2019)

Christian O. Henry

  

Peter Kolchinsky

  

Koji Miura

  

Adrian RawcliffeAmy Pott

                          (Appointed on February 1, 2017)September 4, 2019)

Adrian Rawcliffe

Ken Takanashi

  

Gregory L. Verdine

  

Heidi L. Wagner

                        (Appointed on September 4, 2019)

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Directors’ Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

Directors’ Interests

According to the register kept by Wave Life Sciences Ltd. for the purposes of Section 164 of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 (“the Act”) and the Wave Life Sciences Ltd. option ledger, particulars of interests of directors who held office at the end of the financial year (including those held by their spouses and infant children) in shares, debentures, warrants and share options of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. or in related corporations (other than wholly-owned subsidiaries) are as follows:

 

Name of director and corporation in which interests are held

  Holdings as of
January 1,
2017 or
date of
appointment,
if later
   Holdings as of
December 31,
2017
   Holdings as of
January 1,
2019
or date of
appointment,
if later
   Holdings as of
December 31,
2019
 

Paul B. Bolno

        

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

        

- Ordinary shares

   190,856    190,856    197,217    212,184 

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

        

- US$2.48 between March 10, 2015 and March 10, 2025

   544,025    544,025    494,025    444,025 

- US$18.79 between June 16, 2016 and June 16, 2026

   236,400    236,400    236,400    236,400 

- US$29.05 between January 25, 2017 and January 25, 2027

   —      72,500    72,500    72,500 

- Restricted share units

   —      36,300 

- US$40.05 between January 23, 2018 and January 23, 2028

   109,000    109,000 

- Time-based restricted share units

   81,725    119,025 

- Performance-based restricted share units

   —      185,000 

Mark H. N. Corrigan

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$21.03 between September 4, 2019 and September 4, 2024

   21,000    21,000 

Christian O. Henry

        

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

        

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

        

- US$36.43 between November 10, 2016 and November 10, 2021

   18,000    18,000    18,000    18,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   —      9,000    9,000    9,000 

- US$46.70 between August 13, 2018 and August 13, 2023

   9,000    9,000 

- US$20.34 between August 15, 2019 and August 15, 2024

   —      10,500 

Peter Kolchinsky

        

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

        

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

        

- US$36.43 between November 10, 2016 and November 10, 2021

   9,000    9,000    9,000    9,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   —      9,000    9,000    9,000 

- US$46.70 between August 13, 2018 and August 13, 2023

   9,000    9,000 

- US$20.34 between August 15, 2019 and August 15, 2024

   —      10,500 

Koji Miura

        

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

        

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

        

- US$36.43 between November 10, 2016 and November 10, 2021

   9,000    9,000    9,000    9,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   —      9,000    9,000    9,000 

Adrian Rawcliffe

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$28.80 between February 1, 2017 and February 1, 2022

   —      18,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   —      9,000 

Ken Takanashi

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$36.43 between November 10, 2016 and November 10, 2021

   9,000    9,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   —      9,000 

- US$46.70 between August 13, 2018 and August 13, 2023

   9,000    9,000 

- US$20.34 between August 15, 2019 and August 15, 2024

   —      10,500 

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Directors’ Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

Name of director and corporation in which interests are held

  Holdings as of
January 1,
2017 or
date of
appointment,
if later
   Holdings as of
December 31,
2017
 

Gregory L. Verdine

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Ordinary shares

   150,079    75,039 

- Ordinary shares(1)

   —      75,040 

- Restricted share units(1)

   —      500 

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$2.48 between March 10, 2015 and March 10, 2025

   532,803    532,803 

- US$2.48 between March 10, 2015 and March 10, 2025(1)

   14,699    823 

- US$36.43 between November 10, 2016 and November 10, 2021

   9,000    9,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   —      9,000 

(1)These are held by Kasumi Verdine, Gregory L. Verdine’s spouse. The restricted share units and options were granted to Kasumi Verdine as a part of her compensation as an employee of Wave Life Sciences USA, Inc., a subsidiary of Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Name of director and corporation in which interests are held

  Holdings as of
January 1,
2019
or date of
appointment,
if later
   Holdings as of
December 31,
2019
 

Amy Pott

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$21.03 between September 4, 2019 and September 4, 2024

   21,000    21,000 

Adrian Rawcliffe

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$28.80 between February 1, 2017 and February 1, 2022

   18,000    18,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   9,000    9,000 

- US$46.70 between August 13, 2018 and August 13, 2023

   9,000    9,000 

- US$20.34 between August 15, 2019 and August 15, 2024

   —      10,500 

Ken Takanashi

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$36.43 between November 10, 2016 and November 10, 2021

   9,000    9,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   9,000    9,000 

- US$46.70 between August 13, 2018 and August 13, 2023

   9,000    9,000 

- US$20.34 between August 15, 2019 and August 15, 2024

   —      10,500 

Gregory L. Verdine

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Ordinary shares

   60,039    30,000 

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$2.48 between March 10, 2015 and March 10, 2025

   532,803    266,402 

- US$36.43 between November 10, 2016 and November 10, 2021

   9,000    9,000 

- US$18.10 between August 10, 2017 and August 10, 2022

   9,000    9,000 

- US$46.70 between August 13, 2018 and August 13, 2023

   9,000    9,000 

- US$20.34 between August 15, 2019 and August 15, 2024

   —      10,500 

Heidi L. Wagner

    

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

    

- Options to purchase ordinary shares at:

    

- US$21.03 between September 4, 2019 and September 4, 2024

   21,000    21,000 

Except as disclosed in this statement, no director who held office at the end of the financial year had interests in shares, debentures, warrants or share options of Wave Life Sciences Ltd., or of its related corporations, either at the beginning of the financial year, or date of his/her appointment to this board of directors, if later.

Except as disclosed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, there were no unissued shares of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. or its subsidiaries under options granted by Wave Life Sciences Ltd. or its subsidiaries as of the end of the financial year.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Directors’ Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

Auditors

KPMG LLP werere-appointed as auditors of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. on August 10, 2017.8, 2019. The auditors, KPMG LLP, have indicated their willingness to acceptre-appointment.

On behalf of the board of directors,

 

/s/ Christian O. Henry

  Christian O. Henry

  Director

 

/s/ Paul B. Bolno, M.D.

  Paul B. Bolno, M.D.

  Director

LOGOLOGO

 

KPMG LLP

16 Raffles Quay #22-00

Hong Leong Building

Singapore 048581

Telephone +65 6213 3388

Fax +65 6225 0984

Internet www.kpmg.com.sg

Independent auditors’ report

Members of the Company

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its subsidiaries

Report on the audit of the financial statements

Qualified opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the supplementary financial information of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (the “Parent”), which comprise the balance sheets of the Company and Parent as at December 31, 2017, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, consolidated statements of series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity, and consolidated statements of cash flows of the Company for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies, as set out on pagesF-1 to F-40 (collectively, the “financial statements”).

In our opinion, except for the effects of the matter described in the “Basis for qualified opinion” section of our report, the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the balance sheet of the Parent are properly drawn up in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 (the “Act”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (the use of which is approved by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore) so as to give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company and of the Parent as at December 31, 2017 and of the financial performance, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Basis for qualified opinion

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the investments in subsidiaries be consolidated. For the purposes of the supplementary financial information provided as a part of the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements, the Parent did not consolidate the investments in subsidiaries and reported these investments and the balances with subsidiaries as separate lines in the Parent’s standalone balance sheet. The Parent’s investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by either increasing its initial investment in each subsidiary by that subsidiary’s net income for each financial year or by decreasing its initial investment in each subsidiary by that subsidiary’s net loss for each financial year to the extent of the initial investment of the subsidiary. Our audit opinion on the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 dated June 28, 2017 also included a modification on the same matter.

We conducted our audit in accordance with Singapore Standards on Auditing (“SSAs”). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements”section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory AuthorityCode of Professional Conduct and Ethics for Public Accountants and Accounting Entities (“ACRA Code”) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in Singapore, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the ACRA Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified opinion.

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Independent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 2017

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In addition to the matter described in the “Basis for qualified opinion” section, we have determined the matter described below to be the key audit matter to be communicated in our report.

Revenue recognition under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement

Refer to Note 5 Pfizer Collaboration and Share Purchase Agreement and the accounting policy note on revenue recognition

The key audit matterHow the matter was addressed in our audit

In May 2016, the Company entered into a Research, License and Option Agreement (the “Pfizer Collaboration Agreement”) with Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”). Under the agreement, the Company and Pfizer agreed to collaborate on up to five Pfizer programs over a four year research term, the target nomination period for Pfizer to identify the five Pzifer programs (“targets”) is eighteen months ended November 5, 2017. Pfizer declared two of the five targets upon initiation of the agreement. In 2016, the Company received a $10.0 million payment as an upfront license fee under the agreement and an additional payment following Pfizer’s nomination of the third target in August 2016.

During 2017, the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement was amended to extend the target nomination period from November 5, 2017 to May 5, 2018. Additionally, a milestone was achieved in November 2017 and the revenue related to this milestone was recognized in full during the year.

Revenue of $3.7 million has been recognized as of December 31, 2017. Amounts received prior to satisfaction of revenue criteria have been recorded as deferred revenue, amounting to $8.3 million as of December 31, 2017.

There is judgement required in assessing the deliverables of the arrangement with Pfizer, whether these deliverables are a separate unit of accounting, determining the allocable consideration to be allocated to each unit of accounting, and period over which revenue is recognized. These areas are a key audit focus.

Our audit procedures include:

•  Assessing the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement in accordance to revenue recognition accounting literature for multi-element arrangements to conclude on the identification of separation unit of accounting, determination of allocation consideration, and the period of recognition.

•  Understanding management’s process to develop the estimated period over which the research and development services are fulfilled and assessed management’s memorandum on performance period change.

•  Reading the amendment to Pfizer Collaboration Agreement to extend the target nomination period to ascertain that the amendment has no impact on the current revenue recognition.

•  Agreed invoices issued to and payments received from Pfizer.

•  Performing management enquiries and reading project minutes to identify program changes impacting the timeline.

•  Re-computing the revenue and deferred revenue.

Findings:

We found the assessment of the deliverables in the arrangement, the allocation of consideration to each unit of accounting, and the revenue recognition period to be reasonable.

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Independent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 2017

The above key audit matter applies to both the consolidated financial statements and the supplementary balance sheet.

Other information

Management is responsible for the other information contained in the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements. Other information is defined as all information in the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements other than the financial statements and our auditors’ report thereon. We have obtained all other information prior to the date of this auditors’ report.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Responsibilities of management and directors for the financial statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the provisions of the Act and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for devising and maintaining a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide a reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorised use or disposition; and transactions are properly authorised and that they are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of true and fair financial statements and to maintain accountability of assets.

In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for evaluating whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.

The directors’ responsibilities include overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SSAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SSAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Independent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 2017

is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal controls.

Obtain an understanding of internal controls relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls.

Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditors’ report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditors’ report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Company to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the company audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal controls that we identify during our audit.

We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with the directors, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditors’ report unless the law or regulations preclude public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Independent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 2017

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

In our opinion, the accounting and other records required by the Act to be kept by the Parent have been properly kept in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditors’ report is Chu Sook Fun.

/s/ KPMG

KPMG LLP

Public Accountants and16 Raffles Quay #22-00

Chartered AccountantsHong Leong Building

Singapore 048581

Telephone +65 6213 3388

June 27, 2018Fax +65 6225 0984

Internet www.kpmg.com.sg

Independent auditors’ report

Members of the Company

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its subsidiaries

Report on the audit of the financial statements

Qualified opinion

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the supplementary financial information of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (the “Parent”), which comprise the balance sheets of the Company and Parent as at December 31, 2019, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, consolidated statements of series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity, and consolidated statements of cash flows of the Company for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies, as set out on pagesF-1 toF-41 (collectively, the “financial statements”).

In our opinion, except for the effects of the matter described in the “Basis for qualified opinion” section of our report, the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the balance sheet of the Parent are properly drawn up in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 (the “Act”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (the use of which is approved by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore) so as to give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company and of the Parent as at December 31, 2019 and of the financial performance, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company for the year ended on that date.

Basis for qualified opinion

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the investments in subsidiaries be consolidated. For the purposes of the supplementary financial information provided as a part of the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements, the Parent did not consolidate the investments in subsidiaries and reported these investments and the balances with subsidiaries as separate lines in the Parent’s standalone balance sheet. The Parent’s investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by either increasing its initial investment in each subsidiary by that subsidiary’s net income for each financial year or by decreasing its initial investment in each subsidiary by that subsidiary’s net loss for each financial year to the extent of the initial investment of the subsidiary. Our audit opinion on the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 dated June 26, 2019 also included a modification on the same matter.

We conducted our audit in accordance with Singapore Standards on Auditing (“SSAs”). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements”section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory AuthorityCode of Professional Conduct and Ethics for Public Accountants and Accounting Entities (“ACRA Code”) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in Singapore, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the ACRA Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified opinion.

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial StatementsIndependent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 20172019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In addition to the matter described in the “Basis for qualified opinion” section, we have determined the matter described below to be the key audit matter to be communicated in our report.

 

   December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 

Assets

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $142,503  $150,293 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   7,985   1,483 

Deferred tax assets

   —     214 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   150,488   151,990 

Long-term assets:

   

Property and equipment, net

   27,334   8,607 

Deferred tax assets

   —     560 

Restricted cash

   3,610   3,601 

Other assets

   411   53 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total long-term assets

   31,355   12,821 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $181,843  $164,811 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities, Series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity

   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $7,598  $4,943 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   8,898   4,434 

Current portion of capital lease obligation

   16   62 

Current portion of deferred rent

   60   —   

Current portion of deferred revenue

   2,705   2,705 

Current portion of lease incentive obligation

   344   11 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   19,621   12,155 

Long-term liabilities:

   

Capital lease obligation, net of current portion

   —     16 

Deferred rent, net of current portion

   4,214   680 

Deferred revenue, net of current portion

   5,607   8,311 

Lease incentive obligation, net of current portion

   3,094   116 

Other liabilities

   1,619   796 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total long-term liabilities

   14,534   9,919 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $34,155  $22,074 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Series A preferred shares, no par value; 3,901,348 shares issued and outstanding

  $7,874  $7,874 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity:

   

Ordinary shares, no par value; 27,829,079 and 23,502,169 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

   310,038   215,602 

Additionalpaid-in capital

   22,172   10,029 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   116   (291

Accumulated deficit

   (192,512  (90,477
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   139,814   134,863 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities, Series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity

  $181,843  $164,811 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part ofRevenue recognition under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement

Refer to Note 5 Collaboration Agreements and the accounting policy note on revenue recognition in the consolidated financial statements.statements

The key audit matterHow the matter was addressed in our audit

In May 2016, the Group entered into a Research, License and Option Agreement (the “Pfizer Collaboration Agreement”) with Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”). Under the agreement, the Group and Pfizer agreed to collaborate on up to five Pfizer programs over a four-year research term. The target nomination period for Pfizer to identify the five Pfizer programs (“targets”) was eighteen months ended November 5, 2017, which was subsequently extended to May 5, 2018. Pfizer nominated all five targets during the research term which ends in May 2020.

In May 2016, Pfizer paid the Group an upfront license fee payment amounting to $10.0 million. In the same month, the Company closed the Pfizer Equity Agreement and received cash proceeds of $30.0 million. The Company did not incur any material costs in connection with the issuance of shares.

Management identified five distinct performance obligations in the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement in accordance with ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Revenue of $7.1 million (December 31, 2018: $4.9 million; December 31, 2017: $3.9 million) has been recognized for the year ended December 31, 2019. The amounts received prior to satisfaction of revenue criteria of $1.5 million have been recorded as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2019.

Our audit procedures include:

•  Assessing whether the revenue recognized for Pfizer Collaboration Agreement is in accordance with our understanding of the transactions and the requirements of ASC 606Revenue from Contracts with Customers,which involves (i) identification of performance obligations; (ii) determination of allocation consideration; and, (iii) period of recognition.

•  Understanding and assessing management’s process of setting and developing the estimated period over which the research and development services are fulfilled, including management’s process to adjust the estimates for changes during the research and development period.

•  Performing management enquiries and corroborating, and reading project minutes to identify program changes impacting the timeline.

•  Independentlyre-computing the revenue to be recognized and deferred as at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial StatementsIndependent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 20172019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except shareThere is significant judgment in assessing the deliverables of the arrangement with Pfizer; (i) whether these deliverables are separate performance obligations; (ii) determination of the transaction value to be allocated for each performance obligation; and, per share amounts)(iii) the period over which revenue is recognized.

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 

Revenue

  $3,704  $1,485  $152 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

    

Research and development

   79,309   40,818   9,057 

General and administrative

   26,975   15,994   10,393 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   106,284   56,812   19,450 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss from operations

   (102,580  (55,327  (19,298

Other income (expense), net:

    

Dividend income

   1,578   255   —   

Interest income (expense), net

   6   337   86 

Other income (expense), net

   (331  (50  56 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other income (expense), net

   1,253   542   142 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

   (101,327  (54,785  (19,156

Income tax provision

   (708  (616  (44
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(102,035 $(55,401 $(19,200
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders—basic and diluted

  $(3.85 $(2.43 $(1.83
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted-average ordinary shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders—basic and diluted

   26,513,382   22,800,628   10,501,455 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notesThese are an integral partkey focus areas of our audit.

Findings:

We found the assessment of the deliverables in the arrangement, the allocation of the transaction value to each performance obligation, and the revenue recognition period to be reasonable.

Revenue recognition under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement

Refer to Note 5 Collaboration Agreements and the accounting policy note on revenue recognition in the consolidated financial statements.statements

The key audit matterHow the matter was addressed in our audit
In February 2018, the Group’s subsidiaries namely, Wave Life Sciences USA, Inc. (“Wave USA”) and Wave Life Sciences UK Limited (“Wave UK”) entered into a global strategic collaboration (the “Takeda Collaboration”) with Takeda Pharmaceutical Group Limited (“Takeda”). Under the agreement, Wave USA, Wave UK and Takeda agreed to collaborate on the research, development and commercialization of oligonucleotide therapeutics for disorders of the Central Nervous System (“CNS”). The Takeda Collaboration provides the Group with at least $230.0 million in committed cash and the option for Takeda toco-develop andco-commercialize the Group’s CNS development programs in (1) Huntington’s disease (“HD”); (2) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (“ALS”) and Frontotemporal dementia (“FTD”); and (3) the Group’s discovery-stage program targeting ATXN3 for the treatment of spinocerebellar ataxia 3 (“SCA3”) (collectively, “Category 1 Programs”). In addition, Takeda will have the right to exclusively license multiple preclinical programs for CNS disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease (collectively, “Category 2 Programs”).

Our audit procedures include:

•  Assessing whether the revenue recognized for Takeda Collaboration Agreement is in accordance with our understanding of the transactions and the requirements of ASC 606Revenue from Contracts with Customers,which involves (i) identification of performance obligations; (ii) determination of allocation consideration; and, (iii) period of recognition.

In assessing the critical accounting estimates associated with allocation consideration to those performance obligations, reviewed the relevant third party studies that form some of the inputs to management models and engaged KPMG specialist to review third party discount rates used by management.

•  Understanding and assessing management’s process of setting and developing the estimated period over which the research and development services are fulfilled, including management’s process to adjust the estimates for changes during the research and development period.

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial StatementsIndependent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 20172019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except shareSimultaneously with Wave USA’s and Wave UK’s entry into the Takeda Collaboration, the Company entered into Share Purchase Agreement (the “Takeda Equity Agreement”), and together with the Takeda Collaboration, pursuant to which it agreed to sell to Takeda 1,096,892 ordinary shares at a purchase price of $54.70 per share amounts)ordinary share.

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 

Net loss

  $(102,035 $(55,401 $(19,200

Other comprehensive loss:

    

Foreign currency translation

   407   (332  (15
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

  $(101,628 $(55,733 $(19,215
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes areIn April 2018, Takeda paid the Group an integral partupfront amount of $110.0 million. Takeda also agreed to fund $60.0 million during the four-year research term of the consolidated financial statements.

Group’s research and preclinical activities and to reimburse for any collaboration-budgeted research and preclinical expenses incurred by the Group which exceed that amount. In the same month, the Company closed the Takeda Equity Agreement and received cash proceeds of $60.0 million. The Company did not incur any material costs in connection with the issuance of shares.

Management identified seven distinct performance obligations in the Takeda Collaboration in accordance with ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Revenue of $8.8 million (December 31, 2018: $9.6 million) has been recognized for the year ended December 31, 2019. The amounts received prior to satisfaction of revenue criteria of $151.6 million have been recorded as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2019.

There is significant judgment in assessing the deliverables of the arrangement with Takeda; (i) whether these deliverables are separate performance obligations; (ii) determination of the transaction value to be allocated for each performance obligation; and, (iii) the period over which revenue is recognized. In addition, there is judgment involved in determining the fair value of the ordinary shares issued to Takeda under the Takeda Equity Agreement. These are key focus areas of our audit.

•  Performing management enquiries and corroborating and reading project minutes to identify program changes impacting the timeline.

•  Independentlyre-computing the revenue and deferred revenue amounts as at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

•  Validating the fair value used for the purchase of the Company’s ordinary shares and that the agreement does not include share adjustment features beyond the standard anti-dilution.

Findings:

We found the assessment of the deliverables in the arrangement, the allocation of the transaction value to each performance obligation, and the revenue recognition period to be reasonable.

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial StatementsIndependent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 20172019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SERIES A PREFERRED SHARES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 

  Series A
Preferred Shares
  Series B
Preferred Shares
  Series A
Preferred Shares
  Ordinary Shares  Additional
Paid-In-
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount     

Balance as of December 31, 2014

  —    $—     —    $—     3,901,348  $7,874   4,263,472  $9,973  $—    $56  $(15,876 $2,027 

Issuance of ordinary shares, net of issuance costs of $169

  —     —     —     —     —     —     4,769,077   11,631   —     —     —     11,631 

Share-based compensation

  —     —     —     —     —     —     190,856   842   3,182   —     —     4,024 

Issuance of Series B preferred, net of issuance costs of $3,468

  —     —     5,334,892   62,532   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Reclassification of Series A preferred shares

  3,901,348   7,874   —     —     (3,901,348  (7,874  —     —     —     —     —     (7,874

Issuance of ordinary shares upon initial public offering, net of issuance costs of $3,702

  —     —     —     —     —     —     6,993,126   100,366   —     —     —     100,366 

Conversion of Series B preferred shares into ordinary shares upon initial public offering

  —     —     (5,334,892  (62,532  —     —     5,334,892   62,532   —     —     —     62,532 

Other comprehensive loss

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (15  —     (15

Net loss

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (19,200  (19,200
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

  3,901,348  $7,874   —    $—     —    $—     21,551,423  $185,344  $3,182  $41  $(35,076 $153,491 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Issuance of ordinary shares

  —     —     —     —     —     —     1,875,000   30,000   —     —     —     30,000 

Share-based compensation

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     6,847   —     —     6,847 

Option exercises

  —     —     —     —     —     —     75,746   258   —     —     —     258 

Other comprehensive loss

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (332  —     (332

Net loss

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (55,401  (55,401
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

  3,901,348  $7,874   —    $—     —    $—     23,502,169  $215,602  $10,029  $(291 $(90,477 $134,863 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Issuance of ordinary shares, net of issuance costs of $491

  —     —     —     —     —     —     4,166,667   93,509   —     —     —     93,509 

Share-based compensation

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     12,143   —     —     12,143 

Vesting of RSUs

  —     —     —     —     —     —     22,750   —     —     —     —     —   

Option exercises

  —     —     —     —     —     —     137,493   927   —     —     —     927 

Other comprehensive loss

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     407   —     407 

Net loss

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (102,035  (102,035
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  3,901,348  $7,874   —    $—     —    $—     27,829,079  $310,038  $22,172  $116  $(192,512 $139,814 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

The above key audit matter applies to both the consolidated financial statements and the supplementary balance sheet.

Other information

Management is responsible for the other information contained in the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements. Other information is defined as all information in the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements other than the financial statements and our auditors’ report thereon. We have obtained all other information prior to the date of this auditors’ report.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Responsibilities of management and directors for the financial statements

Management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the provisions of the Act and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for devising and maintaining a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide a reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorised use or disposition; and transactions are properly authorised and that they are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of true and fair financial statements and to maintain accountability of assets.

In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for evaluating whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.

The directors’ responsibilities include overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.

Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SSAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SSAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial StatementsIndependent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 20172019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 

Cash flows from operating activities

   

Net loss

 $(102,035 $(55,401 $(19,200

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows used in operating activities:

   

Amortization of lease incentive obligation

  (208  —     —   

Depreciation and amortization

  2,155   784   594 

Share-based compensation expense

  12,143   6,847   4,024 

Deferred rent

  3,594   565   88 

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

  205   —     —   

Deferred income taxes

  774   (564  36 

Tax benefit related to share-based compensation

  —     (310  —   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  (6,502  (1,337  130 

Othernon-current assets

  (358  —     —   

Accounts payable

  3,892   3,369   1,648 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  4,550   2,296   267 

Deferred revenue

  (2,704  11,015   (152

Othernon-current liabilities

  823   864   38 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

  (83,671  (31,872  (12,527
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

   

Increase in restricted cash

  (9  (2,599  (1,055

Proceeds from government grant reimbursements for property and equipment

  —     —     3 

Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment

  —     4   —   

Purchases of property and equipment

  (18,887  (5,567  (1,857
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (18,896  (8,162  (2,909
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

   

Proceeds from initial public offering, net of offering costs and underwriter commissions

  —     —     101,444 

Costs associated with initial public offering

   (1,075  —   

Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares, net of offering costs

  93,509   30,000   11,631 

Proceeds from issuance of Series B preferred shares, net of offering costs

  —     —     62,532 

Proceeds from government grant

  —     —     112 

Payments on capital lease obligation

  (62  (62  (126

Proceeds from the exercise of share options

  927   258   —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  94,374   29,121   175,593 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash

  403   (14  15 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (7,790  (10,927  160,172 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  150,293   161,220   1,048 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $142,503  $150,293  $161,220 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

   

Deferred offering costs in accounts payable and accrued expenses at period end

 $—    $—    $1,075 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 $37  $29  $—   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash paid for taxes, net of refunds

 $(11 $554  $—   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Equipment acquired for capital lease obligation

 $—    $—    $268 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Property and equipment purchases in accounts payable and accrued expenses at period end

 $339  $1,653  $306 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tenant improvements paid for by the landlord during the period

 $2,774  $128  $—   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tenant improvements to be reimbursed by the landlord

 $745  $—    $—   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The accompanying notes are an integral partrisk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the consolidated financial statements.override of internal controls.

Obtain an understanding of internal controls relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls.

Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditors’ report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditors’ report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Company to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the company audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal controls that we identify during our audit.

We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with the directors, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditors’ report unless the law or regulations preclude public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial StatementsIndependent Auditors’ Report

Year ended December 31, 20172019

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. THE COMPANY

Organization

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (together with its subsidiaries, “Wave” or the “Company”) is a biotechnology company with an innovative and proprietary synthetic chemistry drug development platform that the Company is using to rationally design, develop and commercialize a broad pipeline offirst-in-class orbest-in-class nucleic acid therapeutic candidates for genetically defined diseases. Nucleic acid therapeutics are a growing and innovative class of drugs that have the potential to address diseases that have historically been difficult to treat with small molecule drugs or biologics. Nucleic acid therapeutics, or oligonucleotides, are comprised of a sequence of nucleotides that are linked together by a backbone of chemical bonds. The Company is initially developing oligonucleotides that target genetic defects to either reduce the expression of disease-promoting proteins or transform the production of dysfunctional mutant proteins into the production of functional proteins.

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

In our opinion, the accounting and other records required by the Act to be kept by the Parent have been properly kept in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditors’ report is Malcolm Ramsay.

/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

Public Accountants and

Chartered Accountants

Singapore

April 28, 2020

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

   December 31,
2019
  December 31,
2018
 

Assets

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $147,161  $174,819 

Current portion of accounts receivable

   20,000   10,000 

Prepaid expenses

   9,626   6,587 

Other current assets

   8,689   10,867 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   185,476   202,273 

Long-term assets:

   

Accounts receivable, net of current portion

   30,000   50,000 

Property and equipment, net

   36,368   39,931 

Operating leaseright-of-use assets

   18,101   —   

Restricted cash

   3,647   3,625 

Other assets

   10,658   111 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total long-term assets

   98,774   93,667 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $284,250  $295,940 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities, Series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity

   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $9,073  $13,089 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   16,185   14,736 

Current portion of deferred rent

   —     115 

Current portion of deferred revenue

   89,652   100,945 

Current portion of lease incentive obligation

   —     1,156 

Current portion of operating lease liability

   3,243   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   118,153   130,041 

Long-term liabilities:

   

Deferred rent, net of current portion

   —     5,132 

Deferred revenue, net of current portion

   63,466   68,156 

Lease incentive obligation, net of current portion

   —     9,247 

Operating lease liability, net of current portion

   29,304   —   

Other liabilities

   1,721   2,142 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total long-term liabilities

   94,491   84,677 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $212,644  $214,718 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Series A preferred shares, no par value; 3,901,348 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018

  $7,874  $7,874 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity:

   

Ordinary shares, no par value; 34,340,690 and 29,472,197 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively

   539,547   375,148 

Additionalpaid-in capital

   57,277   37,768 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   267   153 

Accumulated deficit

   (533,359  (339,721
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   63,732   73,348 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities, Series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity

  $284,250  $295,940 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2019  2018  2017 

Revenue

  $15,983  $14,414  $3,893 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

    

Research and development

   175,431   134,428   79,309 

General and administrative

   48,869   39,509   26,975 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   224,300   173,937   106,284 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss from operations

   (208,317  (159,523  (102,391

Other income, net:

    

Dividend income

   4,912   3,368   1,578 

Interest income, net

   29   22   6 

Other income (expense), net

   9,738   9,549   (331
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other income, net

   14,679   12,939   1,253 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

   (193,638  (146,584  (101,138

Income tax provision

   —     (69  (842
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(193,638 $(146,653 $(101,980
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders—basic and diluted

  $(5.72 $(5.06 $(3.85
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted-average ordinary shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders—basic and diluted

   33,866,487   28,970,404   26,513,382 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Net loss

  $(193,638 $(146,653 $(101,980

Foreign currency translation

   114   37   407 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

   (193,524  (146,616  (101,573
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SERIES A PREFERRED SHARES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share amounts)

  Series A
Preferred Shares
     Ordinary Shares  Additional
Paid-In-
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 
  Shares   Amount     Shares  Amount 

Balance at December 31, 2016

  3,901,348   $7,874     23,502,169  $215,602  $10,029  $(291 $(90,736 $134,604 

Issuance of ordinary shares, net of issuance costs of $491

  —      —       4,166,667   93,509   —     —     —     93,509 

Share-based compensation

  —      —       —     —     12,143   —     —     12,143 

Vesting of RSUs

  —      —       22,750   —     —     —     —     —   

Option exercises

  —      —       137,493   927   —     —     —     927 

Other comprehensive income

  —      —       —     —     —     407   —     407 

Net loss

  —      —       —     —     —     —     (101,980  (101,980
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  3,901,348   $7,874     27,829,079  $310,038  $22,172  $116  $(192,716 $139,610 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Issuance of ordinary shares

  —      —       1,096,892   60,000   —     —     —     60,000 

Share-based compensation

  —      —       —     —     15,596   —     —     15,596 

Vesting of RSUs

  —      —       38,594   —     —     —     —     —   

Option exercises

  —      —       507,632   5,110   —     —     —     5,110 

Impact of adoption of ASU2016-16

  —      —       —     —     —     —     (352  (352

Other comprehensive income

  —      —       —     —     —     37   —     37 

Net loss

  —      —       —     —     —     —     (146,653  (146,653
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

  3,901,348   $7,874     29,472,197  $375,148  $37,768  $153  $(339,721 $73,348 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Issuance of ordinary shares

  —      —       4,542,500   161,792   —     —     —     161,792 

Share-based compensation

  —      —       —     —     19,509   —     —     19,509 

Vesting of RSUs

  —      —       112,437   —     —     —     —     —   

Option exercises

  —      —       213,556   2,607   —     —     —     2,607 

Other comprehensive income

  —      —       —     —     —     114   —     114 

Net loss

  —      —       —     —     —     —     (193,638  (193,638
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

  3,901,348   $7,874     34,340,690  $539,547  $57,277  $267  $(533,359 $63,732 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2019  2018  2017 

Cash flows from operating activities

    

Net loss

  $(193,638 $(146,653 $(101,980

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

    

Amortization of lease incentive obligation

   —     (790  (208

Amortization ofright-of-use assets

   1,613   —     —   

Depreciation of property and equipment

   7,588   5,581   2,155 

Share-based compensation expense

   19,509   15,596   12,143 

Net loss on disposal of property and equipment

   —     44   205 

Deferred rent

   —     973   3,594 

Deferred income taxes

   —     —     908 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

   10,000   (59,000  (1,000

Prepaid expenses

   (3,665  (1,831  (3,429

Other assets

   (8,369  (8,690  (2,431

Accounts payable

   (3,497  4,936   3,892 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   1,448   5,864   4,550 

Deferred revenue

   (15,983  160,585   (2,893

Operating lease liabilities

   (2,816  —     —   

Othernon-current liabilities

   (421  523   823 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

   (188,231  (22,862  (83,671
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

    

Purchases of property and equipment, net of tenant improvement allowances

   (3,918  (9,938  (18,887
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (3,918  (9,938  (18,887
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

    

Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares, net of offering costs

   161,792   60,000   93,509 

Payments on capital lease obligation

   —     (16  (62

Proceeds from the exercise of share options

   2,607   5,110   927 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   164,399   65,094   94,374 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash

   114   37   403 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   (27,636  32,331   (7,781

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period

   178,444   146,113   153,894 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period

  $150,808  $178,444  $146,113 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. THE COMPANY

Organization

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (together with its subsidiaries, “Wave” or the “Company”) is a clinical-stage genetic medicines company committed to delivering life-changing treatments for people battling devastating diseases. PRISM, Wave’s proprietary discovery and drug development platform, enables Wave to target genetically defined diseases with stereopure oligonucleotides across multiple therapeutic modalities.

The Company was incorporated in Singapore on July 23, 2012 and has its principal U.S. office in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Company was incorporated with the purpose of combining two commonly held companies, Wave Life Sciences USA, Inc. (“Wave USA”), a Delaware corporation (formerly Ontorii, Inc.), and Wave Life Sciences Japan, Inc. (“Wave Japan”), a company organized under the laws of Japan (formerly Chiralgen., Ltd.), which occurred on September 13, 2012. On May 31, 2016, Wave Life Sciences Ireland Limited (“Wave Ireland”) was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. On April 3, 2017, Wave Life Sciences UK Limited (“Wave UK”) was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

The Company’s primary activities since inception have been developing PRISM to design, develop and commercialize oligonucleotide therapeutics, advancing the Company’s CNS business, building the Company’s research and development activities in Singapore on July 23, 2012 and has its principal U.S. office in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Company was incorporated with the purpose of combining two commonly held companies, Wave Life Sciences USA, Inc. (“Wave USA”), a Delaware corporation (formerly Ontorii, Inc.), and Wave Life Sciences Japan, Inc. (“Wave Japan”), a company organized under the laws of Japan (formerly Chiralgen., Ltd.), which occurred on September 13, 2012. On May 31, 2016, Wave Life Sciences Ireland Limited (“Wave Ireland”) was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. On April 3, 2017, Wave Life Sciences UK Limited (“Wave UK”) was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

The Company’s primary activities since inception have been developing an innovative and proprietary synthetic chemistry drug development platform to design, develop and commercialize nucleic acid therapeutic programs, advancing the Company’s neurology franchise, expanding the Company’s research and development activities into additional therapeutic areas including ophthalmology and hepatic, advancing programs into the clinic, furthering clinical development of such clinical-stage programs, building the Company’s intellectual property, recruiting personnel and assuring adequate capital to support these activities.

Liquidity

Since its inception, the Company has not generated any product revenue and has incurred recurring net losses. To date, the Company has primarily funded its operations through private placements of debt and equity securities, public offerings of its ordinary shares and collaborations with third parties. Until the Company can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, the Company expects to continue to finance operations through a combination of public or private equity or debt financings or other sources, which may include collaborations with third parties. Adequate additional financing may not be available to the Company on acceptable terms, or at all. The inability to raise capital as and when needed would have a negative impact on the Company’s financial condition and ability to pursue its business strategy.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $147.2 million. The Company expects that its existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund its operations for at least the next twelve months. The Company has based this expectation on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, and the Company may use its available capital resources sooner than it currently expects. If the Company’s anticipated operating results are not achieved in future periods, planned expenditures may need to be further reduced in order to extend the time period over which the then-available resources would be able to fund the Company’s operations. In addition, the Company may elect to raise additional funds before it needs them if the conditions for raising capital are favorable due to market conditions or strategic considerations, even if the Company expects it has sufficient funds for its current or future operating plans.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company is subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology industry including, but not limited to, new technological innovations, protection of proprietary technology, developingmaintaining internal manufacturing capabilities, dependence on key personnel, compliance with government regulations and the need to obtain additional financing. The Company’s therapeutic programs will require significant additional research and development efforts, including extensive preclinical and clinical testing and regulatory approval, prior to commercialization of any product candidates. These efforts require significant amounts of additional capital, adequate personnel infrastructure and extensive compliance-reporting capabilities. There can be no assurance that the Company’s research and development efforts will be successfully completed,successful, that adequate protection for the Company’s intellectual property will be obtained, that any products developed will obtain necessary government regulatory approval or that any approved products will be commercially viable. Even if the Company’s product development efforts are successful, it is uncertain when, if ever, the Company will generate significant revenue from product sales. The Company operates in an environment of rapid change in technology and substantial competition from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. In addition, the Company is dependent upon the services of its employees and consultants.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

The Company has never been profitable, and since its inception has incurred recurring operating losses. The Company expects to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. To date, the Company has primarily funded its operations through private placements of debt and equity securities, public offerings of its ordinary shares and collaborations with third parties. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has received an aggregate of approximately $323.2 million in net proceeds from these transactions. The Company received $89.3 million in net proceeds from private placements of its debt and equity securities, $100.4 million in net proceeds ($111.9 million gross proceeds) from its initial public offering, inclusive of the over-allotment exercise, $40.0 million under the Pfizer Agreements, including $10.0 million as an upfront payment under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement and $30.0 million in the form of an equity investment, and $93.5 million in net proceeds ($100.0 million gross proceeds) from its April 2017follow-on underwritten public offering.

Basis of Presentation

The Company has prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and in U.S. dollars.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original final maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are comprised of funds in money market accounts.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in these consolidated financial statements include the valuation of the Company’s Series A preferred shares on conversion of the related party notes payable, the valuation of the Company’s ordinary shares prior to the initial public offering in November 2015, the assumptions used to determine the fair value of share-based awards, the periodCompany’s revenue recognition policy, particularly, (a) assessing the number of performance obligations; (b) determining the transaction price; (c) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (d) determining the pattern over which revenue is recognized under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement (as defined in Note 5),performance obligations are satisfied, including estimates to complete performance obligations, the evaluation of progress to completion of external research and development costs which can result in prepaid or accrued expenses related to the Company’s contract research organizations (“CROs”) and contract manufacturing organizations and(“CMOs”), the valuation allowance required for the Company’s deferred tax assets, and determining uncertain tax positions and the related liabilities.liabilities, and estimating refundable tax credits. Estimates are periodically reviewed in light of changes in circumstances, facts and experience. Actual results could differ from the Company’s estimates.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

Reclassifications

The Company has reclassified certain prior period financial statement amounts to conform to its current period presentation. These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations of prior periods.

Segment Data

The Company manages its operations as a single segment for the purposes of assessing performance and making operating decisions. The Company’s singular focus is on developing its proprietary synthetic chemistrydiscovery and drug development platform, PRISM, to develop and commercialize a broad pipeline of nucleic acid-based therapeutics.therapeutics, or oligonucleotides.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its SubsidiariesGoing Concern

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

At each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The Company is required to make certain additional disclosures if it concludes substantial doubt exists and it is not alleviated by the Company’s plans or when its plans alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s evaluation entails analyzing prospective operating budgets and forecasts for expectations of the Company’s cash needs and comparing those needs to the current cash and cash equivalent balance.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency is the U.S. dollar for all of the Company’s entities aside from Wave Japan, which has the Japanese Yen as its functional currency. Assets and liabilities of Wave Japan are translated at period end exchange rates while revenues and expenses of Wave Japan are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Prior to 2017, Wave Japan had intercompany loans payable to Wave that were not expected to be settled in the foreseeable future which were therefore translated at the historical rate for the date of each capital transaction. In 2017, Wave Japan repaid the intercompany loans which resulted in a foreign exchange loss which is included in the consolidated statements of operations within other income (expense), net. Net unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translation are reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) income within the consolidated statements of Series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss within other income (expenses)(expense), net.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company is required to disclose information on all assets and liabilities reported at fair value that enables an assessment of the inputs used in determining the reported fair values. The fair value hierarchy is a hierarchy of inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the financial instrument based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the financial instrument and are developed based on the information available in the circumstances. The fair value hierarchy applies only to the valuation inputs used in determining the reported fair value of the investments and is not a measure of the investment credit quality. The hierarchy defines three levels of valuation inputs:

Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date of identical, unrestricted assets.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 includes investments valued at quoted prices adjusted for legal or contractual restrictions specific to the security.

Level 3—Pricing inputs are unobservable for the asset, that is, inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset. Level 3 includes private investments that are supported by little or no market activity.

Cash, and cash equivalents and restricted cash are Level 1 assets which are comprised of funds held in readily available checking and money market accounts. Cash, and cash equivalents and restricted cash were recorded at fair value as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, totaling $142.5$150.8 million and $150.3$178.4 million, respectively. The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities. Accounts receivable relate to the Company’s collaboration agreements.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk. The Company uses several financial institutions to maintain its cash and cash equivalents, all of which are high quality, accredited financial institutions and, accordingly, such funds are subject to minimal credit risk. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held. The Company has no financial instruments withoff-balance sheet risk of loss.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists primarily of cash placed in separate restricted bank accounts as required under the terms of the Company’s lease agreements for its Cambridge, Massachusetts and Lexington, Massachusetts facilities (refer to Note 8). As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company had $3.6 million of restricted cash, of which $2.6 million related to the Lexington facility and the remaining $1.0 million related to the Cambridge facility.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, which consists primarily of equipment, furniture, and equipmentsoftware and leasehold improvements, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives of the assets:

 

Equipment, Furniture and Software

  

3-7 years

Leasehold Improvements

  

Shorter of asset life ofor lease or useful lifeterm

Depreciation and amortization begins at the time the asset is placed in service. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of the disposed asset and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets consist of property and equipment. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or other changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Certain factors

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

may exist or events may occur that indicate that impairment exists including, but not limited to, the following: significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results; significant changes in the manner of use of the underlying assets; and significant adverse industry or market economic trends.

When performing the impairment assessment for long-lived assets, the Company compares the carrying value of such assets to the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. In the event that the carrying value of the assets is determined to be unrecoverable, the Company would estimate the fair value of the assets and record an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying value over the fair value.

Through December 31, 2017, the Company has not recognized any impairment charges.

Revenue Recognition

As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s only significant source of revenue is derived from the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement (as defined in Note 5), pursuant to whichEffective January 1, 2018, the Company and Pfizer (as defined in Note 5) have agreed to collaborate on the discovery, development and commercialization of stereopure oligonucleotide therapeutics for the Pfizer Programs (as defined in Note 5), each directed at a genetically-defined hepatic target selected by Pfizer. The Company entered into the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement in May 2016.

The Company presents revenue from the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”),adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC

606”), using the full retrospective transition method. As a result of adopting ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, the Company revised its comparative financial statements for the prior year as if ASC 606 had been effective for that period. As a result, the following financial statement line items were affected as of December 31, 2017 and for the year then ended.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   As of December 31, 2017 
   As revised
under ASC 606
   As originally reported
under ASC 605
   Effect of change 
   (in thousands) 

Current portion of deferred revenue

  $1,275   $2,705   $(1,430

Deferred revenue, net of current portion

   7,241    5,607    1,634 

Accumulated deficit

   (192,716   (192,512   (204

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

   For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 
   As revised
under ASC 606
   As originally reported
under ASC 605
   Effect of change 
   (in thousands, except per share data) 

Revenue

  $3,893   $3,704   $189 

Loss from operations

   (102,391   (102,580   189 

Income tax provision

   (842   (708   (134

Net loss

   (101,980   (102,035   55 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

   For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 
   As revised
under ASC 606
  As originally reported
under ASC 605
  Effect of change 
   (in thousands) 

Net loss

  $(101,980 $(102,035 $55 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:

    

Deferred income taxes

   908   774   134 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Deferred revenue

   (2,893  (2,704  (189

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

808”). In addition,Under ASC 605, the Company recognizeswas recognizing the revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”). Accordingly, revenue is recognized forallocated to each unit of accounting when allon a straight-line basis over the period the Company is expected to complete its obligations. Under ASC 606, the Company is recognizing the revenue allocated to each performance obligation over time, measuring progress using an input method over the period the Company is expected to complete each performance obligation.

Under ASC 605, the Company recognized revenue related to milestone payments as the milestone was achieved, using the milestone method. Under ASC 606, the Company performs an assessment of the following criteriaprobability of milestone achievement at each reporting date and determines whether the cumulative revenue related to the milestone is at risk of significant reversal.

This standard applies to all contracts with customers, except for contracts that are met:

persuasive evidencewithin the scope of other standards, such as leases, insurance, and financial instruments. Under ASC 606, an arrangement exists;

delivery has occurredentity recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, have been rendered;

in an amount that reflects the seller’sconsideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the entity performs the following five-step analysis: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the buyerperformance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step analysis to contracts when it is fixedprobable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it is entitled in exchange for the goods or determinable;services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract, determines those that are performance obligations, and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.

The Company has entered into collaboration agreements for research, development, and commercial services, under which the Company licenses certain rights to its product candidates to third parties. The terms of these arrangements typically include payment to the Company of one or more of the following:non-refundable, upfront license fees; reimbursement of certain costs; customer option exercise fees; development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments; and royalties on net sales of licensed products. Any variable consideration is constrained and, therefore, the cumulative revenue associated with this consideration is not recognized until it is deemed not to be at significant risk of reversal.

In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as the Company fulfills its obligations under each of its agreements for which the collaboration partner is also a customer, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation. As part of the accounting for these arrangements, the Company must use significant judgment to determine: (a) the number of performance obligations based on the determination under step (ii) above; (b) the transaction price under step (iii) above; and (c) the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations as a measure of progress in step (v) above. The Company uses significant judgment to determine whether milestones or other variable consideration, except for royalties, should be included in the transaction price as described further below. The transaction price is allocated to the optional goods and services the Company expects to provide. The Company uses estimates to determine the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

collectability is reasonably assured.

Amounts received prior to satisfying thebeing recognized as revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue. Amounts expected to be recognized as revenue within the 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as current portion of deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts not expected to be recognized as revenue within the 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as deferred revenue, net of current portion.

Pursuant to the accounting guidance in ASC605-25, the Company evaluatesmultiple-element arrangements to determine (1) the deliverables included in the arrangement and (2)Licenses of intellectual property: In assessing whether the individual deliverables represent separate units of accountinga promise or whether they must be accounted for as a combined unit of accounting. This evaluation involves subjective determinations and requires the Company to make judgments about the individual deliverables and whether such deliverables are separableperformance obligation is distinct from the other aspects of the contractual relationship. Deliverables are considered separate units of accounting provided that the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis and, if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in the Company’s control. In assessing whether an item has standalone value,promises, the Company considers factors such as the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization capabilities of the collaboration partnercustomer and the availability of the associated expertise in the general marketplace. In addition, the Company considers whether the collaboration partnercustomer can usebenefit from a deliverablepromise for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining deliverable,promise, whether the value of the deliverablepromise is dependent on the undelivered item andunsatisfied promise, whether there are other vendors that cancould provide the undelivered items.

Underremaining promise, and whether it is separately identifiable from the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement,remaining promise. For licenses that are combined with other promises, the Company utilizes judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, Pfizer agreedif over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

Research and development services: If an arrangement is determined to collaboratecontain a promise or obligation for the Company to perform research and development services, the Company must determine whether these services are distinct from other promises in the arrangement. In assessing whether the services are distinct from the other promises, the Company considers the capabilities of the customer to perform these same services. In addition, the Company considers whether the customer can benefit from a promise for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining promise, whether the value of the promise is dependent on the discovery,unsatisfied promise, whether there are other vendors that could provide the remaining promise, and whether it is separately identifiable from the remaining promise. For research and development and commercialization of upservices that are combined with other promises, the Company utilizes judgment to five Pfizer Programs, twoassess the nature of the five targets were declared upon initiationcombined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue. The Company evaluates the agreement in May 2016. The Pfizer Collaboration Agreement provides Pfizer with certainmeasure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

Customer options:If an arrangement is determined to contain customer options that allow the customer to nominate up to three remaining programsacquire additional goods or services, the goods and services underlying the Company is required to consider whether suchcustomer options are substantive. Options arenot considered substantive if,to be performance obligations at the inceptionoutset of the arrangement, as they are contingent upon option exercise. The Company evaluates the customer options for material rights, that is, the option to acquire additional goods or services for free or at a discount. If the customer options are determined to represent a material right, the material right is recognized as a separate performance obligation at the outset of the arrangement. The Company is at risk asallocates the transaction price to whethermaterial rights based on the collaboration partner will choosestandalone selling price. As a practical alternative to exerciseestimating the option. Factors thatstandalone selling price when the Company considers in evaluating whether an option is substantive include whether the optional elementsgoods or services are essentialboth (i) similar to the functionality of other programs nominated, whether economic factors compel Pfizer to purchaseoriginal goods and services in the optional elements, the cost to exercise the option, the overall objective of the arrangementcontract and the benefit Pfizer might obtain from the arrangement without exercising the option. In August 2016, Pfizer nominated the third hepatic target under the Collaboration and pursuant to(ii) provided in accordance with the terms of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, Pfizer had the option to nominate two additional targets by November 5, 2017. On November 5, 2017,original contract, the Company amended its Pfizer Collaboration Agreementallocates the total amount of consideration expected to extendbe received from the target nomination period from November 5, 2017customer to May 5, 2018. This amendment provides Pfizer with an additional six monthsthe total goods or services expected to nominatebe provided to the two remaining hepatic targets under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement.

When an option is considered substantive and there is no significant incremental discount,customer. Amounts allocated to any material right are not recognized as revenue until the option is not consideredexercised and the performance obligation is satisfied.

Milestone payments: At the inception of each arrangement that includes milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether a deliverablesignificant reversal of cumulative revenue provided in conjunction with achieving the arrangement and no consideration is allocated to it. Conversely, when an option is

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

��

milestones is probable, and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered substantive or it is considered substantive but is priced at an incremental discount, it is analyzed to determine if it should be combined withprobable of being achieved until those approvals are received. For other deliverables inmilestones, the arrangement. Options that are substantive and priced at a significant and incremental discount are further assessed to determine whether a portion of the upfront payment should be allocated to the option and other deliverables in the arrangement.

At the inception of an arrangement that includes milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether each milestone is substantive and at risk to both parties on the basis of the contingent nature of the milestone. This evaluation includes an assessment of whether: (1) the consideration is commensurate with either the Company’s performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from its performance to achieve the milestone, (2) the consideration relates solely to past performance and (3) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial, and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the particular milestone and the level of effort and investment required to achieve the particular milestone in making this assessment. There is considerable judgment involved in determining whether it is probable that a milestone satisfiessignificant reversal of cumulative revenue would not occur. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company reevaluates the probability of achievement of all milestones subject to constraint and, if necessary, adjusts its estimate of the criteria required to concludeoverall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulativecatch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment.

Royalties: For arrangements that a milestone is substantive. Revenue from substantive milestones will be recognized in its entirety upon successful accomplishment of the milestone.

Aside from the program nomination payments, which relate to the options described above, the remaininginclude sales-based royalties, including milestone payments required underbased on a level of sales, and the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement are contingent uponlicense is deemed to be the Company’s performance underpredominant item to which the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, including in certain instances, regulatory approval. The Company views these milestones as substantive and has excluded the amounts as allocable consideration at the outset of the arrangement. All commercial milestones will be accounted for in the same manner as royalties and recorded as revenue upon achievement of the milestone, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

The Company recognizes arrangement consideration allocated to each unit of accounting when all of the revenue recognition criteria in ASC 605 are satisfied for that particular unit of accounting. In the event that a deliverable does not represent a separate unit of accounting,relate, the Company recognizes revenue fromat the combined unitlater of accounting over(i) when the Company’s contractualrelated sales occur, or estimated(ii) when the performance period for the undelivered elements,obligation to which is typically the termsome or all of the Company’s research and development obligations. If there is no discernible patternroyalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). To date, the Company has not recognized any royalty revenue resulting from any of performance or objectively measurable performance measures do not exist, thenits licensing arrangements.

Contract costs: The Company recognizes as an asset the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if the costs are expected to be recovered. As a practical expedient, the Company recognizes revenue under the arrangement onincremental costs of obtaining astraight-line basis over contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset that it otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. To date, the Company is expected to complete its performance obligations. Conversely, if the patternhas not incurred any incremental costs of performance in which the service is provided to the customer can be determined and objectively measurable performance measures exist, then the Company recognizes revenue under the arrangement using the proportional performance method.obtaining a contract with a customer.

For additional discussion of accounting for collaboration revenues, see Note 5.

Product Revenue recognized is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using thestraight-line method or proportional performance method, as applicable, as of the period ending date.

The Company has concluded thathad no product revenue to date.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred. External development costs are recognized based on an evaluation of the deliverables underprogress to completion of specific tasks. Payments for these activities are based on the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement relate primarily toterms of the individual agreements, which may differ from the pattern of costs incurred, and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as prepaid or accrued expenses.

License Agreements and Patent Costs

Costs associated with licenses of technology and patent costs are expensed as incurred and are generally included in research and development required byexpense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Refundable Tax Credits

The Company is eligible for refundable tax credits with tax authorities for certain qualified operating expenses. The Company recognizes refundable tax credits when there is reasonable assurance that the Company for eachwill comply with the requirements of the programs nominated by Pfizer. The remaining deliverables, including sample supplies provided by each party to fulfill its obligation as a licensee, participation on a joint steering committee to overseerefundable tax credit and that the research and development activities, and regulatory responsibilities related to filings and obtaining approvals related to the products that may result from each program do not represent separate units of accounting based on their dependence on the research and development efforts.refundable tax credit will be received.

Because there is no discernible pattern of performance given the nature of the research and development efforts, the Company recognizes the allocated revenue for each deliverable under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement on

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

a straight-line basis overRefundable tax credits are recorded as income and classified in other income (expense), net in the period the Company is expected to complete its performance obligations for each deliverable, or unitconsolidated statements of accounting. For the first two Pfizer Programs, this period is expected to be from the initiation date of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, which was May 5, 2016,operations and for the other Pfizer Programs, the period is expected to be from the date that work commences on those programs through the earlier of (a) the termination of the research and development performance obligations under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, which is May 5, 2020 (the “Research Term”), or (b) the estimated date the Company expects to meet its research and development performance obligations under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. Given the uncertainty as to when the research and development performance obligations will be completed, the Company has used the Research Term for purposes of applying the straight-line method for revenue recognition for the year ended December 31, 2017.comprehensive loss.

Product Revenue

The Company has had no product revenue to date.

Net Loss per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the sum of the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period and, if dilutive, the weighted-average number of potential ordinary shares, including the assumed exercise of share options.

The Company applies thetwo-class method to calculate its basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders, as its Series A preferred shares are participating securities. Thetwo-class method is an earnings allocation formula that treats a participating security as having rights to earnings that otherwise would have been available to ordinary shareholders. However, for the periods presented, thetwo-class method does not impact the net loss per ordinary share as the Company was in a net loss position for each of the periods presented and holders of Series A preferred shares do not participate in losses.

The Company’s Series A preferred shares contractually entitle the holders of such shares to participate in dividends but do not contractually require the holders of such shares to participate in losses of the Company. Accordingly, for periods in which the Company reports a net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders, diluted net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders is the same as basic net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders, since dilutive ordinary shares are not assumed to have been issued if their effect is anti-dilutive.

License Agreements and Patent Costs

Costs associated with licenses of technology and patent costs are expensed as incurred and are generally included in research and development expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company measures and recognizes share-based compensation expense, for both employee and director option awards, based on the grant date fair value of the awards. The Company calculates the fair value of restricted share unit awards based on the grant date fair value of the underlying ordinary shares. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

The Company determines the fair value of share-based awards granted tonon-employees as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. All issuances of equity instruments issued tonon-employees as consideration for goods or services received by the Company are accounted for based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. These awards are recorded in expense and additionalpaid-in capital in shareholders’ equity over the applicable service periods based on the fair value of the options at the end of each period. The Company accounts for the expense from share-based awards tonon-employees byre-measuring the awards at fair value over the vesting period.

The Company classifies share-based compensation expense in its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss in the same manner in which the award recipient’s payrollcompensation costs are classified or in which the award recipients’recipient’s service payments are classified.

Prior to the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”) in November 2015, the fair value of the ordinary shares underlying its share-based awards was estimated on each grant date by the board of directors. The board of directors determined the estimated per share fair value of the Company’s ordinary shares at various dates considering contemporaneous and retrospective valuations performed in accordance with the guidance outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Practice Aid,Valuation of Privately-Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation (“the Practice Aid”). After the closing of the Company’s IPO, the fair value of the ordinary shares underlying the Company’s share-based awards is based on the closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of grant.

The fair value of each share option grant was determined using the methods and assumptions discussed below. Each of theseThese inputs isare generally subjective and generally requiresrequire significant judgment and estimation by management.

 

  

Fair Value of Ordinary Shares. As discussed above, prior to the Company’s IPO, the fair value of the Company’s ordinary shares underlying the Company’s share options was historically determined by the board of directors. Because prior to the Company’s IPO, there was no public market for the Company’s ordinary shares, the board of directors determined the fair value of the Company’s ordinary shares at the time of grant of the option by considering a number of objective and subjective factors, including valuations of comparable companies, sales of its shares to unrelated third parties, operating and financial performance and general and industry specific economic outlook. Following the completion of the Company’s IPO, theThe fair value of the ordinary shares underlying the Company’s share-based awards is based on the closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of grant.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

  

Expected Term. The expected term of share options represents the weighted-average period that the share options are expected to remain outstanding. The Company estimated the expected term using the simplified method, which is an average of the contractual term of the option and the vesting period.

 

  

Expected Volatility. Since there is limited historical data for the Company’s ordinary shares and limited company-specific historical volatility, it has determined the share price volatility for options granted based on an analysis of the volatility used by a peer group of publicly traded companies. In evaluating similarity, the Company considers factors such as industry, stage of life cycle and size.

 

  

Risk-free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant forzero-coupon U.S. Treasury notes with remaining terms similar to the expected term of the options.

 

  

Dividend Rate. The expected dividend was assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid dividends and has no current plans to do so.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements, but have not been reflected in taxable income. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value. Therefore, the Company provides a valuation allowance to the extent that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future.

The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements by applying atwo-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination by the taxingtax authorities. If the tax position is deemedmore-likely-than-not to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of any resulting tax reserves, or unrecognized tax benefits, that are considered appropriate as well as the related net interest and penalties.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax provision on the consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss.

The Company has certain service arrangements in place between its U.S., Japan, UKU.K. and Singapore entities, which include transfer pricing assumptions. The determination of the appropriate level of transfer pricing requires judgment based on transfer pricing analyses of comparable companies. The Company monitors the nature of its service arrangements for changes in its operations as well as economic conditions. The Company also periodically reviews the transfer pricing analyses for changes in the composition in the pool of comparable companies as well as the related ongoing results of the comparable companies.

Leases

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), using the modified retrospective approach and utilizing the effective date as its date of initial application, for which prior periods are presented in accordance with the previous guidance in ASC 840, Leases (“ASC 840”). In February 2016, the

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU2016-02”), which was further clarified when the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases (“ASU2018-10”), ASUNo. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842)—Targeted Improvements (“ASU2018-11”), and ASUNo. 2019-01, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases (“ASU2019-01”). The adoption of ASC 842, in accordance with ASU2016-02, ASU2018-10, ASU2018-11, and ASU2019-01, requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for operating leases and changes many key definitions, including the definition of a lease. ASC 842 includes a short-term lease exception for leases with a term of 12 months or less, in which a lessee can make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will continue to differentiate between finance leases (previously referred to as capital leases) and operating leases, using classification criteria that are substantially similar to the previous guidance. For lessees, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease have not significantly changed from previous U.S. GAAP. Lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply, as well as transition guidance specific to nonstandard leasing transactions. As further described above, the Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019 using a cumulative-effect adjustment on the effective date of the standard, for which comparative periods are presented in accordance with the previous guidance in ASC 840.

In adopting ASC 842, the Company elected to utilize the available package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which does not require the reassessment of the following: i) whether existing or expired arrangements are or contain a lease, ii) the lease classification of existing or expired leases, and iii) whether previous initial direct costs would qualify for capitalization under the new lease standard. Additionally, the Company made an accounting policy election to not recognize on the balance sheet leases with a term of 12 months or less.

At the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease based on the unique facts and circumstances present in the arrangement. Most leases with a term greater than one year are recognized on the balance sheet asright-of-use assets and short-term and long-term lease liabilities, as applicable. The Company typically only includes an initial lease term in its assessment of a lease arrangement. Options to renew a lease are not included in the Company’s assessment unless there is reasonable certainty that the Company will renew the lease. The Company monitors its plans to renew its leases on a quarterly basis.

Operating lease liabilities and their correspondingright-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the expected remaining lease term. Certain adjustments to theright-of-use asset may be required for items such as incentives received. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As a result, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate, which reflects the fixed rate at which the Company could borrow on a collateralized basis the amount of the lease payments in the same currency, for a similar term, in a similar economic environment. In transition to ASC 842, the Company utilized the remaining lease term of its leases in determining the appropriate incremental borrowing rates.

In accordance with ASC 842, components of a lease should be split into three categories: lease components (e.g., land, building, etc.),non-lease components (e.g., common area maintenance, consumables, etc.), andnon-components (e.g., property taxes, insurance, etc.). The fixed andin-substance fixed contract consideration (including any consideration related tonon-components) must be allocated based on the respective relative fair values to the lease components andnon-lease components.

Although separation of lease andnon-lease components is required, certain expedients are available. Entities may elect the practical expedient to not separate lease andnon-lease components by class of underlying asset. Rather,

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

entities would account for each lease component and the relatednon-lease component together as a single component. For new and amended leases beginning in 2019 and after, the Company has elected to account for the lease andnon-lease components for leases for classes of all underlying assets and allocate all of the contract consideration to the lease component only.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC605-25, Multiple-Element Arrangements and most industry-specific guidance. In addition, the FASB recently issued ASUs2016-10 and2016-12, which provide clarifying amendments to ASU2014-09. ASU2014-09 and its related amendments will be effective for the Company for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The update also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. Companies have the option of applying this new guidance retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (the full retrospective method) or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this update recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective method). The Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1,November 2018, under the full retrospective method.

Under ASC 606, an entity recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

ASC 606, the entity performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASC 606 also impacts certain other areas, such as the accounting for costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. The standard also requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

The Company is assessing but has not yet completed its assessment of the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements. Therefore, the Company does not know and cannot reasonably estimate the impact that adoption of ASC 606 is expected to have on the consolidated financial statements. Currently, the Company anticipates a potential impact on the revenue recognition method used to recognize revenue for the identified performance obligations under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement as well as the recognition of milestone revenue prior to achievement. The expected impact is further described below. Estimated impacts from the adoption of this standard could differ upon the final adoption and implementation of the standard.

With respect to the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the Company currently expects the five performance obligations identified under the provisions of ASC 606 will be consistent with the five units of accounting identified under the provisions of ASC 605. However, as previously described, it currently expects that the timing and pattern of revenue recognition under step (v) above will differ from the pattern of revenue recognition under ASC 605. Under ASC 606, the revenues will be recognized over time. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had recognized $5.2 million of revenue under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. Deferred revenue related to the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement amounted to $8.3 million as of December 31, 2017, of which $2.7 million is included in current liabilities. The Company expects a change in the timing and pattern of revenue recognition upon adoption of ASC 606 to impact the Company’s revenue, deferred revenue and net loss.

The Company expects the accounting for contingent milestone payments under its collaboration agreements to change under ASC 606. ASC 606 does not contain guidance specific to milestone payments, thereby requiring contingent milestone payments to be considered in accordance with the overall model of ASC 606. Revenue from contingent milestone payments may be recognized earlier under ASC 606 than under ASC 605, based on an assessment of the probability of achievement of the milestone event and the likelihood of a significant reversal of such milestone revenue at each reporting date. This assessment may result in the recognition of revenue related to a contingent milestone payment before the milestone event has been achieved.

ASC 606 requires more robust disclosures than required by previous guidance, including disclosures related to disaggregation of revenue into appropriate categories, performance obligations, the judgments made in revenue recognition determinations, adjustments to revenue which relate to activities from previous quarters or years, any significant reversals of revenue, and costs to obtain or fulfill contracts.

In connection with the adoption of these standards, the Company is implementing several new internal controls, including controls to monitor the probability of achievement of contingent milestone payments and the timing and pattern of performance of the performance obligation.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateNo. 2016-02, Leases2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606 (“ASU2016-02”2018-18”)., which requires The standard amends ASC 808, Collaborative Agreements and ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, to clarify the interaction between collaborative arrangement participants that should be accounted for as revenue under ASC 606. In transactions when the collaborative arrangement participant is a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities oncustomer in the balance sheet for operating leases and changes many key definitions, including the definitioncontext of a lease.unit of account, revenue should be accounted for using the guidance in ASC 606. The update includes a short-term lease exception for leases with a term of 12 months or less,amendments in which a lessee can make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will continue to differentiate between finance leases (previously referred to as capital leases) and operating leases, using classification criteria thatASU2018-18 are substantially similar to the previous

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

guidance. For lessees, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease have not significantly changed from previous U.S. GAAP. Lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply as well as transition guidance specific to nonstandard leasing transactions. ASU2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the potentialnew guidance included in ASU2018-18, but does not expect it to have a material impact that the adoption of ASU2016-02 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016,December 2019, the FASB issuedfinalized Accounting Standards UpdateNo. 2016-16,2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than InventorySimplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU2016-16”2019-12”),. which requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs, even though theASUpre-tax2019-12 effects of that transaction are eliminatedeliminates certain exceptions in consolidation.ASC 740 and generally simplifies existing guidance. The amendments arenew guidance is effective for fiscal years andbeginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. These amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings at the beginning of the period adopted. The Company will adopt ASU2016-16 in the first quarter of 2018 and the Company estimates that there will be a cumulative-effect increase of approximately $0.4 million to the Company’s accumulated deficit.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateNo. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU2016-18”). The ASU requires an entity to explain the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows and to provide a reconciliation of the totals in that statement to the related captions in the balance sheet when the cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and is required tobut may be adopted using a retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted.earlier by entities. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASU2016-182019-12 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2015,The Company adopted ASC 842 using the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.modified retrospective approach outlined in ASU2015-17, Balance2018-11 Sheet Classificationas of Deferred Taxes(“ASU 2015-17”), which requires entities to present deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The new standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company elected to adopt ASU2015-17 on a prospective basis.January 1, 2019. The adoption of this standard resulted in the recognition of operating lease liabilities andright-of-use assets of $35.4 million and $19.7 million, respectively, as well as the derecognition of the deferred rent and lease incentive obligation balances, which reduced theright-of-use asset on the Company’s balance sheet as of January 1, 2019 relating to its leases for its corporate headquarters in Cambridge, Massachusetts and for its manufacturing, laboratory and office facility in Lexington, Massachusetts.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU2018-02”), which allows companies to make aone-timereclassification of short-term deferredthe stranded tax assetseffects (as defined by ASU2018-02) from accumulated other comprehensive income to long-term deferredretained earnings as a result of the tax assets.legislation enacted in December 2017, commonly known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.” The Company adopted ASU2018-02 effective as of January 1, 2019 and applied it prospectively. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment, net, consists of the followingfollowing:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
  2017   2016   2019   2018 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Furniture and equipment

  $13,626   $7,231   $24,531   $20,300 

Software

   108    43    524    435 

Leasehold improvements

   16,029    1,964    27,830    27,342 

Fixed assets in progress

   1,988    1,863    486    1,354 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   31,751    11,101    53,371    49,431 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (4,417   (2,494

Less accumulated depreciation

   (17,003   (9,500
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Property and equipment, net

  $27,334   $8,607   $36,368   $39,931 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Leasehold improvements made duringSubstantially all of the years endedCompany’s long-lived assets were located in the United States as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016 consisted of costs related to the Company’s leased facilities in Cambridge, Massachusetts and Lexington, Massachusetts.2018.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.2$7.6 million, $0.8$5.6 million and $0.6$2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

4. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

 

   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (in thousands) 

Accrued compensation

  $5,428   $2,480 

Accrued professional fees

   3,281    417 

Accrued vacation

   33    589 

Other current liabilities

   156    948 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  $8,898   $4,434 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   December 31, 
   2019   2018 
   (in thousands) 

Accrued compensation

  $8,662   $7,507 

Accrued expenses related to CROs and CMOs

   5,030    5,502 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   2,493    1,727 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  $16,185   $14,736 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

5. PFIZER COLLABORATION AND SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENTAGREEMENTS

OnPfizer Collaboration and Equity Agreements

In May 5, 2016, the Company entered into a Research, License and Option Agreement (the(as amended in November 2017, the “Pfizer Collaboration Agreement”) with Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”). Pursuant to the terms of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Pfizer agreed to collaborate on the discovery, development and commercialization of stereopure oligonucleotide therapeutics for up to five programs (the “Pfizer Programs”), each directed at a genetically-defined hepatic target selected by Pfizer (the “Pfizer Collaboration”). The Company received $10.0 million as an upfront license fee under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. Subject to option exercises by Pfizer, the Company may earn potential research, development and commercial milestone payments, plus royalties, tiered up to low double-digits, on sales of any products that may result from the Pfizer Collaboration. None of the payments under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement are refundable.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

Simultaneously with the entry into the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Pfizer Equity Agreement,” and together with the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

“Pfizer “Pfizer Agreements”) with C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V., an affiliate of Pfizer (the “Pfizer Affiliate”). Pursuant to the terms of the Pfizer Equity Agreement, the Pfizer Affiliate purchased 1,875,000 of the Company’s ordinary shares (the “Shares”) at a purchase price of $16.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $30.0 million. The Company did not incur any material costs in connection with the issuance of the Shares.

Under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the parties agreed to collaborate during thea four-year Research Term.research term. During the Research Term,research term, the Company is responsible to use its commercially reasonable efforts to advance up to five programs through to the selection of clinical candidates. At that stage, Pfizer may elect to license any of these Pfizer Programs exclusively and to haveobtain exclusive rights to undertake the clinical development of the resulting clinical candidates into products and the potential commercialization of any such products thereafter. In addition, the Company receivesreceived anon-exclusive, royalty-bearing sublicenseablesublicensable license to use Pfizer’s hepatic targeting technology in any of the Company’s own hepatic programs that are outside the scope of the Pfizer Collaboration (the “Wave Programs”). If the Company uses this technology on the Wave Programs, Pfizer is eligible to receive potential development and commercial milestone payments from the Company. Pfizer is also eligible to receive tiered royalties on sales of any products that include Pfizer’s hepatic targeting technology.

Pfizer nominated two The Company is not currently utilizing Pfizer’s hepatic targets upon entry intotargeting technology in any of its own hepatic programs that are outside of the scope of the Pfizer Collaboration in May 2016. In August 2016, Pfizer nominated the third hepatic target under the Pfizer Collaboration for which the Company received a $2.5 million milestone payment in 2016. On November 5, 2017, the Company amended its Pfizer Collaboration Agreement to extend the target nomination period from November 5, 2017 to May 5, 2018. This amendment provides Pfizer with an additional six months to nominate the two remaining hepatic targets under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement.

The Company has determined that the options held by Pfizer under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement are substantive and priced at a significant incremental discount. Accordingly, $3.0 million of the upfront payment was allocated to the options to nominate the three remaining targets upon inception. The amount allocated to the three options will be recognized as the research and development services are provided commencing from the date that Pfizer exercises each respective option, or immediately as each option expires unexercised. The portion of the upfront payment allocated to the initial two targets was $7.0 million and will be recognized as the research and development services are provided from the inception of the arrangement. Subsequently, in 2016, Pfizer exercised its option to nominate a third program. The Company will recognize $3.5 million of revenue (which is comprised of $1.0 million allocated to the option at inception of the arrangement and $2.5 million paid by Pfizer at the time of exercising the option) as the research and development services are provided. In November 2017, the Company achieved a milestone under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the revenue related to this milestone was recognized in full during the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Pfizer Collaboration is managed by a joint steering committee in which both parties are represented equally, which will oversee the scientific progression of each Pfizer Program up to the clinical candidate stage. During the four-year Research Term and for a period of two years thereafter, the Company has agreed to work exclusively with Pfizer with respect to using any of the Company’s stereopure oligonucleotide technology that is specific for the applicable hepatic target which is the basis of any Pfizer Program.

The stated term of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement commenced on May 5, 2016 and terminates on the date of the last to expire payment obligation with respect to each Pfizer Program and, with respect to each Wave Program, expires on aprogram-by-program basis accordingly. Pfizer may terminate its rights related to a Pfizer Program under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement at its own convenience upon 90 days’ notice to the Company. The Company may also terminate its rights related to a Wave Program at its own convenience upon 90 days’ notice to Pfizer. The Pfizer Collaboration Agreement may also be terminated by either party in the event of an uncured material breach of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement by the other party.

Pfizer nominated two hepatic targets upon entry into the Pfizer Collaboration in May 2016. The Pfizer Collaboration Agreement provides Pfizer with options to nominate up to three additional programs by making nomination milestone payments. Pfizer nominated the third, fourth and fifth hepatic targets in August 2016, March 2018 and April 2018, respectively.

The Pfizer Collaboration is managed by a joint steering committee in which both parties are represented equally, which will oversee the scientific progression of each Pfizer Program up to the clinical candidate stage. During the four-year research term and for a period of two years thereafter, the Company has agreed to work exclusively with Pfizer with respect to using any of the Company’s stereopure oligonucleotide technology that is specific for the applicable hepatic target which is the basis of any Pfizer Program. Within a specified period after receiving a data package for a candidate under each nominated program, Pfizer may exercise an option to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize the program candidate by paying an exercise price per program.

The Company assessed this arrangement in accordance with ASC 606 and concluded that the contract counterparty, Pfizer, is a customer. The Company identified the following promises under the arrangement: (1) thenon-exclusive, royalty-free research and development license; (2) the research and development services for Programs 1 and 2; (3) the program nomination options for Programs 3, 4 and 5; (4) the research and development services associated with Programs 3, 4 and 5; (5) the options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 1 and 2; and (6) the options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 3, 4 and 5. The research and development services for each of

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

Programs 1 and 2 were determined to not be distinct from the research and development license and should be combined into a single performance obligation for each program. The promises under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement relate primarily to the research and development required by the Company for each of the programs nominated by Pfizer.

Additionally, the Company determined that the program nomination options for Programs 3, 4 and 5 were priced at a discount and, as such, provide material rights to Pfizer, representing three separate performance obligations. The research and development services associated with Programs 3, 4 and 5 and the options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 3, 4 and 5 are subject to Pfizer’s exercise of the program nomination options for such programs and therefore do not represent performance obligations at the outset of the arrangement. The options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 1 and 2 do not represent material rights; as such, they are not representative of performance obligations at the outset of the arrangement. Based on these assessments, the Company identified five performance obligations in the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement: (1) research and development services and license for Program 1; (2) research and development services and license for Program 2; (3) material right provided for the option to nominate Program 3; (4) material right provided for the option to nominate Program 4; and (5) material right provided for the option to nominate Program 5.

At the outset of the arrangement, the transaction price included only the $10.0 millionup-front consideration received. The Company determined that the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement did not contain a significant financing component. The program nomination option exercise fees for research and development services associated with Programs 3, 4 and 5 that may be received are excluded from the transaction price until each customer option is exercised. The potential milestone payments were excluded from the transaction price, as all milestone amounts were fully constrained at the inception of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. The exercise fees for the options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 3, 4 and 5 that may be received are excluded from the transaction price until each customer option is exercised. The Company will reevaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur, and, if necessary, will adjust its estimate of the transaction price.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, it became probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue would not occur for a developmental milestone under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. At such time, the associated consideration was added to the estimated transaction price and allocated to the existing performance obligations, and the Company recognized a cumulativecatch-up to revenue for this developmental milestone, representing the amount that would have been recognized had the milestone payment been included in the transaction price from the outset of the arrangement. The remainder will be recognized in the same manner as the remaining, unrecognized transaction price over the remaining period until each performance obligation is satisfied.

Revenue associated with the performance obligations relating to Programs 1 and 2 is being recognized as revenue as the research and development services are provided using an input method, according to the full-time employee (“FTE”) hours incurred on each program and the FTE hours expected to be incurred in the future to satisfy the performance obligation. The transfer of control occurs over time and, in management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation. The amount allocated to the three material rights will be recognized as the underlying research and development services are provided commencing from the date that Pfizer exercises each respective option, or immediately as each option expires unexercised. The amounts received that have not yet been recognized as revenue are recorded in deferred revenue on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

Pfizer nominated the third, fourth and fifth hepatic targets in August 2016, March 2018 and April 2018, respectively. Upon each exercise, the Company allocated the transaction price amount allocated to the material right at inception of the arrangement plus the program nomination option exercise fee paid by Pfizer at the time of exercising the option to a new performance obligation, which will be recognized as revenue as the research and development services are provided using the same method as the performance obligations relating to Programs 1 and 2.

Through December 31, 2019, the Company had recognized revenue of $17.0 million as collaboration revenue in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized revenue of $3.7$7.1 million, $4.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively, under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. DeferredThe aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s partially unsatisfied performance obligations and recorded in deferred revenue amountedat December 31, 2019 is $1.5 million, all of which is included in current liabilities. The Company expects to $8.3 millionrecognize the remaining deferred revenue according to FTE hours incurred, over the remaining research term, which is four months as of December 31, 2019.

Takeda Collaboration and Equity Agreements

In February 2018, Wave USA and Wave UK entered into a global strategic collaboration (the “Takeda Collaboration”) with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (“Takeda”), pursuant to which Wave USA, Wave UK and Takeda agreed to collaborate on the research, development and commercialization of oligonucleotide therapeutics for disorders of the Central Nervous System (“CNS”). The Takeda Collaboration provides Wave with at least $230.0 million in committed cash and Takeda with the option toco-develop andco-commercialize Wave’s CNS development programs in (1) Huntington’s disease (“HD”); (2) amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (“ALS”) and frontotemporal dementia (“FTD”); and (3) Wave’s discovery-stage program targetingATXN3 for the treatment of spinocerebellar ataxia 3 (“SCA3”) (collectively, “Category 1 Programs”). In addition, Takeda will have the right to exclusively license multiple preclinical programs for CNS disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease (collectively, “Category 2 Programs”). In April 2018, the Takeda Collaboration became effective and Takeda paid Wave $110.0 million as an upfront payment. Takeda also agreed to fund Wave’s research and preclinical activities in the amount of $60.0 million during the four-year research term and to reimburse Wave for any collaboration-budgeted research and preclinical expenses incurred by Wave that exceed that amount.

Simultaneously with Wave USA and Wave UK’s entry into the collaboration and license agreement with Takeda (the “Takeda Collaboration Agreement”), the Company entered into a share purchase agreement with Takeda (the “Takeda Equity Agreement,” and together with the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, the “Takeda Agreements”) pursuant to which it agreed to sell to Takeda 1,096,892 of its ordinary shares at a purchase price of $54.70 per share. In April 2018, the Company closed the Takeda Equity Agreement and received aggregate cash proceeds of $60.0 million. The Company did not incur any material costs in connection with the issuance of shares.

With respect to Category 1 Programs, Wave will be responsible for researching and developing products and companion diagnostics for Category 1 Programs through completion of the first proof of mechanism study for such products. Takeda will have an exclusive option for each target and all associated products and companion diagnostics for such target, which it may exercise at any time through completion of the proof of mechanism study. If Takeda exercises this option, Wave will receivean opt-in payment and will lead manufacturing and jointclinical co-development activities and Takeda will leadjoint co-commercial activities in the United States and all commercial activities outside of the United States. Global costs and potential profits will be shared 50:50

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

and Wave will be eligible to receive development and commercial milestone payments. In addition to its 50% profit share, Wave is eligible to receive option exercise fees and development and commercial milestone payments for each of the Category 1 Programs.

With respect to Category 2 Programs, Wave has granted Takeda the right to exclusively license multiple preclinical programs during a four-year research term (subject to limited extension for programs that were initiated prior to the expiration of the research term, in accordance with the Takeda Collaboration Agreement) (“Category 2 Research Term”). During that term, the parties may collaborate on preclinical programs for up to six targets at any one time. Wave will be responsible for researching and preclinically developing products and companion diagnostics directed to the agreed upon targets through completion of Investigational New Drug application (“IND”)-enabling studies in the first major market country. Thereafter, Takeda will have an exclusive worldwide license to develop and commercialize products and companion diagnostics directed to such targets, subject to Wave’s retained rights to lead manufacturing activities for products directed to such targets. Takeda will fund Wave’s research and preclinical activities in the amount of $60.0 million during the research term and will reimburse Wave for any collaboration-budgeted research and preclinical expenses incurred by Wave that exceed that amount. Wave is also eligible to receive tiered high single-digitto mid-teen royalties on Takeda’s global commercial sales of products from each Category 2 Program.

Under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, each party grants to the other party specific intellectual property licenses to enable the other party to perform its obligations and exercise its rights under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, including license grants to enable each party to conduct research, development and commercialization activities pursuant to the terms of the Takeda Collaboration Agreement.

The term of the Takeda Collaboration Agreement commenced on April 2, 2018 and, unless terminated earlier, will continue until the date on which: (i) with respect to each Category 1 Program target for which Takeda does not exercise its option, the expiration or termination of the development program with respect to such target; (ii) with respect to each Category 1 Program target for which Takeda exercises its option, the date on which neither party is researching, developing or manufacturing any products or companion diagnostics directed to such target; or (iii) with respect to each Category 2 Program target, the date on which royalties are no longer payable with respect to products directed to such target.

Takeda may terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement for convenience on 180 days’ notice, in its entirety or on atarget-by-target basis. Subject to certain exceptions, each party has the right to terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement ona target-by-target basis if the other party, or a third party related to such party, challenges the patentability, enforceability or validity of any patents within the licensed technology that cover any product or companion diagnostic that is subject to the Takeda Collaboration Agreement. In the event of any material breach of the Takeda Collaboration Agreement by a party, subject to cure rights, the other party may terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement in its entirety if the breach relates to all targets or ona target-by-target basis if the breach relates to a specific target. In the event that Takeda and its affiliates cease development, manufacturing and commercialization activities with respect to compounds or products subject to the Takeda Collaboration Agreement and directed to a particular target, Wave may terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement with respect to such target. Either party may terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement for the other party’s insolvency. In certain termination circumstances, Wave would receive a license from Takeda to continue researching, developing and manufacturing certain products, and companion diagnostics.

The Takeda Collaboration is managed by a joint steering committee in which both parties are represented equally. The JSC is tasked with overseeing the scientific progression of each Category 1 Program and the Category 2 Programs.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

The Company assessed this arrangement in accordance with ASC 606 and concluded that the contract counterparty, Takeda, is a customer for Category 1 Programs prior to Takeda exercising its option, and for Category 2 Programs during the Category 2 Research Term. The Company identified the following material promises under the arrangement: (1) thenon-exclusive, royalty-free research and development license for each Category 1 Program; (2) the research and development services for each Category 1 Program through completion of the first proof of mechanism study; (3) the exclusive option to license,co-develop andco-commercialize each Category 1 Program; (4) the right to exclusively license the Category 2 Programs; and (5) the research and preclinical development services of the Category 2 Programs through completion ofIND-enabling studies. The research and development services for each Category 1 Program were determined to not be distinct from the research and development license and should therefore be combined into a single performance obligation for each Category 1 Program. The research and preclinical development services for the Category 2 Programs were determined to not be distinct from the exclusive licenses for the Category 2 Programs and should therefore be combined into a single performance obligation.

Additionally, the Company determined that the exclusive option for each Category 1 Program was priced at a discount and, as such, provide material rights to Takeda, representing three separate performance obligations. Based on these assessments, the Company identified seven performance obligations in the Takeda Collaboration Agreement: (1) research and development services through completion of the first proof of mechanism andnon-exclusive research and development license for HD; (2) research and development services through completion of the first proof of mechanism andnon-exclusive research and development license for ALS and FTD; (3) research and development services through completion of the first proof of mechanism andnon-exclusive research and development license for SCA3; (4) the material right provided for the exclusive option to license,co-develop andco-commercialize HD; (5) the material right provided for the exclusive option to license,co-develop andco-commercialize ALS and FTD; (6) the material right provided for the exclusive option to license,co-develop andco-commercialize SCA3; and (7) the research and preclinical development services and right to exclusively license the Category 2 Programs.

At the outset of the arrangement, the transaction price included the $110.0 million upfront consideration received and the $60.0 million of committed research and preclinical funding for the Category 2 Programs. The Company determined that the Takeda Collaboration Agreement did not contain a significant financing component. The option exercise fees to license,co-develop andco-commercialize each Category 1 Program that may be received are excluded from the transaction price until each customer option is exercised. The potential milestone payments were excluded from the transaction price, as all milestone amounts were fully constrained at the inception of the Takeda Collaboration Agreement. The Company will reevaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and, as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur, if necessary, will adjust its estimate of the transaction price.

The Company allocated the transaction price to the performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. For the performance obligations associated with the research and development services through completion of the first proof of mechanism andnon-exclusive research and development license for HD; the research and development services through completion of the first proof of mechanism andnon-exclusive research and development license for ALS and FTD; the research and development services through completion of the first proof of mechanism andnon-exclusive research and development license for SCA3; and the research and preclinical development services and right to exclusively license the Category 2 Programs, the Company determined the standalone selling price using estimates of the costs to perform the research and development services, including expected internal and external costs for services and supplies, adjusted to reflect a profit margin. The total estimated cost of the research and development services reflected the nature of the services to be performed and the Company’s best estimate of the length of time required to perform the services. For the

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

performance obligations associated with the material right provided for the exclusive option to license,co-develop andco-commercialize HD; the material right provided for the exclusive option to license,co-develop andco-commercialize ALS and FTD; and the material right provided for the exclusive option to license,co-develop andco-commercialize SCA3, the Company estimated the standalone fair value of the option to license each Category 1 Program utilizing an adjusted market assessment approach, and determined that any standalone fair value in excess of the amounts to be paid by Takeda associated with each option represented a material right.

Revenue associated with the research and development services for each Category 1 Program performance obligation is being recognized as the research and development services are provided using an input method, according to the costs incurred on each Category 1 Program and the total costs expected to be incurred to satisfy each Category 1 Program performance obligation. Revenue associated with the research and preclinical development services for the Category 2 Programs performance obligation is being recognized as the research and preclinical development services are provided using an input method, according to the costs incurred on Category 2 Programs and the total costs expected to be incurred to satisfy the performance obligation. The transfer of control for these performance obligations occurs over time and, in management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligations. The amount allocated to the material right for each Category 1 Program option will be recognized on the date that Takeda exercises each respective option, or immediately as each option expires unexercised. The amounts received that have not yet been recognized as revenue are recorded in deferred revenue on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized revenue of $8.8 million and $9.6 million, respectively, in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement. No revenue was earned in 2017 under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement as it became effective in April 2018. The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s unsatisfied and partially unsatisfied performance obligations and recorded in deferred revenue at December 31, 2019 is $151.6 million, of which $2.7$88.2 million is included in current liabilities. The Company expects to recognize revenue for the portion of the deferred revenue that relates to the research and development services for each Category 1 Program and the Category 2 Programs as costs are incurred over the remaining research term. The Company expects to recognize revenue for the portion of the deferred revenue that relates to the material right for each Category 1 Program option upon Takeda’s exercise of such option, or immediately as each option expires unexercised. The aggregate amount of the transaction price included in accounts receivable at December 31, 2019 is $50.0 million, of which $20.0 million is included in current assets.

6. SHARE CAPITAL

Ordinary Shares

The following represents the historical ordinary share transactions of the Company from December 31, 20132016 through December 31, 2017:2019:

 

In February 2014, the Company issued 2,263,291 ordinary shares to a third-party investor at $2.47 per share for net proceeds of $5.6 million. In connection with this financing, holders of $9.6 million of related party notes payable agreed to convert such notes into 2,365,139 Series A preferred shares and 1,515,596 ordinary shares.

In January 2015, the Company issued 4,769,077 ordinary shares to a third-party investor and an existing investor at $2.47 per share for net proceeds of $11.6 million.

In March 2015, the Company granted 190,856 fully-vested ordinary shares to an executive of the Company.

In November 2015, the Company completed an initial public offering of its ordinary shares, in which the Company issued and sold 6,375,000 ordinary shares at a price to the public of $16.00 per share. In December 2015, the Company issued an additional 618,126 ordinary shares at a price of $16.00 per share pursuant to a partial exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The aggregate net proceeds to the Company from the initial public offering, inclusive of the over-allotment exercise, were $100.4 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. In connection with this financing, the Company’s 5,334,892 Series B preferred shares automatically converted into 5,334,892 of the Company’s ordinary shares.

In May 2016, the Company granted 1,875,000 ordinary shares to Pfizer under the Pfizer Agreements (Note 5) at a purchase price of $16.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $30.0 million.

In April 2017, the Company closed afollow-on underwritten public offering of 4,166,667 ordinary shares at a purchase price of $24.00 per share for gross proceeds of $100.0 million. The net proceeds from this issuance were $93.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses.

Features of

In April 2018, the Ordinary Shares

TheCompany issued 1,096,892 ordinary shares have no par value and there is no conceptto Takeda under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement (Note 5) at a purchase price of authorized$54.70 per share, capital under Singapore law. The rights, preferences, and privilegesfor an aggregate purchase price of $60.0 million.

In January 2019, the Company closed afollow-on underwritten public offering of 3,950,000 ordinary shares are as follows:at a purchase price of $38.00 per share for gross proceeds of $150.1 million, and in February

New Share Offering

Prior to the closing of the Company’s initial public offering, any new ordinary shares or securities convertible into ordinary shares were required to be offered in the first instance to all the then holders of any class of shares, other than the Series A preferred shares, prior to issuance and each shareholder had the right ofpre-emption with respect to any issuance of new ordinary shares or securities convertible into ordinary shares. This right ofpre-emption did not apply to shares sold in the Company’s initial public offering and terminated immediately prior to the closing of the Company’s initial public offering.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

2019 the Company closed on the sale of an additional 592,500 ordinary shares (collectively, the “January 2019 Offering”) for gross proceeds of an additional $22.5 million. The net proceeds to the Company from the January 2019 Offering were $161.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

Features of the Series A Preferred Shares and Ordinary Shares

The Series A preferred shares and ordinary shares have no par value and there is no concept of authorized share capital under Singapore law. The Series A preferred shares are not redeemable.

Voting

The holders of Series A preferred shares are not entitled to vote on any of the matters proposed to shareholders, other than as specified in the Company’s Constitution. The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to one vote for each ordinary share held at all meetings of shareholders and written actions in lieu of meetings.

Dividends

All dividends, if any, shall be declared and paid pro rata according to the number of shares held by each member entitled to receive dividends. The Company’s board of directors may deduct from any dividend all sums of money presently payable by the member to the Company on account of calls.

Liquidation

In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of, or a return of capital by the Company, the ordinary shares will rank equally with the Series A preferred shares after the payment of the liquidation preference of $10.00an aggregate of approximately $10 thousand for Series A preferred shares.

Series A Preferred Shares

The following represent the Series A preferred share transactions of the Company from December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2017:

In February 2014, holders of $9.6 million of related party notes payable agreed to convert such notes into 2,365,139 Series A preferred shares and 1,515,596 ordinary shares.

In connection with the private placement of Series B preferred shares on August 14, 2015, holders of the Company’s preference shares agreed to rename the existing “preference shares” as “Series A preferred shares.” In addition, as further described below, the terms of the Series A preferred shares were amended to remove their right of first refusal and to provide for their right to convert on aone-for-one basis into an aggregate of 3,901,348 ordinary shares at any time at the election of the holder. The rights of the Series A preferred shares are identical to the ordinary shares except that the Series A preferred shares have: (1) no voting rights other than in limited circumstances, (2) the right to anon-cumulative dividend if and when declared by the Company’s board of directors and (3) the right to convert the Series A preferred shares at any time on aone-for-one basis into ordinary shares at the discretion of the holder. The Company’s shareholders, including holders of Series A preferred shares, entered into an investors’ rights agreement and a voting agreement with the Company in connection with the private placement. Pursuant to the terms of the voting agreement, which terminated in connection with the Company’s IPO, investors who held at least 1,212,477 shares of registerable securities, including holders of Series A preferred shares and Series B preferred shares, had a right to purchase certain new securities offered by the Company. Additionally, in the event of the sale of 50% or more of the voting power of the Company or a deemed liquidation event, if the holders of at least a majority of the ordinary shares and the holders of 56% of the Series B preferred shares had voted for a sale of the Company, they had the right to force the other shareholders, including the holders of Series A preferred shares, to agree to such a sale.

In September 2015, the terms of the Series A preferred shares were further amended to provide that, upon the mandatory conversion of Series B preferred shares, which occurred on the completion of the initial public offering, the existing right of Series A preferred shares to anon-cumulative dividend if and when declared by our board of directors ceased and was replaced by a liquidation preference consisting of $0.002 per Series A preferred share, or an aggregate of $10.00 based on the number of Series A preferred shares outstanding at the date of the amendment.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

The Company has accounted for the September 2015 amendment to the Series A preferred shares as a modification of the preferred shares based on upon a qualitative assessment of the amendment. The Company has not adjusted the carrying value of the Series A preferred shares since the fair value of the Series A preferred shares immediately prior and subsequent to the modification date resulted in an immaterial change in fair value.

The addition of the liquidation preference to the Series A preferred shares, however, resulted in the reclassification of the Series A preferred shares from permanent shareholders’ equity to temporary shareholders’ equity since the holders of the Series A preferred shares are entitled to a liquidation preference upon a deemed liquidation event, which is outside the control of the Company. In the event a deemed liquidation event were to occur, the Company would adjust the carrying value of the Series A preferred shares to their liquidation value, which amounts to $10.00 in the aggregate.

The Series A preferred shares have no par value and there is no concept of authorized share capital under Singapore law. The Series A preferred shares are not redeemable.

Series B Preferred Shares Converted in Connection with Initial Public Offering

The following represents the historical Series B preferred share transactions of the Company from January 1, 2015 through the completion of our initial public offering:

On August 14, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,334,892 Series B preferred shares at a purchase price of $12.37 per share to certain third-party investors for $62.5 million of net proceeds.

Upon the completion of the initial public offering on November 16, 2015, all of the outstanding Series B preferred shares of the Company automatically converted into 5,334,892 of the Company’s ordinary shares.

Prior to the conversion of the Series B preferred shares into ordinary shares, the Series B preferred shares had a liquidation preference over the Series A preferred shareholders and ordinary shareholders equal to the original per share amount paid of $12.37 per share, plus any declared plus unpaid dividends, if any. Additionally, the holders of Series B preferred shares were entitled to voting rights, however, the Series B preferred shareholders were not entitled to any preferential dividends and their shares were not redeemable.

7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

In December 2014, the Company’s board of directors adopted the Wave Life Sciences Ltd. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), and reserved 1,763,714 ordinary shares for issuance under this plan, which was increased to 5,064,544 in 2015, and to 6,064,544 in 2017.2017, to 6,943,344 in 2018, and to 7,971,331 in 2019. The 2014 Plan authorizes the board of directors or a committee of the board to grant incentive share options,non-qualified share options, share appreciation rights, restricted awards, which include restricted shares and restricted share units (“RSUs”), and performance awards to eligible employees, consultants andnon-employees directors of the Company. The Company accounts for grants to its board of directors as grants to employees.

As of December 31, 2017, 1,716,1102019, 1,081,856 ordinary shares remained available for future grant under the 2014 Plan.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

Share option activity under the 2014 Plan is summarized as follows:

 

   Number of
Shares
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted-
Average

Remaining
Contractual

Term
(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)(1)
 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2017

   3,577,766  $10.58     

Granted

   522,750   26.33     

Exercised

   (137,493  6.74     

Forfeited or cancelled

   (195,893  14.71     
  

 

 

  

 

 

     

Outstanding as of December 31, 2017

   3,767,130  $12.69    7.81   $84,675 
  

 

 

  

 

 

     

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2017

   2,257,455  $7.64    7.43   $62,060 

Options unvested as of December 31, 2017

   1,509,675  $20.23    8.37   $22,614 
   Number of
Shares
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)(1)
 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2019

   4,016,590  $19.47     

Granted

   163,200   21.89     

Exercised

   (213,556  12.20     

Forfeited or cancelled

   (127,685  32.47     
  

 

 

  

 

 

     

Outstanding as of December 31, 2019

   3,838,549  $19.54    6.13   $7,530 
  

 

 

  

 

 

     

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2019

   2,972,764  $15.17    5.75   $7,530 

 

(1) 

The aggregate intrinsic value of options is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the share options and the fair value of the Company’s ordinary shares for those share options that had exercise prices lower than the fair value of the ordinary shares as of the end of the period.

Options generally vest over a periodperiods of three orone to four years, and options that are forfeited or cancelled are available to be granted again. The contractual life of options is generally five or ten years from the grant date. Share-based compensation expense related to options is included in research and development expenses or general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of share options granted to employees during the period were as follows:

 

  For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016   2015  2019 2018 2017 

Risk-free interest rate

   1.49% - 2.23%    1.15% - 2.18%    1.56% - 1.89%  1.34% - 2.62%   2.49% - 3.01%   1.49% - 2.23% 

Expected term (in years)

   3.00 - 6.25    3.00 - 6.25    5.52 - 6.12   3.00 - 6.11   3.00 - 6.25   3.00 - 6.25 

Expected volatility

   68.95% - 72.24%    60.89% - 68.76%    62.14% - 71.02%   68% - 74%   64% - 71%   69% - 72% 

Expected dividend yield

   0%    0%    0%   0%   0%   0% 

The assumptions usedoptions that were granted tonon-employees in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value2015 were fully vested as of shareDecember 31, 2018. There have been no additional options granted tonon-employees duringsince 2015.

RSU activity for the period wereyear ended December 31, 2019 is summarized as follows:

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2015

Risk-free interest rate

2.06% - 2.35%

Expected term (in years)

9.19 - 10.00

Expected volatility

62.65% - 69.80%

Expected dividend yield

0%

There were no options granted tonon-employees in 2017 or 2016.

   RSUs   Average Grant
Date Fair
Value (in
dollars per
share)
 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2019

   408,521   $37.16 

Granted

   1,566,855    42.71 

Vested

   (112,437   36.61 

Forfeited

   (111,077   42.69 
  

 

 

   

RSUs Outstanding at December 31, 2019

   1,751,862   $41.81 
  

 

 

   

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

RSU activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is summarized as follows:

   RSUs   Average Grant
Date Fair
Value (in
dollars per
share)
 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2017

   22,750    21.69 

Granted

   170,859    29.05 

Vested

   (22,750   21.69 

Forfeited

   (16,400   29.05 
  

 

 

   

RSUs Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   154,459   $29.05 
  

 

 

   

There were no RSUs granted in 2015. The RSUs granted in 2016 fully vested upon the first anniversary of the grant date andOf the RSUs granted, in 2017567,915 were time-based RSUs and 998,940 were performance-based RSUs. Vesting of these performance-based RSUs is contingent on the occurrence of certain regulatory and commercial milestones. Time-based RSUs generally vest annually over a periodperiods of one to four years. RSUs that are forfeited are available to be granted again. Share-based compensationThe Company did not recognize an expense in 2019 related to the performance-based RSUs is included in research and development expenses or general and administrative expenses onas the consolidated statementsrelated milestones were not considered probable of operations.achievement.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, the unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options was $16.9$17.1 million for employees and $1.0 million fornon-employees.employees. The unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options for employees andnon-employees is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.61.94 years. For the years ended December 31, 20172019, 2018 and 2016,2017, the weighted-average grant date fair value per granted option was $16.58$11.95, $27.90 and $30.23,$16.58, respectively. The aggregate fair value of options that vested during the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, was $15.2 million, $9.3 million and $11.5 million.million, respectively. The unrecognized compensation costs related to outstanding time-based RSUs was $3.5$23.7 million as of December 31, 2017,2019, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.112.76 years.

In March 2015, The total fair value of RSUs vested during the Company granted 190,856 fully-vested ordinary shares to an executive of the Companyyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and the Company recorded compensation expense in the amount of $0.9 million. Share-based compensation expense related to these fully-vested ordinary shares is included in general2017 was $4.2 million, $1.8 million, and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.$0.4 million, respectively.

Share-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 is classified as operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss as follows:

 

  For the Year Ended December 31,   For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016   2015   2019   2018   2017 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Research and development expenses

  $7,670   $4,936   $2,268   $9,479   $9,172   $7,670 

General and administrative expenses

   4,473    1,911    1,756    10,030    6,424    4,473 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total share-based compensation expense

  $12,143   $6,847   $4,024   $19,509   $15,596   $12,143 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

There was no share-based compensation expense recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019 related to options granted tonon-employees.Of the total share-based compensation expense recorded for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, 2016$1.4 million and 2015, $2.9 million, $2.7 million and $1.6 millionrespectively, related to options granted tonon-employees, respectively, all of which is included in research and development expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.operations and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

comprehensive loss.

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESLEASES

Lease Arrangements

The Company enters into lease arrangements for its facilities as well as certain equipment.facilities. A summary of the arrangements areis as follows:

Operating Leases

On September 26, 2016, and as amended on December 31, 2016, the Company entered into a 10 year and 9 month lease, which includes two successive five yearfive-year renewal options, for its facility in Lexington, Massachusetts, which the Company uses primarily for its cGMPcurrent good manufacturing practices (“cGMP”) manufacturing, as well as for additional laboratory and office space. Throughout the term of the lease, the Company is responsible for paying certain costs and expenses, in addition to the rent, as specified in the lease, including a proportionate share of applicable taxes, operating expenses and utilities. In connection withAs required under the terms of the lease agreement, the Company issued the lessor a letter of credit in the amounthas placed restricted cash of $2.6 million which is included in restricted casha separate bank account at December 31, 2017.2019 and 2018.

In connection with the lease agreement,

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

As of December 31, 2018, the Company is entitled to receive $11.5had received $11.4 million of tenant improvement allowances. The Company has received $3.6 million as of December 31, 2017,allowances, which is amortized overwas the period from the commencement of tenant improvement construction through to the end ofmaximum amount allowed per the lease term.for the Lexington, Massachusetts facility. In applying the ASC 842 transition guidance, the Company utilized the operating lease classification and recorded a lease liability and aright-of-use asset on the ASC 842 effective date, with the lease incentive obligation beingde-recognized and serving to reduce theright-of-use asset.

In April 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for an office and laboratory facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which commenced in October 2015 with a term of 7.5 years with a five-year renewal option to extend the lease. In connection withAs required under the terms of the lease agreement, the Company issued the lessor a letter of credit in the amounthas placed restricted cash of $1.0 million which is recorded as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheetsin a separate bank account at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.

Previously,2018. In applying the ASC 842 transition guidance, the Company leased its corporate office space in Boston, Massachusetts underutilized the operating lease classification and recorded lease liability and anon-cancellableright-of-use operating sublease with SNBL,asset on the ASC 842 effective date.

The following table contains a related party. On September 22, 2015, the Company terminated its sublease with SNBL and exited the premises on October 2, 2015. As a resultsummary of the termination oflease costs recognized under ASC 842 and other information pertaining to the sublease, the Company recorded approximately $0.2 million of additional depreciation and $0.1 million of exit costs duringCompany’s operating leases for the year ended December 31, 2015. In connection with the termination, the Company agreed to guarantee SNBL certain obligations of an unrelated third party who entered into a sublease agreement with SNBL effective October 2, 2015. The guarantee provides that in the event thesub-lessee does not meet its lease obligations to SNBL, the Company will make the required payments. The guarantee agreement is effective through August 2019, when the final2019:

   For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 
   (in thousands) 

Lease cost

  

Operating lease cost

  $4,472 
  

 

 

 

Total lease cost

  $4,472 
  

 

 

 

Other information

  

Operating cash flows used for operating leases

  $5,675 

Operating lease liabilities arising from obtainingright-of-use assets

  $ 

Weighted average remaining lease term

   7.3 years 

Weighted average discount rate

   8.5

Future minimum lease payments are due, and coincides with the original expiration of the lease. The Company simultaneously entered into an indemnification agreement with thesub-lessee to indemnify the Company for any costs incurred under the guarantee made by the Company to SNBL. The maximum amountCompany’snon-cancelable operating leases as of the guarantee over the three year and six monthsub-lease period is $0.6 million, exclusive of any indemnification from thesub-lessee.

December 31, 2019, are as follows:

   As of
December 31,
2019
 
   (in thousands) 

2020

  $5,846 

2021

   6,021 

2022

   6,201 

2023

   5,236 

2024

   5,002 

Thereafter

   15,925 
  

 

 

 

Total lease payments

  $44,231 

Less: imputed interest

   (11,684
  

 

 

 

Total operating lease liabilities

  $32,547 
  

 

 

 

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

Future minimum lease payments under the Company’snon-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2017,2018, are as follows:

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

  Amount 
  (in thousands)   As of
December 31,
2018
 

2018

   4,666 
  (in thousands) 

2019

   5,675   $5,675 

2020

   5,846    5,846 

2021

   6,021    6,021 

2022

   6,201    6,201 

2023

   5,236 

Thereafter

   26,163    20,927 
  

 

   

 

 

Total lease payments

  $49,906 
   54,572   

 

 
  

 

 

The Company recorded rent expense of $5.6$4.5 million, $1.5$4.9 million and $0.5$5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

Capital Lease

In April 2015, the Company entered into a three year lease to acquire laboratory equipment, which has been accounted for as a capital lease. The capital asset was valued at $0.3 million and is included in property and equipment, net, along with accumulated amortization of $0.1 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Unasserted Claims

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation as the Company operates in an industry susceptible to patent and other legal claims. The Company accounts for estimated losses with respect to legal proceedings and claims when such losses are probable and estimable. Legal costs associated with these matters are expensed when incurred. The Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.

9.10. NET LOSS PER ORDINARY SHARE

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2017 2016 2015   2019 2018 2017 
  (in thousands except share and per share data)   (in thousands except share and per share data) 

Numerator:

        

Net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders

  $(102,035 $(55,401 $(19,200  $(193,638 $(146,653 $(101,980
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Denominator:

        

Weighted-average ordinary shares outstanding

   26,513,382  22,800,628  10,501,455    33,866,487  28,970,404  26,513,382 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net loss per share, basic and diluted

  $(3.85 $(2.43 $(1.83  $(5.72 $(5.06 $(3.85
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The Company’s potentially dilutive shares, which include outstanding share options to purchase ordinary shares and restricted share units, are considered to be ordinary share equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share when their effect is dilutive.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

The following potential ordinary shares, presented based on amounts outstanding at each period end, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share attributable to ordinary shareholders for the periods indicated because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:

 

  As of December 31,   As of December 31, 
  2017   2016   2019   2018 

Options to purchase ordinary shares

   3,767,130    3,577,766    3,838,549    4,016,590 

Restricted share units

   154,459    22,750 

RSUs

   1,751,862    408,521 

Series A preferred shares

   3,901,348    3,901,348    3,901,348    3,901,348 

10.11. INCOME TAXES

The components of loss before income taxes were as follows:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016   2015   2019 2018 2017 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Singapore

  $(76,885  $(53,387  $(16,534  $(5,931 $(14,523 $(76,696

Rest of world

   (24,442   (1,398   (2,622   (187,707 (132,061 (24,442
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loss before income taxes

  $(101,327  $(54,785  $(19,156  $(193,638 $(146,584 $(101,138
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded no income tax provision. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2018 and 2015,2017, the Company recorded aan income tax provision of $0.7 million, $0.6$0.1 million and less than $0.1$0.8 million, respectively. The 2018 income tax provision was due to adjustments related to the filing of the Company’s 2017 tax returns with the relevant tax authorities. The 2017 tax provision was due to the Company’s establishment of a valuation allowance against the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets, and U.S.as well as income generated under research and management services arrangements between the Company’s U.S. and Singapore entities, which is taxed in the U.S. The 2016 and 2015 tax provisions were primarily the result of U.S. income generated under research and management services arrangements between the Company’s U.S. and Singapore entities which is taxed in the U.S.

On October 1, 2017, the Company made changes to its corporate entity operating structure, including transferring intellectual property from the Japanese subsidiary to the Singapore parent company, as well as transferring intellectual property from the Singapore parent company to the U.S. and UK subsidiaries, primarily to align the Company’s intellectual property holding and management structure with its business functions. The transfer of assets occurred between wholly-owned legal entities within the Wave group that are all based in different tax jurisdictions. As the impact of the transfer was the result of an intra-entity transaction, any resulting gain or loss and immediate tax impact on the transfer is eliminated and not recognized in the consolidated financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The recipient entities will receive a tax benefit associated with the future amortization of the intellectual property received in accordance with the applicable tax laws. As discussed in Note 2, the Company will adopt ASU2016-16 in the first quarter of 2018 and the Company estimates that there will be a cumulative-effect increase of approximately $0.4 million to the Company’s accumulated deficit.United States.

During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded no income tax benefit for the net operating losses incurred in Singapore, the United States, and the United Kingdom, due to uncertainty regarding future taxable income in those jurisdictions. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded no income tax benefit for the net operating losses incurred in Singapore, the United States, Japan and the United Kingdom, due to uncertainty regarding future taxable income in those jurisdictions. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded no income tax benefit for the net operating losses incurred in Singapore and Japan,the United Kingdom, due to uncertainty regarding future taxable income in those jurisdictions. In May 2016, the Company established a wholly-owned subsidiary in Ireland, however no income tax expense or benefit has been recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. In April 2017, the Company established a wholly-owned subsidiary in the UK, however, during the year ended December 31, 2017 no income tax benefit was recorded related to the net operating losses incurred in the UK due to uncertainty regarding future taxable income in that jurisdiction.2019, 2018 or 2017.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017 and includes significant changes to the U.S. corporate tax system. Effective January 1, 2018, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and transitioned the U.S. federal tax system from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system. On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) that provides additional guidance allowing companies to apply a measurement period of up to twelve months to account for the impacts of the Tax Act in their financial statements. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has accounted for the impacts of the Tax Act to the extent a reasonable estimate could be made. The Company recognized a $0.8 million provisional charge related to the remeasurement of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, which was included as a component of the Company’s provision for income taxes and was fully offset by a corresponding amount in the Company’s valuation allowance. The Company will continue to refine its estimates throughout the measurement period or until the accounting is complete as allowed under SAB 118.

The components of the benefit (provision) for income taxes were as follows:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016   2015   2019   2018   2017 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Current benefit (provision) for income taxes:

            

Singapore taxes

  $199   $—     $—   

Rest of world taxes

   (133   (1,180   (8

Singapore

  $—     $(4  $199 

Rest of world

   —      (65   (133
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current benefit (provision) for income taxes

  $66   $(1,180  $(8  $—     $(69  $66 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred benefit (provision) for income taxes:

            

Singapore taxes

  $—     $—     $—   

Rest of world taxes

   (774   564    (36

Singapore

  $—     $—     $(134

Rest of world

   —      —      (774
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred benefit (provision) for income taxes

  $(774  $564   $(36  $—     $—     $(908
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total benefit (provision) for income taxes

  $(708  $(616  $(44  $—     $(69  $(842
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

A reconciliation of the Singapore statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2017 2016 2015   2019 2018 2017 

Singapore statutory income tax rate

   17.0 17.0 17.0   17.0 17.0 17.0

Federal and state tax credits

   5.7  3.1  2.3    9.4  6.6  5.7 

Permanent differences

   (2.6 (0.9 5.5    (1.5 (0.3 (2.6

Changes in reserves for uncertain tax positions

   (3.5 (3.6 (1.2   (3.2 (2.3 (3.5

Foreign rate differential

   2.8  (0.1 1.2    7.0  7.8  2.8 

Tax rate change

   (0.9  —     —      (0.4 (0.3 (0.9

Other

   0.5  (0.9 0.2    1.3  0.2  0.4 

Change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance

   (19.7 (15.7 (25.2   (29.6 (28.7 (19.7
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effective income tax rate

   (0.7)%  (1.1)%  (0.2)%    —     —    (0.8)% 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

The components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 are as follows:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
  2017   2016   2019   2018 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Net operating loss carryforwards

  $28,913   $16,046   $89,585   $58,661 

Federal and state tax credits

   4,522    449    31,336    13,783 

Accrued expenses

   1,903    242    —      4,276 

Share-based compensation

   1,921    1,024    6,342    3,811 

Accumulated amortization

   11,169    18,829 

Operating lease liabilities

   8,892    —   

Deferred revenue

   14,299    —   

Other

   176    102    424    1,267 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   37,435    17,863    162,047    100,627 

Valuation allowance

   (36,069   (15,999   (156,680   (99,438
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   1,366    1,864    5,367    1,189 

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Depreciation

   (1,366   (1,090

Operating leaseright-of-use assets

   (4,945   —   

Accumulated depreciation

   (422   (1,155

Other

   —      (34
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (1,366   (1,090   (5,367   (1,189
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

  $—     $774   $—     $—   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

A roll-forward of the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 is as follows:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016       2019           2018     
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Balance at beginning of year

  $15,999   $7,466   $99,438   $36,069 

Increase in valuation allowance

   20,595    8,774    57,235    63,337 

Reversal of valuation allowance

   (598   (282   —      —   

Effect of foreign currency translation

   73    41    7    32 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at end of year

  $36,069   $15,999   $156,680   $99,438 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards in the United States of $137.1 million, $135.1 million of which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities indefinitely, while $2.0 million of carryforwards that were in existence as of December 31, 2017 may offset future income tax liabilities up through 2037. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had state net operating loss carryforwards of $127.8 million that will begin to expire in 2038. As of December 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, the Company has U.S. federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $2.8$8.9 million and $0.2$6.2 million, respectively, available to offset future U.S. federal income taxes.taxes and will begin to expire in 2031. As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company has state research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1.1$6.3 million and $0.3$1.8 million, respectively, available to offset future state income taxes. The U.S. federaltaxes and state research and development tax credits will begin to expire in 2032.2033, and state investment tax credit carryforwards of $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, that will begin to expire in 2020. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company had a U.S. orphan drug credit carryforward of $0.4$16.6 million whichthat will begin to expire in 2037.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards in Japan of $4.1 million and $5.3 million, respectively, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities and begin to expire in 2021.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards in Singapore of $149.2 million and $84.0 million, respectively, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities and can be carried forward indefinitely.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

As of December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards in Japan of $2.9 million and $2.9 million, respectively, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities and begin to expire in 2023.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards in Singapore of $171.6 million and $161.3 million, respectively, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities and can be carried forward indefinitely.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards in the UKUnited Kingdom of $10.5$133.1 million and $46.4 million, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities and can be carried forward indefinitely.

The Company has evaluated the positive and negative evidence bearing upon its ability to realize its deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2016,2019, management has considered the Company’s history of cumulative net losses incurred since inception and its lack of commercialization of any products or generation of any revenue from product sales since inception and has concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets in Japan and Singapore.all jurisdictions. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been established against those deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016. Additionally as of December 31, 2016, management has considered the Company’s expected utilization of U.S. research and development credit carryforwards and has concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of the U.S. state research and development tax credit carryforward. As of December 31, 2016, there was a $0.8 million deferred tax asset in the U.S. As of December 31, 2017, management has considered the Company’s history of cumulative net losses incurred since inception and its lack of commercialization of any products or generation of any revenue from product sales since inception, as well as the corporate entity restructuring, and has concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets in Singapore, the U.S., Japan and the UK. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been established against those deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017.2019.

The valuation allowance increased by approximately $57.2 million in 2019, $63.3 million in 2018 and $20.1 million in 2017 $8.5 million in 2016 and $4.8 million in 2015 primarily as a result of operating losses generated with no corresponding financial statement benefit. The Company may release this valuation allowance when management determines that it ismore-likely-than-not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Any release of valuation allowance will be recorded as a tax benefit either increasing net income or decreasing net loss.

The Company’s reserves related to taxes and its accounting for uncertain tax positions are based on a determination of whether and how much of a tax benefit taken by the Company in its tax filings or positions ismore-likely-than-not to be realized following resolution of any potential contingencies present related to the tax benefit.

A summary of activity in the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

  2017   2016   2015   2019   2018   2017 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Unrecognized tax benefit at the beginning of the year

  $2,343   $1,280   $1,025   $10,219   $6,207   $2,343 

Tax positions released related to prior years

   —      (1,066   —   

Tax positions related to prior years

   (14   430    —   

Tax positions related to statute lapse

   (23   —      —   

Tax positions related to the current year

   3,864    2,129    255    6,500    3,582    3,864 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefit at the end of the year

  $6,207   $2,343   $1,280   $16,682   $10,219   $6,207 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, which excludes interest and penalties, was $6.2$16.7 million, $2.3$10.2 million and $1.3$6.2 million, respectively. At December 31, 2017, $4.22019, $1.0 million of the net unrecognized tax benefits would affect the Company’s annual effective tax rate if recognized.

The Company does not expect to record any material reductions inanticipates that $0.9 million of the measurement of itstotal unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2019 will decrease within the next twelve months.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

months due to a statute lapse.

The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of its income tax provision. As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company had incurredrecorded less than $0.1 million and zero, respectively, of interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

The Company files income tax returns as prescribed by the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by various taxingtax authorities in the U.S.,United States, Japan, Singapore and Singapore. There are currently no pending income tax examinations.the United Kingdom. Tax years from 20122016 to the present are still open to examination in the U.S.,United States, from 20082015 to the present in Japan, and from 20122015 to the present in Singapore.Singapore and from 2017 to the present in the United Kingdom. To the extent that the Company has tax attribute carryforwards, the tax years in which the attribute was generated may still be adjusted upon examination by the tax authorities to the extent utilized in a future period.

As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016, $48.82018, $17.2 million and $1.7$53.0 million, respectively, of cash was held by the subsidiaries outside of Singapore. The Company does not provide for Singapore income tax or foreign withholding taxes on foreign unrepatriated earnings, as the Company intends to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings in its foreign subsidiaries. If the Company decides to change this assertion in the future to repatriate any additional foreign earnings, the Company may be required to accrue and pay taxes. Because of the complexity of Singapore and foreign tax rules applicable to the distribution of earnings from foreign subsidiaries to Singapore, the determination of the unrecognized deferred tax liability on these earnings is not practicable.

Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and research and development tax credit carryforwards in the U.S.United States may be subject to a substantial annual limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), due to ownership changes that have occurred previously or that could occur in the future. These ownership changes may limit the amount of carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain shareholders or public groups in the shares of a corporation by more than 50% over a three-year period. In 2015,2018, the Company completed a study to assess whether an ownership change has occurred or whether there have been multiple ownership changes since its formation. The results of this study indicated that the Company experienced ownership changes as defined by Section 382 of the Code. Based on the results of the study, management has determined that the limitations will not have a material impact on the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating losses and research and development credit carryforwards to offset future tax liabilities. Should an ownership change have occurred after December 31, 20152018 or occur in the future, the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating losses and research and development tax credit carryforwards may be limited.

11.12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has a 401(k) retirement and savings plan (the “401(k) Plan”) covering all U.S.-based employees.employees of Wave USA. The 401(k) Plan allows employees to make contributions up to the maximum allowable amount set by the IRS.Internal Revenue Service. Under the 401(k) Plan, the Company may make discretionary contributions as approved by the board of directors. The Company made contributions of $1.0 million, $0.7 million, and $0.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company did not make contributions to the 401(k) Plan during the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2015.

2019, 2018, and 2017 respectively.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

12.13. RELATED PARTIES

The Company had the following related party transactions for the periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, which have not otherwise been discussed in these notes to the consolidated financial statements:

 

The Company held cash of $0.1 million in depository accounts with Kagoshima Bank, Ltd., an affiliate of one of the Company’s shareholders, Kagoshima Shinsangyo Sousei Investment Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 20172017. These depository accounts were closed during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and 2016.

its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

Pursuant to the terms of various service agreements with SNBL,Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories Ltd., one of the Company’s shareholders, and its affiliates (together “SNBL”), the Company paid SNBL $0.5 million, $0.4$1.3 million and $0.1$0.5 million for the yearsnine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, for contract research services provided to the Company and its affiliates. Effective as of October 1, 2018, our contract research services arrangement with SNBL ended.

 

In 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement for scientific advisory services with Dr. Gregory L. Verdine, one of the Company’s founders and a member of the Company’s board of directors. The consulting agreement does not have a specific term and may be terminated by either party upon 14 days’ prior written notice. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, the Company pays Dr. Verdine approximately $13 thousand per month, plus reimbursement for certain expenses.

13. GEOGRAPHIC DATA

The Company’s long-lived assets consist of property and equipment, net, and are located in the following geographical areas:

   December 31,
2017
   December 31,
2016
 
   (in thousands) 

Japan

  $14   $136 

United States

   27,320    8,471 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-lived assets

  $27,334   $8,607 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

Year ended December 31, 2017

14. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

Selected quarterly results from operations for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 are as follows:

 

  2017 Quarter Ended   2019 Quarter Ended 
  March 31   June 30   September 30   December 31   March 31   June 30   September 30   December 31 
  (in thousands, except for per share data)   (in thousands, except for per share data) 

Revenues

  $676   $676   $676   $1,676   $3,026   $7,628   $2,929   $2,400 

Operating expenses

   20,590    25,770    27,668    32,256    51,014    53,245    57,108    62,933 

Loss from operations

   (19,914   (25,094   (26,992   (30,580   (47,988   (45,617   (54,179   (60,533

Net loss

   (20,996   (24,693   (26,135   (30,211   (44,200   (41,942   (50,726   (56,770

Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share

  $(0.89  $(0.92  $(0.94  $(1.09  $(1.36  $(1.22  $(1.48  $(1.65

 

  2016 Quarter Ended   2018 Quarter Ended 
  March 31   June 30   September 30   December 31   March 31   June 30   September 30   December 31 
  (in thousands, except for per share data)   (in thousands, except for per share data) 

Revenues

  $—     $417   $392   $676   $1,422   $4,879   $4,493   $3,620 

Operating expenses

   7,952    12,055    17,625    19,180    37,197    41,452    42,725    52,563 

Loss from operations

   (7,952   (11,638   (17,233   (18,504   (35,775   (36,573   (38,232   (48,943

Net loss

   (7,847   (11,565   (17,535   (18,454   (35,241   (35,894   (37,631   (37,887

Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share

  $(0.36  $(0.51  $(0.75  $(0.79  $(1.26  $(1.23  $(1.28  $(1.29

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTSEVENT

Takeda CollaborationOn February 6, 2020, the Company implemented a plan to reduce operating costs and License Agreement

In February 2018, twobetter align its workforce with the needs of its business following the Company’s December 16, 2019 announcement of its decision to discontinue the suvodirsen program for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (“DMD”) and to cease development of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a global strategic collaboration (the “Takeda Collaboration”)other DMD programs. Under this cost reduction plan, the Company reduced its workforce by approximately 22%. The Company estimates that provides Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (“Takeda”) withit willincur one-time restructuring charges of approximately $3.5 million, including employee severance, benefits and related termination costs, the optionmajority of which it expects toco-develop andco-commercialize the Company’s CNS development programs pay in Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, as well as a discovery stage program targeting ATXN3 for the treatment of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. In addition, Takeda has the right to license multiple preclinical programs for CNS indications including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Subject to customary closing conditions, including the expiration or early termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”), the Takeda Collaboration is expected to become effective during the first quarter of 2018.2020.

Simultaneously with the Company’s entry into the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, the Company entered into a share purchase agreement with Takeda pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to Takeda 1,096,892 of its ordinary shares at a purchase price of $54.70 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $60.0 million (the “Takeda Equity Investment”). Subject to customary closing conditions, including the expiration or early termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act, the Takeda Equity Investment is expected to close during the first quarter of 2018.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 20172019

Supplementary Financial Information of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (Parent Company)

WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD.

BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 

  December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
   December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
 

Assets

      

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $93,680  $148,636   $129,960  $121,853 

Intercompany receivables

   5,920  4,133 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   1,931  2,026 

Intercompany accounts receivable

   1,229  121 

Prepaid expenses

   1,667  703 

Other current assets

   201  462 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   101,531  154,795    133,057  123,139 

Long-term assets:

      

Intercompany loans to subsidiaries

   —    14,295 

Investment in subsidiary—Wave USA

   42,713  1,509    —     —   

Investment in subsidiary—Wave UK

   10,736   —      —     —   

Investment in subsidiary—Wave Japan

   3,037   —      2,914  2,918 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total long-term assets

   56,486  15,804    2,914  2,918 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  $158,017  $170,599   $135,971  $126,057 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Liabilities, Series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity

      

Current liabilities:

      

Accounts payable

  $248  $757   $540  $516 

Intercompany accounts payable

   11,714  12,545    5,179  8,493 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   492  461    1,039  392 

Current portion of deferred revenue

   2,705  2,705    1,482  6,802 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   15,159  16,468    8,240  16,203 

Long-term liabilities:

      

Deferred revenue, net of current portion

   5,607  8,311    —    1,851 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total long-term liabilities

   5,607  8,311    —    1,851 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

  $20,766  $24,779   $8,240  $18,054 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Series A preferred shares, no par value; 3,901,348 shares issued and outstanding

  $7,874  $7,874 

Series A preferred shares, no par value; 3,901,348 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018

  $7,874  $7,874 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Shareholders’ equity:

      

Ordinary shares, no par value; 27,829,079 and 23,502,169 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

   310,038  215,602 

Ordinary shares, no par value; 34,340,690 and 29,472,197 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively

   539,547  375,148 

Additionalpaid-in capital

   8,450  4,401    11,928  10,744 

Accumulated deficit

   (189,111 (82,057   (431,618 (285,763
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   129,377  137,946    119,857  100,129 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities, Series A preferred shares and shareholders’ equity

  $158,017  $170,599   $135,971  $126,057 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the supplementary financial information.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 20172019

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

1. DOMICILE AND ACTIVITIES

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (the “Parent”), formerly Wave Life Sciences Pte. Ltd., registration number 201218209G, is a company incorporated in the Republic of Singapore on July 23, 2012. The Parent’s registered office is located at 7 Straits View#12-00, Marina One East Tower, Singapore 018936. The Parent was incorporated with the purpose of combining two commonly held companies, Wave Life Sciences USA, Inc. (“Wave USA”), a Delaware corporation (formerly Ontorii, Inc.), and Wave Life Sciences (Japan) (“Wave Japan”), a company organized under the laws of Japan (formerly Chiralgen., Ltd.), which occurred on September 13, 2012. On May 31, 2016, Wave Life Sciences Ireland Limited (“Wave Ireland”) was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. On April 3, 2017, Wave Life Sciences UK Limited (“Wave UK”) was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

On November 5, 2015, the Parent converted from a Singapore private company limited by shares to a Singapore public company limited by shares. In connection with this conversion, the Parent changed its name from “Wave Life Sciences Pte. Ltd.” to “Wave Life Sciences Ltd.”

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (together with its subsidiaries, “Wave” or the “Company”) is a biotechnologyclinical-stage genetic medicines company with an innovativecommitted to delivering life-changing treatments for people battling devastating diseases. Using PRISM, Wave’s proprietary discovery and proprietary synthetic chemistry drug development platform that enables the precise design, optimization and production of novel stereopure oligonucleotides, the Company is usingaspires to rationally design, develop and commercialize a broad pipeline offirst-in-class orbest-in-class nucleic acid therapeutic candidatesbest in class medicines for genetically defined diseases. Nucleic acid therapeutics arediseases with a growing and innovative classhigh degree of drugs that have the potential to address diseases that have historically been difficult to treat with small molecule drugs or biologics. Nucleic acid therapeutics, or oligonucleotides, are comprised of a sequence of nucleotides that are linked together by a backbone of chemical bonds. The Company is initially developing oligonucleotides that target genetic defects to either reduce the expression of disease-promoting proteins or transform the production of dysfunctional mutant proteins into the production of functional proteins.unmet need.

The Company’s primary activities since inception have been developing an innovative and proprietary synthetic chemistry drug development platformPRISM to design, develop and commercialize nucleic acid therapeutic programs,oligonucleotide therapeutics, advancing the Company’s neurology franchise, expandingCentral Nervous System (“CNS)” business, building the Company’s research and development activities into additional therapeutic areas includingin ophthalmology and hepatic, advancing programs into the clinic, furthering clinical development of such clinical-stage programs, building the Company’s intellectual property, recruiting personnel and assuring adequate capital to support these activities.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of preparation

In order to comply with the requirements of the Singapore Companies Act, (“the Act”), the Parent must present supplementary balance sheets comprised solely from the standalone accounts of Wave Life Sciences Ltd., the Parent company. This supplementary financial information is presented on page F-29.

The Parent applied to the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore (“ACRA”) for an exemption from preparing its 20172019 Singapore Statutory Financial Statements in accordance with Singapore Financial Reporting Standards. The Parent applied for this exemption because it is listed on the Nasdaq and therefore is required to prepare its audited annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) in order to maintain its listing on

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2017

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Nasdaq. These U.S. GAAP annual consolidated financial statements (“U.S. GAAP consolidated financials”) were included in the Form10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 12, 2018.2, 2020. The Parent received the exemption from ACRA and therefore the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except as noted in the paragraph entitled “Investment in Subsidiaries.” The U.S. GAAP consolidated financials are included in these Singapore Statutory Financial Statements on pagesF-1 to F-28.F-34.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Functional and presentation currency

This supplementary financial information is presented in U.S. dollars, which is the Parent’s functional currency.

Investment in Subsidiaries

For the purposes of the supplementary financial information provided as a part of the Singapore Statutory Financial Statements, the Parent did not consolidate its investments in subsidiaries and reported these investments as separate lines in the Parent’s standalone balance sheet. The Parent’s investment in each subsidiary is accounted for by either increasing its initial investment in each subsidiary by that subsidiary’s net income for each financial year or by decreasing its initial investment in each subsidiary by that subsidiaries net loss for each financial year to the extent of the initial investment of the subsidiary. U.S. GAAP requires that a Parent’s investments in subsidiaries be consolidated.

Cash Equivalents

The Parent considers all highly liquid securities with original final maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are comprised of funds in money market accounts.

Reclassifications

The Parent has reclassified certain prior period financial statement amounts to conform to its current period presentation. These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations of prior periods.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the supplementary financial information. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in the supplementary financial information include the assumptions used to determine the fair value of share-based awards, the periodParent’s revenue recognition policy, particularly, (a) assessing the number of performance obligations; (b) determining the transaction price; (c) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (d) determining the pattern over which revenue is recognized under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement (as defined in Note 5), the evaluation of progressperformance obligations are satisfied, including estimates to completion of external research and development costs which can result in prepaid or accrued expensescomplete performance obligations, and the valuation allowance required for the Parent’s deferred tax assets and determining uncertain tax positions and the related liabilities. Estimates are periodically reviewed in light of changes in circumstances, facts and experience. Actual results could differ from the Parent’s estimates.

Going Concern

At each reporting period, the Parent evaluates whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the Parent’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The Parent is required to make certain additional disclosures if it concludes substantial doubt exists and it is not alleviated by the Parent’s plans or when its plans alleviate substantial doubt about the Parent’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Parent’s evaluation entails analyzing prospective operating budgets and forecasts for expectations of the Parent’s cash needs and comparing those needs to the current cash and cash equivalents balance.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Parent is required to disclose information on all assets and liabilities reported at fair value that enables an assessment of the inputs used in determining the reported fair values. The fair value hierarchy is a hierarchy of inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the financial instrument based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Parent. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Parent’s assumptions about the inputs

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2017

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

that market participants would use in pricing the financial instrument and are developed based on the information available in the circumstances. The fair value hierarchy applies only to the valuation inputs used in determining the reported fair value of the investments and is not a measure of the investment credit quality. The hierarchy defines three levels of valuation inputs:

Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date of identical, unrestricted assets.

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 includes investments valued at quoted prices adjusted for legal or contractual restrictions specific to the security.

Level 3—Pricing inputs are unobservable for the asset, that is, inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset. Level 3 includes private investments that are supported by little or no market activity.

Cash and cash equivalents are Level 1 assets which are comprised of funds held in readily available checking and money market accounts. The Parent’s cashCash and cash equivalents were recorded at fair value as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, totaling $93.7$130.0 million and $148.6$121.9 million, respectively. The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities. Accounts receivable relate to the Parent’s collaboration agreement.

Given their related party nature, intercompany accounts receivables intercompany loans to subsidiaries and intercompany accounts payables were transacted based upon terms and amounts set forth between the Parent and its subsidiaries.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are financial instruments that potentially subject the Parent to concentration of credit risk. The Parent uses high quality, accredited financial institutions to maintain its cash and cash equivalents and, accordingly, such funds are subject to minimal credit risk. The Parent has not experienced any losses in such accounts and management believes that the Parent is not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held. The Parent has no financial instruments withoff-balance sheet risk of loss.

Revenue Recognition

As of December 31, 2017,Effective January 1, 2018, the Parent’s only significant source of revenue is derived from the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement pursuant to which the Parent and Pfizer (as defined in Note 5) have agreed to collaborate on the discovery, development and commercialization of stereopure oligonucleotide therapeutics for the Pfizer Programs (as defined in Note 5), each directed at a genetically-defined hepatic target selected by Pfizer. The Parent entered into the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement in May 2016.

The Parent presents revenue from the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”),Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 808”606”). In addition,, using the Parent recognizes revenue in accordance withfull retrospective transition method. As a result of adopting ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (“606 on January 1, 2018, the Company revised its comparative financial statements for the prior year as if ASC 605”). Accordingly, revenue is recognized606 had been effective for each unit of accounting when all of the following criteria are met:that period.

persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 20172019

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

delivery has occurred

This standard applies to all contracts with customers, except for contracts that are within the scope of other standards, such as leases, insurance, and financial instruments. Under ASC 606, an entity recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, have been rendered;

in an amount that reflects the seller’sconsideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the entity performs the following five-step analysis: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the buyerperformance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step analysis to contracts when it is fixedprobable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it is entitled in exchange for the goods or determinable;services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract, determines those that are performance obligations, and

collectability assesses whether each promised good or service is reasonably assured.
distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.

The Company has entered into collaboration agreements for research, development, and commercial services, under which the Company licenses certain rights to its product candidates to third parties. The terms of these arrangements typically include payment to the Company of one or more of the following:non-refundable, upfront license fees; reimbursement of certain costs; customer option exercise fees; development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments; and royalties on net sales of licensed products. Any variable consideration is constrained and, therefore, the cumulative revenue associated with this consideration is not recognized until it is deemed not to be at significant risk of reversal.

In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as the Parent fulfills its obligations under each of its agreements for which the collaboration partner is also a customer, the Parent performs the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Parent satisfies each performance obligation. As part of the accounting for these arrangements, the Parent must use significant judgment to determine: (a) the number of performance obligations based on the determination under step (ii) above; (b) the transaction price under step (iii) above; and (c) the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations as a measure of progress in step (v) above. The Parent uses significant judgment to determine whether milestones or other variable consideration, except for royalties, should be included in the transaction price as described further below. The transaction price is allocated to the optional goods and services the Parent expects to provide. The Parent uses estimates to determine the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations.

Amounts received prior to satisfying thebeing recognized as revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue. Amounts expected to be recognized as revenue within the 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as current portion of deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts not expected to be recognized as revenue within the 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as deferred revenue, net of current portion.

Pursuant to the accounting guidance in ASC605-25, the Parent evaluatesmultiple-element arrangements to determine (1) the deliverables included in the arrangement and (2) whether the individual deliverables represent separate units of accounting or whether they must be accounted for as a combined unit of accounting. This evaluation involves subjective determinations and requires the Parent to make judgments about the individual deliverables and whether such deliverables are separable from the other aspects of the contractual relationship. Deliverables are considered separate units of accounting provided that the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis and, if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in the Parent’s control. In assessing whether an item has standalone value, the Parent considers factors such as the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization capabilities of the collaboration partner and the availability of the associated expertise in the general marketplace. In addition, the Parent considers whether the collaboration partner can use a deliverable for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining deliverable, whether the value of the deliverable is dependent on the undelivered item and whether there are other vendors that can provide the undelivered items.

Under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the Parent and Pfizer agreed to collaborate on the discovery, development and commercialization of up to five Pfizer Programs, two of the five targets were declared upon initiation of the agreement in May 2016. The Pfizer Collaboration Agreement provides Pfizer with certain options to nominate up to three remaining programs and the Parent is required to consider whether such options are substantive. Options are considered substantive if, at the inception of the arrangement, the Parent is at risk as to whether the collaboration partner will choose to exercise the option. Factors that the Parent considers in evaluating whether an option is substantive include whether the optional elements are essential to the functionality of other programs nominated, whether economic factors compel Pfizer to purchase the optional elements, the cost to exercise the option, the overall objective of the arrangement and, the benefit Pfizer might obtain from the arrangement without exercising the option. In August 2016, Pfizer nominated the third hepatic target under the Collaboration and pursuant to the terms of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, Pfizer had the option to nominate two additional targets by November 5, 2017. On November 5, 2017, the Parent amended its Pfizer Collaboration Agreement to extend the target nomination period from November 5, 2017 to May 5, 2018. This amendment provides Pfizer with an additional six months to nominate the two remaining hepatic targets under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. Pfizer nominated the fourth and fifth hepatic targets in March 2018 and April 2018, respectively.

When an option is considered substantive and there is no significant incremental discount, the option is not considered a deliverable in the arrangement and no consideration is allocated to it. Conversely, when an option is not considered substantive or it is considered substantive but is priced at an incremental discount, it is analyzed

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 20172019

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

to determine ifLicenses of intellectual property:In assessing whether a promise or performance obligation is distinct from the other promises, the Parent considers factors such as the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization capabilities of the customer and the availability of the associated expertise in the general marketplace. In addition, the Parent considers whether the customer can benefit from a promise for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining promise, whether the value of the promise is dependent on the unsatisfied promise, whether there are other vendors that could provide the remaining promise, and whether it should beis separately identifiable from the remaining promise. For licenses that are combined with other deliverablespromises, the Parent utilizes judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue. The Parent evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

Research and development services: If an arrangement is determined to contain a promise or obligation for the Parent to perform research and development services, the Parent must determine whether these services are distinct from other promises in the arrangement. OptionsIn assessing whether the services are distinct from the other promises, the Parent considers the capabilities of the customer to perform these same services. In addition, the Parent considers whether the customer can benefit from a promise for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining promise, whether the value of the promise is dependent on the unsatisfied promise, whether there are other vendors that could provide the remaining promise, and whether it is separately identifiable from the remaining promise. For research and development services that are substantive and priced at a significant and incremental discount are further assessedcombined with other promises, the Parent utilizes judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a portionpoint in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue. The Parent evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

Customer options:If an arrangement is determined to contain customer options that allow the customer to acquire additional goods or services, the goods and services underlying the customer options are not considered to be performance obligations at the outset of the upfront payment shouldarrangement, as they are contingent upon option exercise. The Parent evaluates the customer options for material rights, that is, the option to acquire additional goods or services for free or at a discount. If the customer options are determined to represent a material right, the material right is recognized as a separate performance obligation at the outset of the arrangement. The Parent allocates the transaction price to material rights based on the standalone selling price. As a practical alternative to estimating the standalone selling price when the goods or services are both (i) similar to the original goods and services in the contract and (ii) provided in accordance with the terms of the original contract, the Parent allocates the total amount of consideration expected to be received from the customer to the total goods or services expected to be provided to the customer. Amounts allocated to any material right are not recognized as revenue until the option is exercised and other deliverables in the arrangement.performance obligation is satisfied.

Milestone payments:At the inception of aneach arrangement that includes milestone payments, the Parent evaluates whether eacha significant reversal of cumulative revenue provided in conjunction with achieving the milestones is probable, and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue would not occur, the associated milestone value is substantive and at risk to both parties onincluded in the basistransaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the contingent nature of the milestone. This evaluation includes an assessment of whether: (1) the consideration is commensurate with either the Parent’s performance to achieve the milestoneParent or the enhancementlicensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. For other milestones, the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from its performance to achieve the milestone, (2) the consideration relates solely to past performance and (3) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. The Parent evaluates factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial, and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the particular milestone and the level of effort and investment required to achieve the particular milestone in making this assessment. There is considerable judgment involved in determining whether a milestone satisfies all of the criteria required to conclude that a milestone is substantive. Revenue from substantive milestones will be recognized in its entirety upon successful accomplishment of the milestone.

Aside from the program nomination payments, which relate to the options described above, the remaining milestone payments required under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement are contingent upon the Parent’s performance under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, including in certain instances, regulatory approval. The Parent views these milestones as substantive and has excluded the amounts as allocable consideration at the outset of the arrangement. All commercial milestones will be accounted for in the same manner as royalties and recorded as revenue upon achievement of the milestone, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

The Parent recognizes arrangement consideration allocated to each unit of accounting when all of the revenue recognition criteria in ASC 605 are satisfied for that particular unit of accounting. In the event that a deliverable does not represent a separate unit of accounting, the Parent recognizes revenue from the combined unit of accounting over the Parent’s contractual or estimated performance period for the undelivered elements, which is typically the term of the Parent’s research and development obligations. If there is no discernible pattern of performance or objectively measurable performance measures do not exist, then the Parent recognizes revenue under the arrangement on astraight-line basis over the period the Parent is expected to complete its performance obligations. Conversely, if the pattern of performance in which the service is provided to the customer can be determined and objectively measurable performance measures exist, then the Parent recognizes revenue under the arrangement using the proportional performance method. Revenue recognized is limited to the lesser of the cumulative amount of payments received or the cumulative amount of revenue earned, as determined using thestraight-line method or proportional performance method, as applicable, as of the period ending date.

The Parent has concluded that the deliverables under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement relate primarily to the research and development required by the Parent for each of the programs nominated by Pfizer. The remaining deliverables, including sample supplies provided by each party to fulfill its obligation as a licensee, participation on a joint steering committee to oversee the research and development activities, and regulatory responsibilities related to filings and obtaining approvals related to the products that may result from each program do not represent separate units of accounting based on their dependence on the research and development efforts.

Because there is no discernible pattern of performance given the nature of the research and development efforts, the Parent recognizes the allocated revenue for each deliverable under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement on a

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 20172019

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

straight-line basis overThere is considerable judgment involved in determining whether it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue would not occur. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Parent reevaluates the probability of achievement of all milestones subject to constraint and, if necessary, adjusts its estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulativecatch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment.

Royalties: For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on a level of sales, and the license is expecteddeemed to completebe the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Parent recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). To date, the Parent has not recognized any royalty revenue resulting from any of its performance obligations for each deliverable, or unitlicensing arrangements.

Contract costs: The Parent recognizes as an asset the incremental costs of accounting. Forobtaining a contract with a customer if the first two Pfizer Programs, this period iscosts are expected to be fromrecovered. As a practical expedient, the initiation dateParent recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, which was May 5, 2016, and for the other Pfizer Programs, the periodasset that it otherwise would have recognized is expected to be from the date that work commences on those programs through the earlier of (a) the termination of the research and development performance obligations under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, which is May 5, 2020 (the “Research Term”),one year or (b) the estimatedless. To date, the Parent expects to meet its research and development performance obligations under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. Given the uncertainty as to when the research and development performance obligations will be completed, the Parent has used the Research Termnot incurred any incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer.

For additional discussion of accounting for purposes of applying the straight-line method for revenue recognition for the year ended December 31, 2017.collaboration revenues, see Note 5.

Product Revenue

The Parent has had no product revenue to date.

Share-Based Compensation

The Parent measures and recognizes share-based compensation expense, for both employee and director option awards, based on the grant date fair value of the awards. The Parent calculates the fair value of restricted share unit awards based on the grant date fair value of the underlying ordinary shares. The Parent recognizes share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period.

The Parent determines the fair value of share-based awards granted tonon-employees as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. All issuances of equity instruments issued tonon-employees as consideration for goods or services received by the Parent are accounted for based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. These awards are recorded in expense and additionalpaid-in capital in shareholders’ equity over the applicable service periods based on the fair value of the options at the end of each period. The Parent accounts for the expense from share-based awards tonon-employees byre-measuring the awards at fair value over the vesting period.

The additionalpaid-in capital presented on the Parent’s supplementary balance sheets presented as the supplementary financial information only reflects share-based compensation expense fornon-employee option awards and share-based compensation expense for option awards granted to outsidenon-employee directors, which are accounted for as employee option awards. The remainder of the consolidated share-based compensation expense was recorded by the Parent’s subsidiaries as the expense relates to option awards and restricted share units granted to employees of the subsidiaries.

After the closing of the Parent’s initial public offering (“IPO”) in November 2015, the fair value of the ordinary shares underlying the Company’s share-based awards is based on the closing price of the Parent’s ordinary shares as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of grant.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

The fair value of each share option grant was determined using the methods and assumptions discussed below. Each of theseThese inputs isare generally subjective and generally requiresrequire significant judgment and estimation by management.

 

  

Fair Value of Ordinary Shares. Following the completion of the Parent’s IPO, the The fair value of the ordinary shares underlying the Company’s share-based awards is based on the closing price of the Parent’s ordinary shares as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of grant.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2017

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

  

Expected Term. The expected term of share options represents the weighted-average period that the share options are expected to remain outstanding. The Company estimated the expected term using the simplified method, which is an average of the contractual term of the option and the vesting period.

 

  

Expected Volatility. Since there is limited historical data for the Parent’s ordinary shares and limited company-specific historical volatility, it has determined the share price volatility for options granted based on an analysis of the volatility used by a peer group of publicly traded companies. In evaluating similarity, the Parent considers factors such as industry, stage of life cycle and size.

 

  

Risk-free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant forzero-coupon U.S. Treasury notes with remaining terms similar to the expected term of the options.

 

  

Dividend Rate. The expected dividend was assumed to be zero as the Parent has never paid dividends and has no current plans to do so.

Income Taxes

The Parent accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements, but have not been reflected in taxable income. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value. Therefore, the Parent provides a valuation allowance to the extent that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future.

The Parent accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements by applying atwo-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination by the taxingtax authorities. If the tax position is deemedmore-likely-than-not to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of any resulting tax reserves, or unrecognized tax benefits, that are considered appropriate as well as the related net interest and penalties.

The Parent recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax provision on the consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss.

The Parent has certain research and management services agreements in place with Wave USA, it’s U.S. subsidiary, which include transfer pricing assumptions. The determination of the appropriate level of transfer pricing requires judgment based on transfer pricing analyses of comparable companies. The Parent monitors the nature of its service agreements for changes in its operations as well as economic conditions. The Parent also periodically reviews the transfer pricing analyses for changes in the composition in the pool of comparable companies as well the related ongoing results of the comparable companies.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Unasserted Claims

In the ordinary course of business, the Parent may be subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation as the Parent operates in an industry susceptible to patent and other legal claims. The Parent accounts for estimated losses with respect to legal proceedings and claims when such losses are probable and estimable. Legal costs associated with these matters are expensed when incurred. The Parent is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2017

3. INTERCOMPANY BALANCES

The intercompany balances presented on the Parent’s balance sheets are the result of intercompany transactions between the Parent and its subsidiaries.

On October 1, 2017, the Company made changes to its corporate entity operating structure, including transferring intellectual property from Wave Japan to the Parent, as well as transferring intellectual property from the Parent to Wave USA and Wave UK, primarily to align the Company’s intellectual property holding and management structure with its business functions. As a result of the changes in the Company’s corporate entity structure that were made in October 2017, the Parent made capital contributions to its subsidiaries, which increased the investment in subsidiaries and all of the outstanding intercompany loans to Wave USA and Wave Japan were repaid in full.

During 2016, the Parent entered into multiple intercompany loan agreements with two of its subsidiaries; Wave USA and Wave Japan. As of December 31, 2016, intercompany loans to subsidiaries amounted to $14.3 million. These intercompany loans entered into in 2016 were unsecured and the interest rate per annum was 0.56%. The $14.3 million of outstanding intercompany loans at December 31, 2016 would have matured on December 31, 2017. Even though these loans would have matured in 2017, they were classified on the Parent’s balance sheet as long term as of December 31, 2016 because the Parent did not believe that it was likely that its subsidiaries would be able to repay the loan amounts in 2017 as the subsidiaries had no commercial revenue or other sources of income. As of December 31, 2016, the Parent determined that if its subsidiaries were unable to repay the intercompany loan when the loans matured that it would enter into new intercompany loan agreements with its subsidiaries for the full amount outstanding at the time of maturity. In 2017 all of the outstanding intercompany loans to subsidiaries were repaid in full prior to the maturity date as a result of the October 2017 changes in the Company’s corporate entity operating structure.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, intercompany accounts receivable were made up of amounts receivable from Wave USAreceivables totaled $1.2 million and related to certain expenses that were paid for on behalf of Wave USA by the Parent as well as other amounts receivabledue from Wave USA related to proceeds from the exercise of share options by Wave USA’s employees. The Parent issues options to purchase its shares to employees of its subsidiaries as a part of the compensation package.

As of December 31, 2016, intercompany interest receivablewell as amounts due from Wave UK related to the intercompany loan agreements amounted to $0.1 million and was included in the intercompany receivables. The remainderreimbursement of the intercompany accounts receivables as of December 31, 2016 were mainly made up of amounts receivable from Wave USA related to certain expenses that were paid for by the Parent on behalf of Wave USA by the Parent as well as otherUK.

As of December 31, 2018, intercompany accounts receivables totaled $0.1 million and related to amounts receivabledue from Wave USA related to proceeds from the exercise of share options by Wave USA’s employees.employees as well as amounts due from Wave UK related to the reimbursement of certain expenses that were paid for by the Parent on behalf of Wave UK.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, the intercompany accounts payable totaled $11.7$5.2 million and related to amounts payable to Wave USA and Wave Japan. The majority of the intercompany accounts payable related to amounts payabledue to Wave USA under the intercompany research and management services agreements. There were also intercompany amounts payable to Wave Japan related to the October 2017 transfer of intellectual property from Wave Japan to the Parent,agreements as well as additional amounts payabledue to Wave USA and Wave Japan related to the reimbursement of certain expenses that were paid for by subsidiariesWave USA and Wave Japan on behalf of the Parent.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, the intercompany accounts payable totaled $12.5$8.5 million and related to amounts payabledue to Wave USA under the intercompany research and management services agreements as well as additional amounts payabledue to Wave USA related to the reimbursement of certain expenses that were paid for by Wave USA on behalf of the Parent.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 20172019

 

4. INCOME TAXES

The components of the Parent’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 are as follows:

 

  December 31,
2017
   December 31,
2016
   December 31,
2019
   December 31,
2018
 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Net operating loss carryforwards

  $25,893   $14,175   $30,408   $27,787 

Intangible assets

   —      265 

Other

   —      743 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   25,893    14,440    30,408    28,530 
  

 

   

 

 

Valuation allowance

   (25,776   (14,336   (30,013   (28,530
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   117    104    395    —   

Deferred tax liability:

        

Interest income

   (117   (104

Other

   (395   —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax liability

   (117   (104   (395   —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

  $—     $—     $—     $—   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Parent has net operating loss carryforwards in Singapore of $149.2$171.6 million, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities and can be carried forward indefinitely provided the Parent satisfies the shareholdings test for carry-forward losses.

The Parent has evaluated the positive and negative evidence bearing upon its ability to realize its deferred tax assets. Management has considered the Parent’s history of cumulative net losses incurred since inception and its lack of commercialization of any products or generation of any revenue from product sales since inception and has concluded that it is more likely than not that the Parent will not realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets in Singapore. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been established against those deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017.2019. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $11.4$1.5 million in 20172019 primarily because of operating losses generated with no corresponding financial statement benefit. The Parent may release this valuation allowance when management determines that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Any release of valuation allowance will be recorded as a tax benefit increasing net income.

The Parent’s policy is to record interest and penalties related to income taxes as part of its income tax provision. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Parent had incurred less than $0.1 million and zero, respectively, of interest or penalties related to income taxes.

The Parent files income tax returns as prescribed by the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. In the normal course of business, the Parent is subject to examination by various taxing authorities in Singapore. There are currently no pending income tax examinations. Tax years from 20132015 to the present are still open to examination in Singapore.

As of December 31, 20172019, and 2016, $48.82018, $17.2 million and $1.7$53.0 million of cash and cash equivalents, respectively, was held by the Parent’s subsidiaries outside of Singapore. Additionally, as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Parent’s subsidiaries held restricted cash of $3.6 million outside of Singapore. The Parent does not provide for Singapore income tax or foreign withholding taxes on foreign unrepatriated earnings, as the Parent intends to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings in its foreign subsidiaries. If the Parent decides to change this

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2017

4. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)

assertion in the future to repatriate any additional foreign earnings, the Parent may be required to accrue and pay taxes. Because of the complexity of Singapore and foreign tax rules applicable to the distribution of earnings from foreign subsidiaries to Singapore, the determination of the unrecognized deferred tax liability on these earnings is not practicable.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

5. PFIZER COLLABORATION AND SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENTAGREEMENTS

OnPfizer Collaboration and Equity Agreements

In May 5, 2016, the Parent entered into a Research, License and Option Agreement (the(as amended in November 2017, the “Pfizer Collaboration Agreement”) with Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”). Pursuant to the terms of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the Parent and Pfizer agreed to collaborate on the discovery, development and commercialization of stereopure oligonucleotide therapeutics for up to five programs (the “Pfizer Programs”), each directed at a genetically-defined hepatic target selected by Pfizer (the “Pfizer Collaboration”). The Parent received $10.0 million as an upfront license fee under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. Subject to option exercises by Pfizer, the Parent may earn potential research, development and commercial milestone payments, plus royalties, tiered up to low double-digits, on sales of any products that may result from the Pfizer Collaboration. None of the payments under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement are refundable.

Simultaneously with the entry into the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the Parent entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Pfizer Equity Agreement,” and together with the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the “Pfizer Agreements”) with C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V., an affiliate of Pfizer (the “Pfizer Affiliate”). Pursuant to the terms of the Pfizer Equity Agreement, the Pfizer Affiliate purchased 1,875,000 of the Parent’s ordinary shares (the “Shares”) at a purchase price of $16.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $30.0 million. The Parent did not incur any material costs in connection with the issuance of the Shares.

Under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement, the parties agreed to collaborate during thea four-year Research Term.research term. During the Research Term,research term, the Parent is responsible to use its commercially reasonable efforts to advance up to five programs through to the selection of clinical candidates. At that stage, Pfizer may elect to license any of these Pfizer Programs exclusively and to haveobtain exclusive rights to undertake the clinical development of the resulting clinical candidates into products and the potential commercialization of any such products thereafter. In addition, the Parent receivesreceived anon-exclusive, royalty-bearing sublicensable license to use Pfizer’s hepatic targeting technology in any of the Company’s own hepatic programs that are outside the scope of the Pfizer Collaboration (the “Wave Programs”). If the Company uses this technology on the Wave Programs, Pfizer is eligible to receive potential development and commercial milestone payments from the Company. Pfizer is also eligible to receive tiered royalties on sales of any products that include Pfizer’s hepatic targeting technology.

Pfizer nominated two The Company is not currently utilizing Pfizer’s hepatic targets upon entry intotargeting technology in any of its own hepatic programs that are outside of the scope of the Pfizer Collaboration in May 2016. In August 2016, Pfizer nominated the third hepatic target under the Pfizer Collaboration for which the Parent received a $2.5 million milestone payment in 2016. On November 5, 2017, the Parent amended its Pfizer Collaboration Agreement to extend the target nomination period from November 5, 2017 to May 5, 2018. This amendment provides Pfizer with an additional six months to nominate the two remaining hepatic targets under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. Pfizer nominated the fourth and fifth hepatic targets in March 2018 and April 2018, respectively.

The Parent has determined that the options held by Pfizer under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement are substantive and priced at a significant incremental discount. Accordingly, $3.0 million of the upfront payment was allocated to the options to nominate the three remaining targets upon inception. The amount allocated to the

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2017

5. PFIZER COLLABORATION AND SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT (CONTINUED)

three options will be recognized as the research and development services are provided commencing from the date that Pfizer exercises each respective option, or immediately as each option expires unexercised. The portion of the upfront payment allocated to the initial two targets was $7.0 million and will be recognized as the research and development services are provided from the inception of the arrangement. Subsequently, in 2016, Pfizer exercised its option to nominate a third program. The Parent will recognize $3.5 million of revenue (which is comprised of $1.0 million allocated to the option at inception of the arrangement and $2.5 million paid by Pfizer at the time of exercising the option) as the research and development services are provided. In November 2017, the Parent achieved a milestone under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement and the revenue related to this milestone was recognized in full during the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Pfizer Collaboration is managed by a joint steering committee in which both parties are represented equally, which will oversee the scientific progression of each Pfizer Program up to the clinical candidate stage. During the four-year Research Term and for a period of two years thereafter, the Parent has agreed to work exclusively with Pfizer with respect to using any of the Company’s stereopure oligonucleotide technology that is specific for the applicable hepatic target which is the basis of any Pfizer Program.

The stated term of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement commenced on May 5, 2016 and terminates on the date of the last to expire payment obligation with respect to each Pfizer Program and, with respect to each Wave Program, expires on aprogram-by-program basis accordingly. Pfizer may terminate its rights related to a Pfizer Program under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement at its own convenience upon 90 days’ notice to the Parent. The Parent may also terminate its rights related to a Wave Program at its own convenience upon 90 days’ notice to Pfizer. The Pfizer Collaboration Agreement may also be terminated by either party in the event of an uncured material breach of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement by the other party.

Pfizer nominated two hepatic targets upon entry into the Pfizer Collaboration in May 2016. The Pfizer Collaboration Agreement provides Pfizer with options to nominate up to three additional programs by making nomination milestone payments. Pfizer nominated the third, fourth and fifth hepatic targets in August 2016, March 2018 and April 2018, respectively.

The Pfizer Collaboration is managed by a joint steering committee in which both parties are represented equally, which will oversee the scientific progression of each Pfizer Program up to the clinical candidate stage. During the

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

5. COLLABORATION AGREEMENTS (CONTINUED)

four-year research term and for a period of two years thereafter, the Parent has agreed to work exclusively with Pfizer with respect to using any of the Company’s stereopure oligonucleotide technology that is specific for the applicable hepatic target which is the basis of any Pfizer Program. Within a specified period after receiving a data package for a candidate under each nominated program, Pfizer may exercise an option to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize the program candidate by paying an exercise price per program.

The Parent assessed this arrangement in accordance with ASC 606 and concluded that the contract counterparty, Pfizer, is a customer. The Parent identified the following promises under the arrangement: (1) thenon-exclusive, royalty-free research and development license; (2) the research and development services for Programs 1 and 2; (3) the program nomination options for Programs 3, 4 and 5; (4) the research and development services associated with Programs 3, 4 and 5; (5) the options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 1 and 2; and (6) the options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 3, 4 and 5. The research and development services for each of Programs 1 and 2 were determined to not be distinct from the research and development license and should be combined into a single performance obligation for each program. The promises under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement relate primarily to the research and development required by the Parent for each of the programs nominated by Pfizer.

Additionally, the Parent determined that the program nomination options for Programs 3, 4 and 5 were priced at a discount and, as such, provide material rights to Pfizer, representing three separate performance obligations. The research and development services associated with Programs 3, 4 and 5 and the options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 3, 4 and 5 are subject to Pfizer’s exercise of the program nomination options for such programs and therefore do not represent performance obligations at the outset of the arrangement. The options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 1 and 2 do not represent material rights; as such, they are not representative of performance obligations at the outset of the arrangement. Based on these assessments, the Parent identified five performance obligations in the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement: (1) research and development services and license for Program 1; (2) research and development services and license for Program 2; (3) material right provided for the option to nominate Program 3; (4) material right provided for the option to nominate Program 4; and (5) material right provided for the option to nominate Program 5.

At the outset of the arrangement, the transaction price included only the $10.0 millionup-front consideration received. The Parent determined that the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement did not contain a significant financing component. The program nomination option exercise fees for research and development services associated with Programs 3, 4 and 5 that may be received are excluded from the transaction price until each customer option is exercised. The potential milestone payments were excluded from the transaction price, as all milestone amounts were fully constrained at the inception of the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. The exercise fees for the options to obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Programs 3, 4 and 5 that may be received are excluded from the transaction price until each customer option is exercised. The Parent will reevaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur, and, if necessary, will adjust its estimate of the transaction price.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, it became probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue would not occur for a developmental milestone under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. At such time, the associated consideration was added to the estimated transaction price and allocated to the existing performance obligations, and the Parent recognized a cumulativecatch-up to revenue for this developmental milestone, representing the amount that would have been recognized had the milestone payment been included in the

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

5. COLLABORATION AGREEMENTS (CONTINUED)

transaction price from the outset of the arrangement. The remainder will be recognized in the same manner as the remaining, unrecognized transaction price over the remaining period until each performance obligation is satisfied.

Revenue associated with the performance obligations relating to Programs 1 and 2 is being recognized as revenue as the research and development services are provided using an input method, according to the full-time employee (“FTE”) hours incurred on each program and the FTE hours expected to be incurred in the future to satisfy the performance obligation. The transfer of control occurs over time and, in management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation. The amount allocated to the three material rights will be recognized as the underlying research and development services are provided commencing from the date that Pfizer exercises each respective option, or immediately as each option expires unexercised. The amounts received that have not yet been recognized as revenue are recorded in deferred revenue on the Parent’s supplementary balance sheets.

Pfizer nominated the third, fourth and fifth hepatic targets in August 2016, March 2018 and April 2018, respectively. Upon each exercise, the Parent allocated the transaction price amount allocated to the material right at inception of the arrangement plus the program nomination option exercise fee paid by Pfizer at the time of exercising the option to a new performance obligation, which will be recognized as revenue as the research and development services are provided using the same method as the performance obligations relating to Programs 1 and 2.

Through December 31, 2019, the Parent had recognized revenue of $17.0 million as collaboration revenue in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Parent recognized revenue of $3.7$7.1 million, $4.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively, under the Pfizer Collaboration Agreement. DeferredThe aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Parent’s partially unsatisfied performance obligations and recorded in deferred revenue amountedat December 31, 2019 is $1.5 million, all of which is included in current liabilities. The Parent expects to $8.3 millionrecognize the remaining deferred revenue according to FTE hours incurred, over the remaining research term, which is four months as of December 31, 2017,2019.

Takeda Collaboration and Equity Agreements

In February 2018, Wave USA and Wave UK entered into a global strategic collaboration (the “Takeda Collaboration”) with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (“Takeda”), pursuant to which Wave USA, Wave UK and Takeda agreed to collaborate on the research, development and commercialization of oligonucleotide therapeutics for disorders of the Central Nervous System (“CNS”).

Simultaneously with Wave USA and Wave UK’s entry into the collaboration and license agreement with Takeda (the “Takeda Collaboration Agreement”), the Parent entered into a share purchase agreement with Takeda (the “Takeda Equity Agreement,” and together with the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, the “Takeda Agreements”) pursuant to which $2.7 million is includedthe Parent agreed to sell to Takeda 1,096,892 of its ordinary shares at a purchase price of $54.70 per share. In April 2018, the Parent closed the Takeda Equity Agreement and received aggregate cash proceeds of $60.0 million. The Parent did not incur any material costs in current liabilities.connection with the issuance of shares.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

6. SHARE CAPITAL

Ordinary Shares

The following represents the historical ordinary share transactions of the Parent from January 1,December 31, 2016 through December 31, 2017:2019:

 

In May 2016, the Parent granted 1,875,000 ordinary shares to Pfizer under the Pfizer Agreements at a purchase price of $16.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $30.0 million.

In April 2017, the Parent closed afollow-on underwritten public offering of 4,166,667 ordinary shares at a purchase price of $24.00 per share for gross proceeds of $100.0 million. The net proceeds from this issuance were $93.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

NotesIn April 2018, the Parent issued 1,096,892 ordinary shares to Supplementary Financial InformationTakeda under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement at a purchase price of $54.70 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $60.0 million.

Year ended December 31, 2017

6. SHARE CAPITAL (CONTINUED)

 

In January 2019, the Parent closed afollow-on underwritten public offering of 3,950,000 ordinary shares at a purchase price of $38.00 per share for gross proceeds of $150.1 million, and in February 2019 the Parent closed on the sale of an additional 592,500 ordinary shares (collectively, the “January 2019 Offering”) for gross proceeds of an additional $22.5 million. The net proceeds to the Parent from the January 2019 Offering were $161.8 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

Features of the Series A Preferred Shares and Ordinary Shares

The Series A preferred shares and ordinary shares have no par value and there is no concept of authorized share capital under Singapore law. The rights, preferences, and privileges of ordinary shares are as follows:

New Share Offering

Prior to the closing of the Parent’s initial public offering, any new ordinary shares or securities convertible into ordinary shares were required to be offered in the first instance to all the then holders of any class of shares, other than the Series A preferred shares prior to issuance and each shareholder had the right ofpre-emption with respect to any issuance of new ordinary shares or securities convertible into ordinary shares. This right ofpre-emption didare not apply to shares sold in the Parent’s initial public offering and terminated immediately prior to the closing of the Parent’s initial public offering.redeemable.

Voting

The holders of Series A preferred shares are not entitled to vote on any of the matters proposed to shareholders, other than as specified in the Parent’s Constitution. The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to one vote for each ordinary share held at all meetings of shareholders and written actions in lieu of meetings.

Dividends

All dividends, if any, shall be declared and paid pro rata according to the number of shares held by each member entitled to receive dividends. The Parent’s board of directors may deduct from any dividend all sums of money presently payable by the member to the Parent on account of calls.

Liquidation

In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of, or a return of capital by the Parent, the ordinary shares will rank equally with the Series A preferred shares after the payment of the liquidation preference of $10.00an aggregate of approximately $10 thousand for Series A preferred shares.

Series A Preferred Shares

The Series A preferred shares are classified as temporary shareholders’ equity since the holders of the Series A preferred shares are entitled to a liquidation preference upon a deemed liquidation event, which is outside the control of the Parent. In the event a deemed liquidation event were to occur, the Parent would adjust the carrying value of the Series A preferred shares to their liquidation value, which amounts to $10.00 in the aggregate.

The Series A preferred shares have no par value and there is no authorized share capital under Singapore law. The Series A preferred shares are not redeemable.

7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

In December 2014, the Parent’s board of directors adopted the Wave Life Sciences Ltd. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), and reserved 1,763,714 ordinary shares for issuance under this plan, which was increased to 5,064,544 in 2015, and to 6,064,544 in 2017.2017, to 6,943,344 in 2018, and to 7,971,331 in 2019. The 2014 Plan authorizes the board of directors or a committee of the board to grant incentive share options,non-qualified share options, share appreciation rights, restricted awards, which includesinclude restricted shares and restricted share units (“RSUs”), and performance awards to eligible employees,non-employees and directors of the Company.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 20172019

7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

 

(“RSUs”), and performance awards to eligible employees, consultants and directors of the Company. The Company accounts for grants to its board of directors as grants to employees.

As of December 31, 2017, 1,716,1102019, 1,081,856 ordinary shares remained available for future grant under the 2014 Plan.

Share option activity forunder the year ended December 31, 20172014 Plan is summarized as follows:

 

   Number of
Shares
   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted-
Average

Remaining
Contractual

Term
(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)(1)
 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2017

   3,577,766   $10.58     

Granted(2)

   522,750    26.33     

Exercised

   (137,493   6.74     

Forfeited or cancelled

   (195,893   14.71     
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Outstanding as of December 31, 2017

   3,767,130   $12.69    7.81   $84,675 
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2017

   2,257,455   $7.64    7.43   $62,060 

Options unvested as of December 31, 2017

   1,509,675   $20.23    8.37   $22,614 
   Number of
Shares
   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)(1)
 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2019

   4,016,590   $19.47     

Granted(2)

   163,200    21.89     

Exercised

   (213,556   12.20     

Forfeited or cancelled

   (127,685   32.47     
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Outstanding as of December 31, 2019

   3,838,549   $19.54    6.13   $7,530 
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2019

   2,972,764   $15.17    5.75   $7,530 

 

(1) 

The aggregate intrinsic value of options is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the share options and the fair value of the Parent’s ordinary shares for those share options that had exercise prices lower than the fair value of the ordinary shares as of the end of the period.

(2) 

Includes 72,000126,000 options granted by the Parent to outsidenon-employee directors during 2017;2019; these options are treated as options granted to employees.

Options granted to employees of the Parent’s subsidiaries generally vest over a period of three or four years, and options that are forfeited or cancelled are available to be granted again. The options granted by the Parent to outside directors andnon-employees generally vest over periods of one to four years, and options that are forfeited or cancelled are available to be granted again. The contractual life of options granted to employees of the Parent’s subsidiaries is generally ten years from the grant date. The contractual life of options granted by the Parent to outside directors andnon-employeesis generally five andor ten years respectively, from the grant date.

The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of share options granted to employees during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016period were as follows:

 

  For the Year Ended December 31,   For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016   2019   2018   2017 

Risk-free interest rate

   1.49% - 2.23%    1.15% - 2.18%    1.34% - 2.62%    2.49% - 3.01%    1.49% - 2.23% 

Expected term (in years)

   3.00 - 6.25    3.00 - 6.25    3.00 - 6.11    3.00 - 6.25    3.00 - 6.25 

Expected volatility

   68.95% - 72.24%    60.89% - 68.76%    68% - 74%    64% - 71%    69% - 72% 

Expected dividend yield

   0%    0%    0%    0%    0% 

The options that were granted tonon-employees in 2015 were fully vested as of December 31, 2018. There werehave been no additional options granted tonon-employees in 2017 or 2016.since 2015.

As of December 31, 2017, the unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options was $16.9 million for employees and $1.0 million fornon-employees. Of the total unrecognized compensation cost of $17.9 million, $1.8 million related to the Parent, which included $0.8 million of the unrecognized compensation

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 20172019

7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

 

cost for employees and the $1.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost fornon-employees. The unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options for employees andnon-employees is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.6 years. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the weighted-average grant date fair value per granted option was $16.58 and $30.23, respectively. The aggregate fair value of options that vested during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $11.5 million.

RSU activity for the year ended December 31, 20172019 is summarized as follows:

 

  RSUs   Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
(in dollars
per share)
   RSUs   Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
(in dollars
per share)
 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2017

   22,750    21.69 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2019

   408,521   $37.16 

Granted

   170,859    29.05    1,566,855    42.71 

Vested

   (22,750   21.69    (112,437   36.61 

Forfeited

   (16,400   29.05    (111,077   42.69 
  

 

     

 

   

RSUs Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   154,459   $29.05 

RSUs Outstanding at December 31, 2019

   1,751,862   $41.81 
  

 

     

 

   

RSUs were first granted in 2016 and, to date, RSUs have only been granted to employees of the Parent’s subsidiaries. The RSUs granted in 2016 fully vested upon the first anniversary of the grant date andOf the RSUs granted, in 2017567,915 were time-based RSUs and 998,940 were performance-based RSUs. Vesting of these performance-based RSUs is contingent on the occurrence of certain regulatory and commercial milestones. Time-based RSUs generally vest annually over a periodperiods of one to four years. RSUs that are forfeited are available to be granted again. Share-based compensationThe Company did not recognize an expense in 2019 related to the performance-based RSUs as the related milestones were not considered probable of achievement.

As of December 31, 2019, the unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options was $17.1 million for employees. Of the total unrecognized compensation cost, $1.2 million related to the Parent’s options grantedto non-employee directors and the remaining $15.9 million related to the options granted to employees of the Parent’s subsidiaries. The unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options for employees is included in researchexpected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.94 years. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and development expenses or general2017, the weighted-average grant date fair value per granted option was $11.95, $27.90 and administrative expenses on$16.58, respectively. The aggregate fair value of options that vested during the consolidated statements of operations.years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, was $15.2 million, $9.3 million and $11.5 million, respectively. The unrecognized compensation costs related to outstanding time-based RSUs was $3.5$23.7 million as of December 31, 2017,2019 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.112.76 years. The total fair value of RSUs vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $4.2 million, $1.8 million, and $0.4 million, respectively.

The Company recorded share-basedShare-based compensation expense of $12.1 million and $6.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is classified as operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and 2016, respectively, of which $2.9 million and $2.7 millioncomprehensive loss as follows:

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in thousands) 

Research and development expenses

  $9,479   $9,172   $7,670 

General and administrative expenses

   10,030    6,424    4,473 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total share-based compensation expense

  $19,509   $15,596   $12,143 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

There was no share-based compensation expense recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019 related to options granted tonon-employees. Of the total share-based compensation expense recorded for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, $1.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively, related to options granted tonon-employees, all of which is included in research and development expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Of the total share-based compensation expense recorded, the Parent recorded

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year ended December 31, 2019

7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

share-based compensation expense of $4.0$1.2 million, $2.3 million and $2.8$4.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20172019, 2018 and 2016,2017, respectively. The Parent records the share-based compensation expense related to options granted tonon-employees and outsidenon-employee directors. The options granted to outsidenon-employee directors are treated as options granted to employees. The Parent’s subsidiaries record share-based compensation expense related to options and RSUs granted to employees of the subsidiaries, as well as shares issued to employees of the subsidiaries.

8. RELATED PARTIESPARTY

The Parent had the following related party transactionstransaction for the periods presented in the accompanying supplementary financial information, which havehas not otherwise been discussed in these notes to the supplementary financial information:

 

The Parent held cash of $0.1 million in depository accounts with Kagoshima Bank, Ltd., an affiliate of one of the Company’sParent’s shareholders, Kagoshima Shinsangyo Sousei Investment Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Notes to Supplementary Financial Information

Year2017. These depository accounts were closed during the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172018.

9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Takeda CollaborationWorkforce Reduction

On February 6, 2020, the Company implemented a plan to reduce operating costs and Equity Investment

In February 2018, Wave USAbetter align its workforce with the needs of its business following the Company’s December 16, 2019 announcement of its decision to discontinue the suvodirsen program for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (“DMD”) and Wave UK entered into a global strategic collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (“Takeda”) (the “Takeda Collaboration”), pursuant to which Wave USA, Wave UK and Takeda agreed to collaborate on the research,cease development and commercialization of oligonucleotide therapeutics for disorders of the central nervous system (“CNS”)Company’s other DMD programs. Under this cost reduction plan, the Company reduced its workforce by approximately 22%. The Takeda Collaboration providesCompany estimates that it willincur one-time restructuring charges of approximately $3.5 million, including employee severance, benefits and related termination costs, the Company with at least $230.0 million in committed cash and Takeda with the option toco-develop andco-commercialize Wave’s CNS development programs in HD, ALS and FTD, as well as Wave’s discovery-stage program targeting ATXN3 for the treatmentmajority of spinocerebellar ataxia 3. In addition, Takeda will have the right to exclusively license multiple preclinical programs for CNS disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. In April 2018, the Takeda Collaboration became effective and Takedawhich was paid the Company $110.0 million as an upfront payment. Takeda also agreed to fund the Company’s research and preclinical activities in the amountfirst quarter of $60.0 million during2020.

Coronavirus Outbreak

On March 11, 2020, the four-year research termWorld Health Organization declared the Coronavirus(“COVID-19”) outbreak to be a pandemic in recognition of its rapid spread across the globe. Many governments are taking increasingly stringent steps to help contain or delay the spread of the virus.

For the December 31, 2019 financial statements, theCOVID-19 outbreak and to reimburse the Company for any collaboration-budgeted research and preclinical expenses incurred by us that exceed that amount.

Simultaneously with Wave USA and Wave UK’s entry into the collaboration and license agreement with Takeda (the “Takeda Collaboration Agreement”), the Parent entered into a share purchase agreement with Takeda pursuantrelated impacts are considerednon-adjusting events. The extent to which the Parent agreedglobal pandemic may impact the Company’s supply chain, patients in its clinical trials, and its employees, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. Many of the Company’s employees and vendors are working remotely, however given the nature of research and development, manufacturing, and clinical trials, there are many activities that cannot be conducted remotely. As a result, there could be delays in research and development, manufacturing and preclinical and clinical activities due to selltheCOVID-19 pandemic. The Company continues to Takeda 1,096,892evaluateCOVID-19’s effect on its liquidity, capital resources, operations and business, and those of its ordinary shares at a purchase price of $54.70 per share (the “Takeda Equity Investment”). In April 2018, the Parent closed the Takeda Equity Investment and received aggregate cash proceeds of $60.0 million.third parties on which it relies.

LOGO

VOTE PROCESSING

C/O BROADRIDGE

51 MERCEDES WAY

EDGEWOOD, NY 11717

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

LOGO

VOTE PROCESSING C/O BROADRIDGE 51 MERCEDES WAY EDGEWOOD, NY 11717 VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E49628-Z72944 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

D15752-Z77822        KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

    WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the director nominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2, 3, and 4. 1. The Election of the Nominees for Director Nominees: For Against Abstain 1a. Paul B. Bolno, M.D. 1b. Christian Henry 1c. Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D. 1d. Koji Miura 1e. Adrian Rawcliffe 1f. Ken Takanashi 1g. Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D. For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated. Please indicate if you plan to attend the 2018 Annual General Meeting. Yes No

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all of the director
nominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2, 3, 4, and 5.

1.  The Election of the Nominees for Director:

ForAgainstAbstain
        1a.Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBALOGOLOGOLOGO
        1b.Mark H. N. Corrigan, M.D.LOGOLOGOLOGO
        1c.Christian Henry

LOGO

LOGOLOGO
        1d.Peter Kolchinsky, Ph.D.LOGOLOGOLOGO
        1e.Amy PottLOGOLOGOLOGO
        1f.Adrian RawcliffeLOGOLOGOLOGO
        1g.Ken TakanashiLOGOLOGOLOGO
        1h.Aik Na TanLOGOLOGOLOGO
        1i.Gregory L. Verdine, Ph.D.LOGOLOGOLOGO
        1j.Heidi L. Wagner, J.D.LOGOLOGOLOGO
ForAgainstAbstain
2.

To approve the re-appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor for the year ending December 31, 2020, and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to fix KPMG LLP’s remuneration for services provided through the date of our 2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

LOGOLOGOLOGO
3.

To approve the Company’s payment of cash and equity-based compensation to non-employee directors for service on the Board of Directors and its committees, in the manner and on the basis set forth under “Proposal 3: Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation” in the proxy statement

LOGOLOGOLOGO
4.

To authorize the Board of Directors to allot and issue Ordinary Shares of Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

LOGOLOGOLOGO
5.

To approve by a non-binding advisory vote the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement

LOGOLOGOLOGO
6.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and all adjournments or postponements thereof

Please indicate if you plan to attend the 2020 Annual General Meeting.

LOGOLOGO
YesNo

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. 2. To approve the re-appointment of KPMG LLP to serve For Against Abstain as our independent registered public accounting firm and independent Singapore auditor for the year ending December 31, 2018, and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to fix KPMG LLP’s remuneration for services provided through the date of our 2019

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date


Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders 3. To approve the compensation to be paid to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors for service on the Board and its committees, as described under “Proposal 3: Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation” 4. To authorize the Board of Directors to allot and issue Ordinary Shares of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. 5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the 2018 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and all adjournments or postponements thereof Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. 2018 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders Tuesday,Wednesday, August 7, 2018,12, 2020, 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time

Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

733 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138

Upon arrival, please present this admission ticket

and photo identification at the registration desk. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS: The notice, proxy statement and our 2017 annual report to shareholders are available for viewing, printing and downloading at https://materials.proxyvote.com/.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE 2020 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS:The notice,

proxy statement and our 2019 annual report to shareholders are available for viewing,

printing and downloading at https://materials.proxyvote.com/.

Vote by Mail

Whether or not you expect to attend the 20182020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, please mark,

sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to

Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

YOUR PROXY CARD MUST BE RECEIVED AT THE ADDRESS ABOVE NOT LESS THAN 48 HOURS BEFORE THE TIME

APPOINTED FOR HOLDING THE 20182020 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (OR WITHIN SUCH OTHER TIME

AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE SINGAPORE COMPANIES ACT). E49629-Z72944

D15753-Z77822        

Proxy - WAVE LIFE SCIENCES LTD. (Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore;

Company Registration Number 201218209G) 2018

2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

August 7, 2018 12, 2020

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

Paul B. Bolno, M.D., MBA, and in his absence, Linda Rockett, Esq., each with the power of substitution and each with the full power to act alone, are hereby authorized as Proxies to represent and vote the ordinary shares of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. owned by the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the 20182020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Wave Life Sciences Ltd. to be held on August 7, 201812, 2020 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the Proxies as directed herein by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR the director nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2, FOR Proposal 3, FOR Proposal 4, and FOR Proposal 4. 5.

In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before 20182020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Address Changes/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side